said_aouita;1422144 wrote:She somewhat looks like a hotter Alexi Pappas.

I see the similarity. One looks like a duck. The other is a Duck.

I'm going to nominate the DirecTV genie:

gut;1422257 wrote:I'm going to nominate the DirecTV genie:

Is she wearing colored contacts?

said_aouita;1422343 wrote:Is she wearing colored contacts?

:rolleyes:

gut;1422257 wrote:I'm going to nominate the DirecTV genie:

...and Derek Jeter will second that nomination

vball10set;1422379 wrote::rolleyes:

She looks too ridiculously perfect for that pic not to be heavily airbrushed and shopped

/gut'd

gut;1422469 wrote:She looks too chunky for that pic not to be heavily airbrushed for the love handles.

/gut'd

/gut'd

gut;1422062 wrote:Not a bad choice...to be fair, I saw her on "Punked" without the 3-hrs of makeup and perfect lighting and you probably would not have recognized her. Still naturally beautiful and gorgeous, but it's been said before these girls in magazines and tv don't really look like that in real life.

On here without makeup, she still looks pretty good: http://funventure.blogspot.com/2011/01/celebs-without-makeup.html

In fact, doing a Google image search of "olivia wilde without makeup," she still looks pretty in all the photos I looked at.

I can vouch for Olivia Wilde looking good without make-up. We bang on the reg.

dlazz;1422493 wrote:I can vouch for Olivia Wilde looking good without make-up. We bang on the reg.

Jason Sudeikis gonna be at your place shortly.

dlazz;1422493 wrote:I can vouch for Olivia Wilde looking good without make-up. We bang on the reg.

you banging a blow-up doll with a picture of her face taped to it doesnt quite count.

O-Trap;1422485 wrote:On here without makeup, she still looks pretty good: http://funventure.blogspot.com/2011/01/celebs-without-makeup.html

In fact, doing a Google image search of "olivia wilde without makeup," she still looks pretty in all the photos I looked at.

Didn't say she didn't look good, I said I barely recognized her. But it's not like Punk'd has the best production set-up

gut;1422501 wrote:Didn't say she didn't look good, I said I barely recognized her. But it's not like Punk'd has the best production set-up

I think the "three hours" part of your statement threw me off. I took that to imply that it took a long time to get her to look so good.

O-Trap;1422511 wrote:I think the "three hours" part of your statement threw me off. I took that to imply that it took a long time to get her to look so good.

I also said she's naturally beautiful, but relatively speaking, yes, she doesn't look close to what she does on the big screen without the 3-hrs of make-up and perfect lighting. When I saw her on Punk'd, her air was a bit frazzled to and the lighting and camera angles probably weren't the best. She doesn't have make-up in your photo, but it's still a professional shot from someone presumably trying to get a good photo. And the other photos in that line-up were striking in how bad the people looked, but Olivia Wilde DOES happen to be a great natural beauty.

Here's a few more less flattering shots where I'd say she's almost unrecognizeable (still obviously beautiful, but not someone you'd quickly recognize as Olivia Wilde). Incidentally, she was blonde on Punk'd, and the photo below is more what she looked like on that show. Being a sort of impromptu recording with her out shopping with a friend I think is more reflective of what you'd actually see if you ran into er on the street.

Who cares? Next year it will be the same shit. 4-12 after three years chud will be fired along with banner and Lombardi then we will switch back to the 4-3.

Commander of Awesome;1422653 wrote:Who cares? Next year it will be the same ****. 4-12 after three years chud will be fired along with banner and Lombardi then we will switch back to the 4-3.

Damn you! Reps

gut;1422651 wrote:I also said she's naturally beautiful, but relatively speaking, yes, she doesn't look close to what she does on the big screen without the 3-hrs of make-up and perfect lighting. When I saw her on Punk'd, her air was a bit frazzled to and the lighting and camera angles probably weren't the best. She doesn't have make-up in your photo, but it's still a professional shot from someone presumably trying to get a good photo. And the other photos in that line-up were striking in how bad the people looked, but Olivia Wilde DOES happen to be a great natural beauty.

Here's a few more less flattering shots where I'd say she's almost unrecognizeable (still obviously beautiful, but not someone you'd quickly recognize as Olivia Wilde). Incidentally, she was blonde on Punk'd, and the photo below is more what she looked like on that show. Being a sort of impromptu recording with her out shopping with a friend I think is more reflective of what you'd actually see if you ran into er on the street.

THANKS FOR THE THOROUGH EXPLANATION!

Automatik;1422675 wrote:THANKS FOR THE THOROUGH EXPLANATION!

Seriously, who takes the time to explain that?

"oh guys, just a heads up that is NOT what Olivia Wilde looks like without makeup...I was watching Punk'd and she looked more natural. Come on guys"

Sheesh

So basically what gut is saying is women look different without makeup. Thanks for that revelation.

pmoney25;1422698 wrote:So basically what gut is saying is women look different without makeup. Thanks for that revelation.

And that only on 5th Ave in NYC are there women that are attractive both with and without makeup.

And some places in LA, too.

said_aouita;1422144 wrote:She somewhat looks like a hotter Alexi Pappas.

That is one of the ugliest things I've ever seen

pmoney25;1422698 wrote:So basically what gut is saying is women look different without makeup. Thanks for that revelation.

No, and this is why the long explanation, which you've proven was necessary (and, yet, apparently insufficient).

The women you guys drool over in the magazines and tv/movies don't really look like that, either. And, yes, plenty of women off the street could give them a run for their money given the same "attention" for the most flattering appearance and shots. Or, alternatively, when you see these women on the street they don't stand out and above every "commoner".

vball10set;1422381 wrote:...and Derek Jeter will second that nomination

She will have herpes soon, if she already doesnt.

SportsAndLady;1422701 wrote:And that only on 5th Ave in NYC are there women that are attractive both with and without makeup.

And some places in LA, too.

And clearly not anywhere you live or have been. You still don't get it - I guess suspension of disbelief extends to your bathroom.