Haslam on No. 7

Home ▸ Archive ▸ Thread Bomber's Basement ▸ Haslam on No. 7
T

Tiernan

Senior Member

13,021 posts
Jan 10, 2013 10:51 AM
Jimmy Boy is finding out just being a big-shot billionaire doesn't cut alot of cheese getting some schlump to take over coaching the most inept franchise in the league. Allow me to recap for you...

Kelly...uh definitely a No

Marrone...got a better offer so its a No

Trestman...how do you say No in Canadian?

Wizenhut...After touring this excuse of a city I've gotta say No

Chudzinski...Leave sunny Carolina for that armpit of America? No Way!

Zimmer...Nobody has ever heard of me outside of the Cincy 275 outerbelt so I might consider this dog of a job.
Jan 10, 2013 10:51am
W

WebFire

Go Bucks!

14,779 posts
Jan 10, 2013 11:24 AM
And they thought things would be different. But I'm just a troll.
Jan 10, 2013 11:24am
T

Tiernan

Senior Member

13,021 posts
Jan 10, 2013 11:31 AM
Yeah I saw that Webbie where you lit up COA and the rest of the Browns Mafia. But you gotta rememner you were using a thing called "logic" which is unheard of in the blighted area known as NE Ohio.
Jan 10, 2013 11:31am
Commander of Awesome's avatar

Commander of Awesome

Senior Pwner

23,151 posts
Jan 10, 2013 11:36 AM
Tiernan's panties in a bunch I see.
Jan 10, 2013 11:36am
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Jan 10, 2013 11:39 AM
Explains why the Eagles & Bears are interviewing a shit ton of candidates too, dumbfuck. :rolleyes:
Jan 10, 2013 11:39am
T

Tiernan

Senior Member

13,021 posts
Jan 10, 2013 11:43 AM
BR1986FB;1362812 wrote:Explains why the Eagles & Bears are interviewing a shit ton of candidates too, dumbfuck. :rolleyes:
Eagles & Bears? You're not exactly helping your argument there Sparky.

and JFTR COA...Tiernan's panties are smooth as a baby's ass...its the Browns Org who is starting to look like complete hyenas.
Jan 10, 2013 11:43am
like_that's avatar

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

26,625 posts
Jan 10, 2013 11:44 AM
WebFire;1362775 wrote:And they thought things would be different. But I'm just a troll.

The browns didnt interview that many people the last two hires. Not surprised you don't know that tho.

Nice fail.
Jan 10, 2013 11:44am
Raw Dawgin' it's avatar

Raw Dawgin' it

Just Ain't Care

11,466 posts
Jan 10, 2013 11:45 AM
wait, Tiernan admitted to wearing panties?
Jan 10, 2013 11:45am
T

Tiernan

Senior Member

13,021 posts
Jan 10, 2013 11:52 AM
leopard thongs everyday dickless...and quit stalking me, you're embarrassing yourself if that is even possible anymore.
Jan 10, 2013 11:52am
W

WebFire

Go Bucks!

14,779 posts
Jan 10, 2013 12:02 PM
like_that;1362827 wrote:The browns didnt interview that many people the last two hires. Not surprised you don't know that tho.

Nice fail.
This mean nothing. I asked if Browns fans really thought ownership change would really make a difference for the Browns. They all seemed to think so. Yet they can't even hire a decent coach.

Number of interviews between owners is totally irrelevant to the conversation.

And now I am trolling since it's in the basement. :)
Jan 10, 2013 12:02pm
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Jan 10, 2013 12:12 PM
Tiernan;1362822 wrote:Eagles & Bears? You're not exactly helping your argument there Sparky.
Well, with the firing of Mularkey today, 25% of the NFL was/is looking for a new head coach (two have been filled), so the fact that Cleveland is one of six teams still interviewing, no big deal. Besides, I think their next head coach can't be interviewed right now because he's coaching on a playoff team.

And why in the Hell WOULDN'T you want to do your due diligence and interview as MANY candidates as possible? It's like a free 3-7 hour consulting gig. You pick the candidate's brain for ideas, get a feel for thoughts (league-wide) on your current roster, etc.

You're making a MUCH bigger deal out of it than you really have to with your weaker than Capone-like effort.
Jan 10, 2013 12:12pm
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Jan 10, 2013 12:16 PM
like_that;1362827 wrote:The browns didnt interview that many people the last two hires. Not surprised you don't know that tho.

Nice fail.
Exactly. I'd much rather see these guys interview 10-15 guys than pull the Rander Lerner "oh...Eric Mangini just became available? I think I just pissed down my leg. Where's my phone? He's HIRED!" or the Mike Holmgren "Got the Rooney Rule candidate out of the way, now I'll hire Fritz's nephew" type of kneejerk shit.
Jan 10, 2013 12:16pm
Commander of Awesome's avatar

Commander of Awesome

Senior Pwner

23,151 posts
Jan 10, 2013 12:22 PM
BR1986FB;1362883 wrote:Well, with the firing of Mularkey today, 25% of the NFL was/is looking for a new head coach (two have been filled), so the fact that Cleveland is one of six teams still interviewing, no big deal. Besides, I think their next head coach can't be interviewed right now because he's coaching on a playoff team.

And why in the Hell WOULDN'T you want to do your due diligence and interview as MANY candidates as possible? It's like a free 3-7 hour consulting gig. You pick the candidate's brain for ideas, get a feel for thoughts (league-wide) on your current roster, etc.

You're making a MUCH bigger deal out of it than you really have to with your weaker than Capone-like effort.
BINGO. RAC wasn't hired until mid Feb.
Jan 10, 2013 12:22pm
like_that's avatar

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

26,625 posts
Jan 10, 2013 12:24 PM
WebFire;1362863 wrote:This mean nothing. I asked if Browns fans really thought ownership change would really make a difference for the Browns. They all seemed to think so. Yet they can't even hire a decent coach.

Number of interviews between owners is totally irrelevant to the conversation.

And now I am trolling since it's in the basement. :)
Apparently this is all going over your head. You said nothing has changed. Well the old way for the Browns last ownership was to hire a guy immediately... This time around the Browns are interviewing numerous candidates to get the right choice. They haven't lost out on anyone. They didn't want Kelly after his interview. If they lost out on Kelly, he would have been coaching for another NFL team, not back at Oregon. And once again, as this went over your head the last time, the Browns have no had much change in ownership in their history. You are trying too hard.
Jan 10, 2013 12:24pm
T

Tiernan

Senior Member

13,021 posts
Jan 10, 2013 12:35 PM
You all are some rationalizing mofos aint ya?
Jan 10, 2013 12:35pm
like_that's avatar

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

26,625 posts
Jan 10, 2013 12:38 PM
Tiernan;1362907 wrote:You all are some rationalizing mofos aint ya?
Who is your team anyway?
Jan 10, 2013 12:38pm
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Jan 10, 2013 12:40 PM
Tiernan;1362907 wrote:You all are some rationalizing mofos aint ya?
Don't need to "rationalize" it. If someone like Kelly, Cowher, Gruden, Saban, etc said "no" to Cleveland and then "yes" to another team there might be something to your "nobody wants to coach here" theory.

Truth be told, Cleveland is a cherry job for any one of these coaches. Young, up & coming roster (Steelers & Ravens going to decline/OLD, too bad, so sad) along with $48.9 million in cap space ($35.5 million HAS to be used this year) and an owner who cares & is hungry. Not a bad place to be.
Jan 10, 2013 12:40pm
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Jan 10, 2013 12:41 PM
like_that;1362910 wrote:Who is your team anyway?
Pretty sure he's a fan of the sister pumpin', floss with a ropin', banjo playin' on the stoop of the doublewide, Yinzer fan.
Jan 10, 2013 12:41pm
Commander of Awesome's avatar

Commander of Awesome

Senior Pwner

23,151 posts
Jan 10, 2013 12:43 PM
BR1986FB;1362916 wrote:Pretty sure he's a fan of the sister pumpin', floss with a ropin', banjo playin' on the stoop of the doublewide, Yinzer fan.
Would rep if I could. Well read again.
Jan 10, 2013 12:43pm
Crimson streak's avatar

Crimson streak

Senior Member

9,002 posts
Jan 10, 2013 12:54 PM
BR1986FB;1362915 wrote:Don't need to "rationalize" it. If someone like Kelly, Cowher, Gruden, Saban, etc said "no" to Cleveland and then "yes" to another team there might be something to your "nobody wants to coach here" theory.

Truth be told, Cleveland is a cherry job for any one of these coaches. Young, up & coming roster (Steelers & Ravens going to decline/OLD, too bad, so sad) along with $48.9 million in cap space ($35.5 million HAS to be used this year) and an owner who cares & is hungry. Not a bad place to be.

Add in an extremely passionate fan base. If you win in Cleveland you are a god there
Jan 10, 2013 12:54pm
T

Tiernan

Senior Member

13,021 posts
Jan 10, 2013 12:59 PM
I'm a huge Denver England Frisco Bay fan.
Jan 10, 2013 12:59pm
W

WebFire

Go Bucks!

14,779 posts
Jan 10, 2013 1:55 PM
like_that;1362898 wrote:Apparently this is all going over your head. You said nothing has changed. Well the old way for the Browns last ownership was to hire a guy immediately... This time around the Browns are interviewing numerous candidates to get the right choice. They haven't lost out on anyone. They didn't want Kelly after his interview. If they lost out on Kelly, he would have been coaching for another NFL team, not back at Oregon. And once again, as this went over your head the last time, the Browns have no had much change in ownership in their history. You are trying too hard.
Yeah ok.
Jan 10, 2013 1:55pm
T

Tiernan

Senior Member

13,021 posts
Jan 10, 2013 3:34 PM
Jimmy Boy is giving Wizenhunt another chance to say "No" according to ESPN @ 3:30pm. Not sure how this fits into JB's claims that he would be hiring "a name" coach...

but I gotta give the little shit credit he keeps plugging away and asking girls to the dance, even if it has to be the fat ugly ones nobody else asked.
Jan 10, 2013 3:34pm
T

Tiernan

Senior Member

13,021 posts
Jan 10, 2013 3:35 PM
Crimson streak;1362934 wrote: If you win in Cleveland you are a god there
If you win in Cleveland you are a socerer...
Jan 10, 2013 3:35pm
Automatik's avatar

Automatik

Senior Member

14,632 posts
Jan 10, 2013 3:37 PM
Tiernan;1363111 wrote:If you win in Cleveland you are a socerer...
lol



fyi, your sig is butchered.
Jan 10, 2013 3:37pm