G
great95
Posts: 48
Jan 19, 2013 7:53pm
what were the results for the upper weights like 220 and heavy
1
1prouddad
Posts: 440
Jan 19, 2013 8:08pm
As long as he can keep his weight down, that's the plan.lennyrox55;1369992 wrote:Does he plan on wrestling 160 at the watkins tourney?
Owens is a little dinged up -should be back soon. Just being cautious.
220 - Redman LV WBF over Northridge
HWT VanMeter LV 1 point decision over Northridge - can't remember exact score.
If you are looking for individual results for the whole tourney, not sure if Hamilton Twp will post or send to the Dispatch - Bribacker51 would be the one to ask.
bribacker51
Posts: 573
Jan 19, 2013 9:22pm
Crum and Jewell both were 5-0
1
1prouddad
Posts: 440
Jan 19, 2013 11:41pm
For LV Wogan C Nethers and McCown were 5-0. May have been one or two more. Cant remember every match.
B
bump_and_run
Posts: 321
Jan 20, 2013 12:00am
lol, heck that's worth $9.72 at least!! great job!1prouddad;1369946 wrote:Agreed. But when my son goes 5-0 and our backup 195 lb'r wins the tourney for us in the last 10 seconds the $8 is a little easier to swallow. Tourney run well. Refs were pretty good.
B
bump_and_run
Posts: 321
Jan 20, 2013 12:04am
i know every kid is different but i hate it when my kid bumps back up after cutting down. i swear cutting back down after getting fat again is worse than the first time. i tell him, if you want to wrestle up, wrestle up, but keep the weight down!!1prouddad;1370023 wrote:As long as he can keep his weight down, that's the plan.
1
1prouddad
Posts: 440
Jan 20, 2013 1:59am
. I dont see him going back up. He wants to go 60 the rest of the year.bump_and_run;1370149 wrote:i know every kid is different but i hate it when my kid bumps back up after cutting down. i swear cutting back down after getting fat again is worse than the first time. i tell him, if you want to wrestle up, wrestle up, but keep the weight down!!
B
basic
Posts: 33
Jan 20, 2013 1:36pm
Mifflin 120 m. Tate 5-0 with 5 pins
M
MPhillips
Posts: 383
Jan 20, 2013 1:52pm
Glad to see the Tate boys still at it. Always thought they had huge potential. They were just wee ones back then.
What happened to Hannibal at 152? He's ranked #2 in the Central District I thought?
What happened to Hannibal at 152? He's ranked #2 in the Central District I thought?
bribacker51
Posts: 573
Jan 20, 2013 6:45pm
He was at 160 lost 1 to Northridge 160 pinned Perez from HT not sure about his other matches but he looked good even in his loss.MPhillips;1370341 wrote:Glad to see the Tate boys still at it. Always thought they had huge potential. They were just wee ones back then.
What happened to Hannibal at 152? He's ranked #2 in the Central District I thought?
B
basic
Posts: 33
Jan 21, 2013 12:19am
H. Tate went 4-1
1
1prouddad
Posts: 440
Jan 21, 2013 12:38am
.basic;1370828 wrote:H. Tate went 4-1
What was the score in his loss to Mickey from Northridge?
bribacker51
Posts: 573
Jan 21, 2013 4:28am
3-1 I think