GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
Jan 4, 2013 12:42pm
ts1227;1357467 wrote:It needs to be done more. What is tricky is on these season long threads if you do it. They're banned for damn near a year unless someone remembers to unban them after a month (which is only fair IMO since everyone else gets a million chances)
If they don't want banned, don't troll.
ts1227
Posts: 12,319
Jan 4, 2013 12:47pm
GoChiefs;1357470 wrote:If they don't want banned, don't troll.
Then like_that needs thread banned for the next 11 months for telling someone to fuck off unprovoked
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Jan 4, 2013 12:48pm
ts1227;1357474 wrote:Then like_that needs thread banned for the next 11 months for telling someone to fuck off unprovoked
Lol fuck off and fuck yourself are not even close to the same thing.
ts1227
Posts: 12,319
Jan 4, 2013 12:49pm
wildcats20;1357475 wrote:Lol fuck off and fuck yourself are not even close to the same thing.
If someone says either of those to me, I'm taking it the exact same way. How are they different in any appreciable way?
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
Jan 4, 2013 12:54pm
ts1227;1357474 wrote:Then like_that needs thread banned for the next 11 months for telling someone to fuck off unprovoked
You can't thread ban him when nobody else has been getting banned for trolling.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Jan 4, 2013 12:58pm
GoChiefs;1357478 wrote:You can't thread ban him when nobody else has been getting banned for trolling.
Just because it was wrong in the past doesnt mean we shouldnt do it right going forward
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Jan 4, 2013 1:01pm
LJ;1357480 wrote:Just because it was wrong in the past doesnt mean we shouldnt do it right going forward
You set an ugly precedent by banning the retaliation and not the instigator.
Then again, that's what happens all the time.
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
Jan 4, 2013 1:01pm
LJ;1357480 wrote:Just because it was wrong in the past doesnt mean we shouldnt do it right going forward
Then I believe the correct thing to do would post a warning about it in the thread that going forward, trolling will result in a thread ban. You can't just ban him and then say going forward you will be thread banned.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Jan 4, 2013 1:02pm
wildcats20;1357482 wrote:You set an ugly precedent by banning the retaliation and not the instigator.
Then again, that's what happens all the time.
They were the instigators in that thread!!!!
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Jan 4, 2013 1:03pm
So jordo never trolled that thread? Never?LJ;1357486 wrote:They were the instigators in that thread!!!!
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Jan 4, 2013 1:04pm
wildcats20;1357488 wrote:So jordo never trolled that thread? Never?
I don't see it
ts1227
Posts: 12,319
Jan 4, 2013 1:06pm
They were thread banned from a thread for jumping thedynasty (who hasn't instigated a damn thing around here in about 18 months, if ever) on post number fucking one of a thread, had zero to do with jordo.
How does that set any bad precedent?
How does that set any bad precedent?
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Jan 4, 2013 1:07pm
ts1227;1357490 wrote:They were thread banned from a thread for jumping thedynasty (who hasn't instigated a damn thing around here in about 18 months, if ever) on post number fucking one of a thread, had zero to do with jordo.
How does that set any bad precedent?
Well considering the last however many posts have been about the Browns thread...
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
Jan 4, 2013 1:09pm
LJ;1357489 wrote:I don't see it
I guess Webbie wasn't trolling when he jumped in on that thread? He never posts in Browns threads.
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
Jan 4, 2013 1:10pm
ts1227;1357490 wrote:They were thread banned from a thread for jumping thedynasty (who hasn't instigated a damn thing around here in about 18 months, if ever) on post number fucking one of a thread, had zero to do with jordo.
How does that set any bad precedent?
That instance wasn't, but banning like_that from the Browns thread would be.
ts1227
Posts: 12,319
Jan 4, 2013 1:14pm
GoChiefs;1357496 wrote:That instance wasn't, but banning like_that from the Browns thread would be.
To an extent. That particular instance to jordo was unprovoked and only made because of who it was and not what they said, which is the issue.
I was just saying if we're going to ban people all year from season threads for trolling like a jordo, lotz, etc., posts like that have to be candidates too
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
Jan 4, 2013 1:16pm
ts1227;1357503 wrote:To an extent. That particular instance to jordo was unprovoked and only made because of who it was and not what they said, which is the issue.
I was just saying if we're going to ban people all year from season threads for trolling like a jordo, lotz, etc., posts like that have to be candidates too
As I mentioned, you almost have to put a warning in the thread before banning anyone.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Jan 4, 2013 1:16pm
GoChiefs;1357494 wrote:I guess Webbie wasn't trolling when he jumped in on that thread? He never posts in Browns threads.
Nope
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
Jan 4, 2013 1:18pm
LJ;1357505 wrote:Nope
Sorry, but I disagree. That was his purpose because he got asshurt about some other comments S&L made.
se-alum
Posts: 13,948
Jan 4, 2013 1:18pm
I rarely even notice jordo on Browns threads, so his trolling can't be that bad. My guess is he mostly does it in retaliation for being jumped for disagreeing with Browns fans.
I agree with GoChiefs, someone should post a warning, and from here on out it won't be tolerated.
I agree with GoChiefs, someone should post a warning, and from here on out it won't be tolerated.
ts1227
Posts: 12,319
Jan 4, 2013 1:20pm
GoChiefs;1357504 wrote:As I mentioned, you almost have to put a warning in the thread before banning anyone.
Absolutely in a thread like that. Now in that one last night there where they start derailing from post one there is no point in firing off a warning shot, it just needed fixed before the thread was DOA
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
Jan 4, 2013 1:21pm
I don't think anybody is disagreeing with the thread ban from last night. It was definitely a warranted ban.
ts1227
Posts: 12,319
Jan 4, 2013 1:22pm
GoChiefs;1357513 wrote:I don't think anybody is disagreeing with the thread ban from last night. It was definitely a warranted ban.
Yeah, I'm just trying to delineate since there's two topics at hand here (it started about last night and became Browns)
se-alum
Posts: 13,948
Jan 4, 2013 1:25pm
I went ahead and posted a warning. One of the big problems is, I, for instance, don't have the ability to unapprove posts in Pro forums, so even though a post my get infracted, it's still there for everyone to see and react to, causing a bigger shit storm.
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
Jan 4, 2013 1:28pm
se-alum;1357519 wrote:I went ahead and posted a warning. One of the big problems is, I, for instance, don't have the ability to unapprove posts in Pro forums, so even though a post my get infracted, it's still there for everyone to see and react to, causing a bigger shit storm.
And obviously everyones opinion of trolling is different.