ts1227
Posts: 12,319
Jan 3, 2013 11:36pm
ts1227 has reported a post.
Reason:
Forum: Serious Business
Assigned Moderators: N/A
Posted by: Commander of Awesome
Original Content:
Reason:
Post: Breckenridge/VailHim and like_that both posted this unprovoked (the first and third responses) I'm unapproving it, and thread banning. do they need a basement ban or infraction, in anyone's opinion?
Forum: Serious Business
Assigned Moderators: N/A
Posted by: Commander of Awesome
Original Content:
Yea, do us all a favor. Find a cliff and throw yourself off of it.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Jan 3, 2013 11:39pm
Infractions and corresponding bans imo
ts1227
Posts: 12,319
Jan 3, 2013 11:40pm
like literally, all the thread asked was "what do I do in Breckenridge" and they posted that as first reply. Fuck them, regardless of who the OP is.
I'm going to bed... if someone feels inclined to punish further have fun, otherwise I'll get whatever you all think we should do after work tomorrow night.
I'm going to bed... if someone feels inclined to punish further have fun, otherwise I'll get whatever you all think we should do after work tomorrow night.
se-alum
Posts: 13,948
Jan 4, 2013 8:00am
I think like_that needs banned from the Browns thread for a week or so as well. He's doing the same stuff, telling anyone he doesn't like to GTFO or F off.
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Jan 4, 2013 10:43am
se-alum;1357203 wrote:I think like_that needs banned from the Browns thread for a week or so as well. He's doing the same stuff, telling anyone he doesn't like to GTFO or F off.
Which breaks what rule exactly?
The Browns thread gets trolled on CONSTANTLY and nothing happens. The moment one of them does something semi against the rules, it's ban this person and ban that person.
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
Jan 4, 2013 10:47am
wildcats20;1357361 wrote:Which breaks what rule exactly?
The Browns thread gets trolled on CONSTANTLY and nothing happens. The moment one of them does something semi against the rules, it's ban this person and ban that person.
Couldn't agree more. Gibby has a past of troling the Browns threads, thats why he was responded to like that, plus like_that says he was a little intoxicated. But like you said, people troll that thread all the time and not a thing is done about it.
ts1227
Posts: 12,319
Jan 4, 2013 11:16am
I just don't see what you guys see on the Browns threads, and I'm a Browns fan.
Sports threads are going to have some dissent and jabbing, but no one really goes in there guns a blazing telling everyone to fuck off and the Browns suck donkey ass. We could probably do more on 20% of the comments (jordo, gibby) but the other 80% are CoA and like_that being oversensitive douchebags because the thread isn't operating as a single team circle jerk, or bitching at posters they don't like in their precious thread unprovoked.
Sports threads are going to have some dissent and jabbing, but no one really goes in there guns a blazing telling everyone to fuck off and the Browns suck donkey ass. We could probably do more on 20% of the comments (jordo, gibby) but the other 80% are CoA and like_that being oversensitive douchebags because the thread isn't operating as a single team circle jerk, or bitching at posters they don't like in their precious thread unprovoked.
se-alum
Posts: 13,948
Jan 4, 2013 11:19am
Ok, I agree, it makes for a good thread when jordo says he thinks Lovie would be a good hire, and then is instantly told to fuck off. Makes for good information.wildcats20;1357361 wrote:Which breaks what rule exactly?
The Browns thread gets trolled on CONSTANTLY and nothing happens. The moment one of them does something semi against the rules, it's ban this person and ban that person.
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
Jan 4, 2013 11:22am
ts1227;1357410 wrote:I just don't see what you guys see on the Browns threads, and I'm a Browns fan.
Sports threads are going to have some dissent and jabbing, but no one really goes in there guns a blazing telling everyone to fuck off and the Browns suck donkey ass. We could probably do more on 20% of the comments (jordo, gibby) but the other 80% are CoA and like_that being oversensitive douchebags because the thread isn't operating as a single team circle jerk, or bitching at posters they don't like in their precious thread unprovoked.
But in the past they have went in the Browns threads guns a blazing just to talk shit about the Browns. Thats why they aren't taken seriously whenever they post.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Jan 4, 2013 11:35am
ts1227;1357410 wrote:I just don't see what you guys see on the Browns threads, and I'm a Browns fan.
Sports threads are going to have some dissent and jabbing, but no one really goes in there guns a blazing telling everyone to fuck off and the Browns suck donkey ass. We could probably do more on 20% of the comments (jordo, gibby) but the other 80% are CoA and like_that being oversensitive douchebags because the thread isn't operating as a single team circle jerk, or bitching at posters they don't like in their precious thread unprovoked.
This this this this this
ts1227
Posts: 12,319
Jan 4, 2013 12:04pm
GoChiefs;1357414 wrote:But in the past they have went in the Browns threads guns a blazing just to talk shit about the Browns. Thats why they aren't taken seriously whenever they post.
Some of them have, yes. Jordo absolutely needed thread banned from a few game threads this year though he wasn't, but I'm not banning him upon sight from here on out. They told him to fuck him off for recommending Lovie Smith. His posting past does not give those assholes free reign to sidetrack a thread every goddamn time he posts.
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Jan 4, 2013 12:17pm
ts1227;1357444 wrote:Some of them have, yes. Jordo absolutely needed thread banned from a few game threads this year though he wasn't, but I'm not banning him upon sight from here on out. They told him to fuck him off for recommending Lovie Smith. His posting past does not give those assholes free reign to sidetrack a thread every goddamn time he posts.
So what rule did they break by saying fuck off?
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Jan 4, 2013 12:22pm
wildcats20;1357448 wrote:So what rule did they break by saying fuck off?
Constantly harassing
ts1227
Posts: 12,319
Jan 4, 2013 12:23pm
Fuck off has been considered an attack/name call since day 1. See durkie
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
Jan 4, 2013 12:24pm
ts1227;1357444 wrote:Some of them have, yes. Jordo absolutely needed thread banned from a few game threads this year though he wasn't, but I'm not banning him upon sight from here on out. They told him to fuck him off for recommending Lovie Smith. His posting past does not give those assholes free reign to sidetrack a thread every goddamn time he posts.
Posting past has everything to do with it, IMO. Nobody does anything, so they become assholes to the ones that troll. That seems to keep them at bay for the most part. You know jordo trolls Cleveland threads whenever he can. Said was bad about it for a while too, just because of who the Browns drafted last year.
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Jan 4, 2013 12:26pm
LJ;1357451 wrote:Constantly harassing
But constantly trolling threads is allowed?
se-alum
Posts: 13,948
Jan 4, 2013 12:30pm
I'm a Browns fan, and CoA and like_that are by far the most annoying posters in there.
ts1227
Posts: 12,319
Jan 4, 2013 12:30pm
I love how they bitch about lack of moderation on the Browns threads, and all season whined that they wanted mantooth back as a mod. While I love mantooth, he never moderated anything so they're just talking to hear themselves talk.
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
Jan 4, 2013 12:32pm
se-alum;1357458 wrote:I'm a Browns fan, and CoA and like_that are by far the most annoying posters in there.
I'm a Browns fan, and I agree they can be annoying, towards the known "Browns" trolls. Do I agree that all the ones they say troll Cleveland does? No. But a couple of them, they are right about.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Jan 4, 2013 12:32pm
wildcats20;1357455 wrote:But constantly trolling threads is allowed?
Where did he troll that thread?
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Jan 4, 2013 12:33pm
Why not thread ban jordo when he actually trolls?
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
Jan 4, 2013 12:35pm
LJ;1357462 wrote:Where did he troll that thread?
Come on LJ, its pretty well known that jordo trolls Cleveland threads. There is no way to deny that. Wildcats didn't specify that thread in particular.
ts1227
Posts: 12,319
Jan 4, 2013 12:38pm
LJ;1357463 wrote:Why not thread ban jordo when he actually trolls?
It needs to be done more. What is tricky is on these season long threads if you do it. They're banned for damn near a year unless someone remembers to unban them after a month (which is only fair IMO since everyone else gets a million chances)
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
Jan 4, 2013 12:40pm
LJ;1357463 wrote:Why not thread ban jordo when he actually trolls?
I agree, but no one does, even its reported at times, nothing was ever done about it.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Jan 4, 2013 12:40pm
GoChiefs;1357465 wrote:Come on LJ, its pretty well known that jordo trolls Cleveland threads. There is no way to deny that. Wildcats didn't specify that thread in particular.
He HAS, but he doesn't always. And it doesn't give coa and like that to harass him anytime he posts something legit. You can't post a dissenting opinion in a browns thread without those 2 going nuts. It's ridiculous