Azubuike24;1356130 wrote:Yeah, UL looks great thus far offensively. I'm just saying their D isn't any good and Florida isn't going to be their typical offensively-challenged selves.
We must be watching different games
Azubuike24;1356130 wrote:Yeah, UL looks great thus far offensively. I'm just saying their D isn't any good and Florida isn't going to be their typical offensively-challenged selves.
The game I'm watching, UL is moving the ball at will.dlazz;1356159 wrote:We must be watching different games
Crimson streak;1356188 wrote:Bridgewater is so good
Weak ass punch by #32 blue. A punch none the less, early shower.ptown_trojans_1;1356238 wrote:SEC thugs.
Way to be desperate Florida. Wow.
I've always been of the opinion that the SEC doesn't play good, disciplined defense. Their member schools usually outscore each other, like 40-38. They may be fast, they may hit hard (and pretty cheap, if tonight's game is any indication) but they don't wrap up and finish the hit. They're more about bluster and show, stripping the ball and making the Sportcenter reel than they are about good, solid defense. Watch next Monday and see if Notre Dame doesn't put up 35 or more against the Tide. Of course, Alabama may answer with 40 or 50, but they will give up a lot in order to score a lot. These teams must have loved Loyola-Marymount, lol.ptown_trojans_1;1356063 wrote:SEC! SEC!
Where is the defense?
That was way too easy.
The FB was wide open in the flat.
I bet growing up if the Big10 had an unranked team they'd of put someone else in therethavoice;1355639 wrote:Wait a minute here. You say you hate the rules that are ruining these amazing bowls you grew up with, yet want the rule to change that would have matched up two top ten teams in the Rose bowl with Stanford and Georgia.
WHich way do you want it?