SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Apr 25, 2013 8:57pm
I'm very happy with this..sheard mingo and kruger is a nasty DE group.
S
Sonofanump
Apr 25, 2013 8:58pm
I'm fine with the pick, no trade partners.
scoreboard
Posts: 326
Apr 25, 2013 8:58pm
[video=youtube;260jraqaArs][/video]
bases_loaded
Posts: 6,912
Apr 25, 2013 8:58pm
Is Sheard gone tomorrow now?
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
Apr 25, 2013 8:59pm
I actually dont hate this as much as I thought I did initially. Improves D-Line (in theory). Milliner wouldve been a waste. #2 CB at 6 wouldve been bad. This is better than Geno, Milliner, etc. We got fucked out of a trade by the 1st five picks, so I dont hate Mingo.
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Apr 25, 2013 9:00pm
Love it.
Also, you guys were all wrong.
Also, you guys were all wrong.
Crimson streak
Posts: 9,002
Apr 25, 2013 9:00pm
Mingo is an athletic freak and will play well in space. He ball hawks pretty well. I like it
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
Apr 25, 2013 9:00pm
You dont think Sheard is gone by tomorrow (or tomorrow sometime).SportsAndLady;1433854 wrote:I'm very happy with this..sheard mingo and kruger is a nasty DE group.
I think Browns try to move him for a pick.
Mulva
Posts: 13,650
Apr 25, 2013 9:00pm
Pretty indifferent here. Not ideal for me, but I don't hate it.
Mr Miyagi
Posts: 1,211
Apr 25, 2013 9:00pm
Bruce Irvin Seahawks 16 tackles 8 sacks. Mingo over or under 8 sacks next year?
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
Apr 25, 2013 9:01pm
I love the pick! There were some positions of need going into this draft and we just filled one of them with a BEAST.
How could you be THAT mad?!
How could you be THAT mad?!
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Apr 25, 2013 9:01pm
Mulva;1433864 wrote:Pretty indifferent here. Not ideal for me, but I don't hate it.
Those usually turn out to be pretty good picks.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Apr 25, 2013 9:03pm
Laley23;1433863 wrote:You dont think Sheard is gone by tomorrow (or tomorrow sometime).
I think Browns try to move him for a pick.
I think we'll keep him. Hes a good player, we shouldn't just send away good players because we got another one at his position. Just find a way to get these guys on the field as much as possible. Doesn't have to be every snap
Iliketurtles
Posts: 8,191
Apr 25, 2013 9:03pm
I go under.Mr Miyagi;1433865 wrote:Bruce Irvin Seahawks 16 tackles 8 sacks. Mingo over or under 8 sacks next year?
S
Sonofanump
Apr 25, 2013 9:05pm
Post #3519DeyDurkie5;1433860 wrote:Love it.
Also, you guys were all wrong.
scoreboard
Posts: 326
Apr 25, 2013 9:05pm
Agree 1000%SportsAndLady;1433869 wrote:I think we'll keep him. Hes a good player, we shouldn't just send away good players because we got another one at his position. Just find a way to get these guys on the field as much as possible. Doesn't have to be every snap
S
sportchampps
Posts: 7,361
Apr 25, 2013 9:07pm
Under 8 sacks for sure he only had 4 1/2 last year in college and 8 the year before
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
Apr 25, 2013 9:07pm
I agree. But I dont know if the Browns do. They didnt draft him, which is what I am basing that off of.SportsAndLady;1433869 wrote:I think we'll keep him. Hes a good player, we shouldn't just send away good players because we got another one at his position. Just find a way to get these guys on the field as much as possible. Doesn't have to be every snap
Mulva
Posts: 13,650
Apr 25, 2013 9:08pm
He didn't put up very big numbers last year, so I would guess people who are THAT mad would argue the beast point.lhslep134;1433867 wrote:I love the pick! There were some positions of need going into this draft and we just filled one of them with a BEAST.
How could you be THAT mad?!
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Apr 25, 2013 9:10pm
If you base your evaluation of a player on "numbers" then you are a retard.Mulva;1433879 wrote:He didn't put up very big numbers last year, so I would guess people who are THAT mad would argue the beast point.
mucalum49
Posts: 1,639
Apr 25, 2013 9:11pm
I wanted Milliner but I'm OK with Mingo. Just hope we upgrade the secondary sooner than later.
Pick6
Posts: 14,946
Apr 25, 2013 9:12pm
But he is known to take plays off. Hopefully that changes.DeyDurkie5;1433884 wrote:If you base your evaluation of a player on "numbers" then you are a retard.
IggyPride00
Posts: 6,482
Apr 25, 2013 9:12pm
Lombardi and Banner must love Mingo, because STL just gave Buffalo their 2nd round pick to trade up.
Considering Banner was supposedly playing the league like a fiddle today, he had to have known he could be their trade partner. Opted to make the pick instead.
Considering Banner was supposedly playing the league like a fiddle today, he had to have known he could be their trade partner. Opted to make the pick instead.
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
Apr 25, 2013 9:13pm
Yeah, LSU was so stacked defensively I wouldnt look at his numbers. I would look at a few things:
- What does he look like in coverage?
- Does he miss open field tackles?
- Does he have speed to the outside and moves to the inside on his rushes?
- What is his closing speed?
mucalum49
Posts: 1,639
Apr 25, 2013 9:13pm
Les Miles is pretty ballsy about who takes plays off but Mingo isn't on his list..Pick6;1433888 wrote:But he is known to take plays off. Hopefully that changes.
