Michigan shouldn't have a problem this week. I say Michigan by at least 14, but wouldn't be surprised if closer. Northwestern gave Michigan fits because of the option, which they struggle defending. But Iowa will not present that this week.
No way does Ferentz get fired, even if he loses these last two games. His buyout is enormous and I doubt the university is willing to take on that financial burden (it would be about $250,000 a month, every month, until January 2020, or $3 million a year).vball10set;1318528 wrote:This game will be the final nail in Ferentz's coffin...tsun big, very big
He signed a 10-year, $39 million contract in February 2010: http://hawkcentral.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/ferentzcontract.pdfWebFire;1318540 wrote:How long is his contract?
We'll see, rocks, and ya' gotta' love those famous last words, "no way"gorocks99;1318537 wrote:No way does Ferentz get fired, even if he loses these last two games. His buyout is enormous and I doubt the university is willing to take on that financial burden (it would be about $250,000 a month, every month, until January 2020, or $3 million a year).
Well, Iowa deserves what they are getting then.gorocks99;1318543 wrote:He signed a 10-year, $39 million contract in February 2010: http://hawkcentral.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/ferentzcontract.pdf
If he is terminated "without cause," that is, without violating rules/without being physically unable to perform his job, he gets paid 75% of his guaranteed amount (base salary [~$2m per year], plus supplemental payments [~$1.5m-$2m per year]) for the remainder of the contract.
Oh, absolutely, it's a ludicrous contract - conceived solely because when Cap'n Kirk went to the Orange Bowl, everyone thought he would ditch Iowa for the NFL and Iowa foresaw themselves sliding into mediocrity as a result, so they gave him an offer he essentially couldn't refuse. Turns out they slid into mediocrity regardless.WebFire;1318597 wrote:Well, Iowa deserves what they are getting then.
:thumbup:WebFire;1318597 wrote:Well, Iowa deserves what they are getting then.
I'll agree to this. Iowa has always been the type of program that rebuilds, develops, and is good in a cycle of 3-4 years. Unlike Michigan, OSU... they don't get elite talent every year, so they develop the 2-3 stars athletes they get into solid players that fit the "tough nose" type of system. I think Hawkeye fans are ok with this cycle.0311sdp;1319080 wrote:Michigan 42 Iowa 13. Iowa will be decent again in a year or two, like most of the B1G teams this season they play a lot of young players. Ferentz has always been loved by the media and thus over-rated as a coach. As for deserving what they are getting, they are getting what Iowa has always gotten good some years, bad some years. They are not an elite program.
If that game ends with Michigan in the victory formation, I full expect Denard to take a knee.JU-ICE;1320459 wrote:I would not be surprised to see him on the field in some fashion, even if for a token play.
You mean last 2 seasons.Pick6;1322147 wrote:This is how Michigan should have been using Denard all this season IMO