TIEBREAKERS

Two-team tie
1. Results of head-to-head competition during the regular-season.
2. Each team's record vs. the team occupying the highest position in the final regular-season standings (or in the case of a tie for the championship, the next highest position in the regular-season standings), continuing down through the standings until one team gains an advantage.
a) When arriving at another pair of tied teams while comparing records, use each team's record against the collective tied teams as a group (prior to their own tie-breaking procedures), rather than the performance against the individual tied teams.
b) When comparing records against a single team or group of teams, the higher winning percentage shall prevail, even if the number of games played against the team or group are unequal (i.e., 2-0 is better than 3-1, but 2-0 is not better than 1-0).
3. Won-loss percentage of all Division I opponents.
4. Coin toss conducted by the commissioner or designee.

Multiple-team tie
1. Results of head-to-head competition during the regular-season.
a) When comparing records against the tied teams, the team with the higher winning percentage shall prevail, even if the number of games played against the team or group are unequal (i.e., 2-0 is better than 3-1, but 2-0 is not better than 1-0).
b) After the top team among the tied teams is determined, the second team is ranked by its record among the original tied teams, not the head-to-head record vs. the remaining team(s).
2. If the remaining teams are still tied, each tied team's record shall be compared to the team occupying the highest position in the final regular-season standings, continuing down through the standings until one team gains an advantage.
a) When arriving at another pair of tied teams while comparing records, use each team's record against the collective tied teams as a group (prior to their own tie-breaking procedures), rather than the performance against the individual tied teams.
b) When comparing records against a single team or group of teams, the higher winning percentage shall prevail, even if the number of games played against the team or group are unequal (i.e., 2-0 is better than 3-1, but 2-0 is not better than 1-0).
3. Won-loss percentage of Division I opponents.
4. Coin toss conducted by commissioner or designee.

Laley23;1399704 wrote:Thats only for seeding in th BTT though. The B1G recognizes everyone as a co-champ if they tie. Even if the one team is 2-0 against the other team, etc.

gorocks99;1400789 wrote:Iowa gets one they had to get, beating Illinois. Still a lot of work for them to make the tourney, but it's still feasible

Heretic;1401297 wrote:Yeah. I didn't realize when I was doing my "on the bubble or not" deal about them last week, just how poor their RPI and SoS were. That had me a bit surprised seeing the 100+ SoS, so yeah. They'll have to win their last game and probably get two in the B1G tournament to have a real shot. And who knows who their second-round game will be against, as there could wind up being a 4-way tie with Indiana, Michigan, Ohio State and whoever wins the Mich St.-Wisconsin game for the top four seeds.

WebFire;1401314 wrote:This bodes well for Michigan, OSU and the rest that are hoping for a UM victory and a share of the B1G title. Indiana has already celebrated their share of the crown, so hopefully they won't play inspired ball.

This was at Assembly Hall last night. Not sure exactly when they did it. Assuming sometime pre-game.

Laley23;1401318 wrote:Post game, after the SR speeches and after the trophy presentation. I cant figure out why everyone is all up in arms about everything. IU did the same stuff in 2002 and for their entire existence lol. Always have SR speeches after the last home game, trophy is always at the place when a team can or has clinched (I think it will be at Michigan Sunday...thats the only other game where a result will directly effect who wins), and they always cut down the nets after their final home game of a title winning season.

Laley23;1401318 wrote:Post game, after the SR speeches and after the trophy presentation. I cant figure out why everyone is all up in arms about everything. IU did the same stuff in 2002 and for their entire existence lol. Always have SR speeches after the last home game, trophy is always at the place when a team can or has clinched (I think it will be at Michigan Sunday...thats the only other game where a result will directly effect who wins), and they always cut down the nets after their final home game of a title winning season.

WebFire;1401323 wrote:Though it would be weird to do after losing the game.

sleeper;1401331 wrote:Michigan is going to beat Indiana. Book it.

WebFire;1401321 wrote:I'm not up in arms. I just said that I hope they don't play inspired since they don't seem to have much to play for. They've got their trophy, and their nets cut. Good time for Michigan to have the mental edge.

vball10set;1401341 wrote:Have no problem whatsoever with having the senior night ceremony after the game, and maybe even the trophy presentation (which could very well be shared), but cutting down the nets? Just not a fan of it, that's all.