SportsAndLady;1301009 wrote:Lol only in Cleveland do you hear this shit, man.

"If you just take out one game, he's been decent."

"our offense is playing well" 13 points against the lowly Colts

"our coach calls bad plays that make our QB look bad"

"I'm not going to blame it on the offense because they usually score 22 points a game."

BR1986FB;1301016 wrote:And only in Cleveland do you hear "we have to tank the season so we have the first pick in the draft cuz I don't wike the QB." Rooting against your own team. Worst. "Fan." Ever.

shook_17;1300946 wrote:^^ lol what does weeden have to do with the the defense letting luck and vick ballard have their way with our defense. you are a fucking ididot. aren't you a cowboys fan?

zach24oz;1301020 wrote:I'm not sure who said anything about the coach calling bad plays to make the QB look bad...if anything Weeden has shown the ability to throw the deep ball like Shurmur is calling, it's up to the ohter guys to catch it...and he did have a terrible game, no one is saying he didn't...just saying that if he didnt have that collapse of a game, he's solid, and since then he has been pretty good IMO, besides some bad throws, and there's a difference between the O playing well and the QB playing well...when the QB is putting the ball where it's supposed to be, that's not on him and with the lack of a running game that doesnt help anyone. And the D needs to do a better job against feaking Ballard. I've never even heard of that guy.

Weeden had a bad 2nd half because Shurmur called fucking 40 yard passes every other play.

Pick6;1301027 wrote:Also, I take it you resort to a personal attack because you dont have a valid point, you just like to be up BR's butthole.

Go fuck yourself.

IggyPride00;1300882 wrote:I am not going to search through the threads, but anyone who said they were even open to it with a strong finish was clearly just delusional from the win.

I didn't care if Shurmur won 11 in a row to end it, he needs to be fired because what we saw today is who he is and always will be.

SportsAndLady;1301026 wrote:Indianapolis fans laugh at you.

Heres another one

"Our offense is finally somewhat respectable, this QB will be here for 5 years!"

SportsAndLady;1301030 wrote:Here ya go



Here's how it would have happened if Gordon catches that ball. Luck would take them down the field and score to win it. Defense sucks, it's their fault. It's never Weeden's fault.

Pick6;1301027 wrote:17 points is really having the way with our defense. :rolleyes:

Also, I take it you resort to a personal attack because you dont have a valid point, you just like to be up BR's butthole.

Go **** yourself.

SportsAndLady;1301030 wrote:Here ya go



Here's how it would have happened if Gordon catches that ball. Luck would take them down the field and score to win it. Defense sucks, it's their fault. It's never Weeden's fault.

BR1986FB;1301046 wrote:And why SHOULD it be Weeden's fault? He played a near flawless game. Clearly outplayed Luck.

SportsAndLady;1301030 wrote: Here's how it would have happened if Gordon catches that ball. Luck would take them down the field and score to win it. Defense sucks, it's their fault. It's never Weeden's fault.

Crimson streak;1301043 wrote:Weedon played good today. Is the loss on him? No it's on Gordon and hodges. And shurmer. The d played horrible the first half but stepped it up the 2nd half. There is no reason we should have lost this game

dazedconfused;1301055 wrote:it seems as if you want it to always be weeden's fault to promote your own agenda against him.

BR1986FB;1301041 wrote:Oh my, you can tell you're young...and not very intelligent (but most of us knew that). You might want to do a bit of research on Weeden...this guy isn't the scrub you want to portray him as. He may not get the trophies that Otto Graham had but this guy is putting up some of the BEST numbers in the HISTORY of the Cleveland Browns. That includes the beloved Kosar & Sipe. Put a defense behind him and this guy will win some games...A LOT of them.

SportsAndLady;1301058 wrote:No I agree..well sort of. Weeden looked okay, not good. You don't look good putting up 13 points. My point is that no one wants to blame Weeden, ever.

They just "forget" about the 1st game. Just throw it away. Forget that the defense actually played really well and Weeden blew a great opportunity. Wash their hands of that game.

SportsAndLady;1301058 wrote:No I agree..well sort of. Weeden looked okay, not good. You don't look good putting up 13 points. My point is that no one wants to blame Weeden, ever.

They just "forget" about the 1st game. Just throw it away. Forget that the defense actually played really well and Weeden blew a great opportunity. Wash their hands of that game.

SportsAndLady;1301061 wrote:I don't give a shit that you are old and remember all of these old players.

SportsAndLady;1301066 wrote:Whatever, I'm not going to change my mind; you're not going to change your (delusional) minds.

When we're 8-8 in 5 years, I'll come back to say i told you so.

Crimson streak;1301071 wrote:Yeah cause geno smith or some other shitastic qb in this draft is going to. If there was a luck or rg3 in this draft I would honestly take a qb but there's not all these qbs have a huge bust factor to them. I would rather build up the rest of the team with weedon at qb than waste a first rounder on a qb that will probably bust.

BR1986FB;1301069 wrote:Weeden's still the best QB this team has seen in a very LONG time

SportsAndLady;1301074 wrote:Which is what you base your argument on..which is what you're not seeing here.

In a hypothetical situation, just because the 8th best player out of 10 is better than the 9th and 10th, doesn't mean he's any good.