5 trurnovers and should have been 6. OIC. McCoy should have been in the game after the missed Philly field goal...and at the end of the game.IggyPride00;1265933 wrote:This was a bizarre game.
It was an all american effort by the D, and yet they got gouged for 460 yards of offense.
We get 4 turnovers, the Eagles had 12 penalties for over 100 yards, and yet find a way to lose the game.
Would anyone have found that imaginable before the start of the game?
I hope the defense comes out and talks shit about Shumur and his offense, because it is criminal that they had to lose the game because of the ineptitude of their head coach and the side of the ball he insists on controlling like Stalin as far as the playcalling.
IggyPride00;1265933 wrote:This was a bizarre game.
It was an all american effort by the D, and yet they got gouged for 460 yards of offense.
We get 4 turnovers, the Eagles had 12 penalties for over 100 yards, and yet find a way to lose the game.
Would anyone have found that imaginable before the start of the game?
I hope the defense comes out and talks shit about Shumur and his offense, because it is criminal that they had to lose the game because of the ineptitude of their head coach and the side of the ball he insists on controlling like Stalin as far as the playcalling.
QB controversy????!!!!IggyPride00;1265941 wrote:The QB controversy has already started.
OIC.
Maybe it will shame them into working harder and looking like an NFL unit next week.like_that;1265945 wrote:Yeah iggy, that's exactly what the team needs. The defense really should publicly call out the offense. That will turn this season around!!!
Yep. This guy gets it (and has gotten it from the beginning).2kool4skool;1265951 wrote:Remember when people thought drafting a 30 year old system QB in the first round was a good idea?
In before: "It's only the first game. Typical Browns fans over reacting."
No, fuck Weeden. I know it was a home game, but they should fly the team to a different city, just so they can forbid him on the plane ride home.
derek bomar;1265956 wrote:honestly, he's terrible. yes, it's one game. but god damn it'd be nice to see RG3 in Cleveland. Did you see what that ****er did today? God Damn.
SportsAndLady;1265957 wrote:Yep. This guy gets it (and has gotten it from the beginning).
Really it wouldn't have mattered. Do you think RGIII would have had 320 yds and 2 TD's in this offense? Maybe over the course of 4-5 games total, but he would be castrated just like any other QB in a shurmur offense.derek bomar;1265956 wrote:honestly, he's terrible. yes, it's one game. but god damn it'd be nice to see RG3 in Cleveland. Did you see what that ****er did today? God Damn.
No admission here. He looked like shit today but I'm not passing judgment yet.SportsAndLady;1265947 wrote: I'm just waiting for you, BR, and the rest of the gang to admit he was a terrible pick. He fucking sucks.
He's looked OK against the Saints.derek bomar;1265956 wrote: but god damn it'd be nice to see RG3 in Cleveland. Did you see what that fucker did today? God Damn.
Yeah....2 lob interceptions down the right sideline by Cromartie...and 2 wide open receivers in the endzone overthrown by 10 yards.IggyPride00;1265944 wrote:Brinda just asked a good question.
Were any other plays called that Richardson up the middle and a slant?
True.said_aouita;1265973 wrote:It's a good thing the Browns didn't go "all-in" on rgiii. He was horrible today.