Please explain how they aren't the main backers of his campaignfish82;1263246 wrote:Your utter lack of political acumen never ceases to impress.
Huh....kinda like the "disappointed,disgruntled" Obama supporter from the newest Romney commerical works for the RNCQuakerOats;1263254 wrote:http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/09/steelworker-featured-at-dnc-didnt-work-for-bain/
Yikes, a BIG lie from a union organizer .......say it ain't so.
LOL, when I saw earlier today that three former Bain people were going to speak at the DNC I thought "oh oh, this could be bad for Romney". But as it turns out, I guess it's just three people who "allegedly" worked at Bain portfolio companies. Of course you can always cherry pick some disgruntled workers, probably even from successes. I just hope it backfires and hope America can see through a very transparent attack.QuakerOats;1263254 wrote:http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/09/steelworker-featured-at-dnc-didnt-work-for-bain/
Yikes, a BIG lie from a union organizer .......say it ain't so.
Not sure that necessarily indicates any shenanigans. A disillusioned Obama supporter certainly could join Romney's campaign. The definitely happened with some Repubs in 2008 for Obama.Ty Webb;1263257 wrote:Huh....kinda like the "disappointed,disgruntled" Obama supporter from the newest Romney commerical works for the RNC
gut;1263265 wrote:Not sure that necessarily indicates any shenanigans. A disillusioned Obama supporter certainly could join Romney's campaign. The definitely happened with some Repubs in 2008 for Obama.
If you're talking about the Citizen's United movie then, yeah, cherry-picked testimonies is just gutter politics.
gut;1263265 wrote:Not sure that necessarily indicates any shenanigans. A disillusioned Obama supporter certainly could join Romney's campaign. The definitely happened with some Repubs in 2008 for Obama.
If you're talking about the Citizen's United movie then, yeah, cherry-picked testimonies is just gutter politics.
How about I let the NY Times explain it to you.Ty Webb;1263255 wrote:Please explain how they aren't the main backers of his campaign
fish82;1263271 wrote:How about I let the NY Times explain it to you.
http://elections.nytimes.com/2012/campaign-finance
17% of money spent on Romney's behalf is from PACs. Also worth noting is that Obama should probably stop crying about being "outspent."
Bam has gone dark in MI as well. Is he "giving up?" :rolleyes:
Or 2.4 points. :rolleyes:Ty Webb;1263273 wrote:Considering he's ahead by 7-10 points and Romney is leaving....why should he spend moneythere?
I guess if you throw out the 3 polls with the smallest MOE clearly indicating it's a toss-up, and add a few points to Obama....Ty Webb;1263273 wrote:Considering he's ahead by 7-10 points and Romney is leaving....why should he spend moneythere?
In his defense, the DNC email probably still had last week's poll. I'm sure there was good explanation.fish82;1263274 wrote:Or 2.4 points. :rolleyes:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/mi/michigan_romney_vs_obama-1811.html
They actually quit at the same time, so Romney leaving had zero to do with it.
If its truly a toss-up....why aren't either advertising there?gut;1263275 wrote:I guess if you throw out the 3 polls with the smallest MOE clearly indicating it's a toss-up, and add a few points to Obama....
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/mi/michigan_romney_vs_obama-1811.html
Many reasons, they just haven't purchased new ads and probably won't tip their plans to (among other reasons).Ty Webb;1263277 wrote:If its truly a toss-up....why aren't either advertising there?
Well said. No one "pulls out" of a state unless they start shutting down offices.gut;1263280 wrote:Many reasons, they just haven't purchased new ads and probably won't tip their plans to (among other reasons).
Michigan doesn't have early voting is probably another big determinant. They can hold off to see how debates are going before determining how much they want to spend there.
Just a couple of nuances to consider before you ruin another pair of underwear every time your inbox chimes predicting an Obama victory.
And it was really about the SuperPac pulling out, not Romney. It's likely the SuperPac is starting to run low on money, having carried most of Romney's ads the past few months, and is focusing its remaining resources where people are voting early. PA doesn't have early voting, either.fish82;1263281 wrote:Well said. No one "pulls out" of a state unless they start shutting down offices.
Ummm, because they don't need them to win.Ty Webb;1263277 wrote:If its truly a toss-up....why aren't either advertising there?
Ty Webb;1263267 wrote:She worked on Mccains campaign in 2008
They've actually got people cheering their made-up Repub agenda that they oppose.sleeper;1263385 wrote:The DNC is such a joke. It's scary that people eat up this rhetoric.
Apparently while Obama was Prez. It is truly shocking how far off the mainstream the DEMs have gone, it isn't even left-wing. It is just plain stupid.gut;1263387 wrote:Biden is awful. I said before, this is the great strawman campaign. Biden actually said "so women can take back control of their bodies". Ummm, when did they lose control of their bodies?
the day president romney's first supreme court appointee ascends to the bench.gut;1263387 wrote:Biden is awful. I said before, this is the great strawman campaign. Biden actually said "so women can take back control of their bodies". Ummm, when did they lose control of their bodies?
If you believe that you are the archetypical DEM. At any rate does Biden not understand English uses of tense? No because he's an idiot and he's Joe Biden who has a completely fictitious job. We have elected a Pres/VP with a VP who would never be President. If something were to incapacitate Obama tomorrow Biden would have to reappoint a successor. The U.S. would riot before he was President because even DEMs know he's a complete moron.isadore;1263405 wrote:the day president romney's first supreme court appointee ascends to the bench.
