Q
queencitybuckeye
Posts: 7,117
Jul 11, 2012 7:00am
Yes, because there's no middle ground between the police state that was JJ and total anarchy. :rolleyes:hoops23;1222967 wrote: Funny how this site was spun from JJ Huddle to try and be what that site wasn't, but now it's suddenly taking a turn to becoming what that site is...
Raw Dawgin' it
Posts: 11,466
Jul 11, 2012 7:10am
Welcome to the club Hoops! lol if they reverse it, no one knows what the fucking rules are here.
Also - fuck wildcats, that idiot should've been banned from what he posted in the initial rules thread.
Also - fuck wildcats, that idiot should've been banned from what he posted in the initial rules thread.
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Jul 11, 2012 7:25am
hoops23;1223144 wrote:And it wasn't reversed, as I'm still banned lol. Whatever.
The infraction was reversed.
Raw Dawgin' it
Posts: 11,466
Jul 11, 2012 7:28am
lol no one knows what the fuck is going on.
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
Jul 11, 2012 8:26am
I went in and lifted the ban on hoops.
Raw Dawgin' it
Posts: 11,466
Jul 11, 2012 8:30am
Why? Seriously, how was I the only one who's been banned for doing shit people on here do everyday. You fuckers are retards at enforcing the "new" rules.wes_mantooth;1223206 wrote:I went in and lifted the ban on hoops.
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
Jul 11, 2012 8:34am
no idea what you are talking about. I just read that hoops had an infraction reversed but it still kept him banned....so I made it right. Sorry for being retarded.Raw Dawgin' it;1223213 wrote:Why? Seriously, how was I the only one who's been banned for doing shit people on here do everyday. You fuckers are retards at enforcing the "new" rules.
Raw Dawgin' it
Posts: 11,466
Jul 11, 2012 8:36am
Wait...reversed the infraction but kept the ban....that doesn't make sense to me.wes_mantooth;1223221 wrote:no idea what you are talking about. I just read that hoops had an infraction reversed but it still kept him banned....so I made it right. Sorry for being retarded.
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
Jul 11, 2012 8:38am
yeah, apparently...the software allowed them to reverse the infraction, but it didn't kick out the basement ban. So I went into the administrative shit and manually took off the ban.Raw Dawgin' it;1223223 wrote:Wait...reversed the infraction but kept the ban....that doesn't make sense to me.
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Jul 11, 2012 8:39am
Raw Dawgin' it;1223223 wrote:Wait...reversed the infraction but kept the ban....that doesn't make sense to me.
I reversed the infraction. I can't reverse the ban. I assumed it was all one process, obviously it wasn't.
Raw Dawgin' it
Posts: 11,466
Jul 11, 2012 8:42am
Right - but why reverse the infraction and ban? There's no structure with the rules. He calls someone a liberal piece of garbage it's cool i call someone fucking lame I'm banned.wes_mantooth;1223225 wrote:yeah, apparently...the software allowed them to reverse the infraction, but it didn't kick out the basement ban. So I went into the administrative shit and manually took off the ban.
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
Jul 11, 2012 8:52am
I really have no idea because I didn't read the thread, but they said he was just joking around. They infracted and then discussed it in the mod lounge...decided to reverse it.Raw Dawgin' it;1223228 wrote:Right - but why reverse the infraction and ban? There's no structure with the rules. He calls someone a liberal piece of garbage it's cool i call someone fucking lame I'm banned.
My only thing was that I can get in the admin thing...whereas some mods can't. As for your infraction, I never saw it.....so I really couldn't tell you what happened.
Tigerfan00
Posts: 3,427
Jul 11, 2012 11:51am
Do you guys have TV's and vending machines in the mod lounge?wes_mantooth;1223243 wrote:I really have no idea because I didn't read the thread, but they said he was just joking around. They infracted and then discussed it in the mod lounge...decided to reverse it.
My only thing was that I can get in the admin thing...whereas some mods can't. As for your infraction, I never saw it.....so I really couldn't tell you what happened.
I remember ts1227(C4F 2.0) giving me a warning for saying "the OP is an idiot" after mcburg started a thread saying that exact same thing and it was clearly just a joke and mcburg didnt even say anything about it.
Im guessing ts1227 was bored and there was no one around in the mod lounge to discuss it with so he deleted my post and gave me a warning over nothing.
se-alum
Posts: 13,948
Jul 11, 2012 12:04pm
Agree, I gave the original infraction to hoops23 based on rule #1.Raw Dawgin' it;1223228 wrote:Right - but why reverse the infraction and ban? There's no structure with the rules. He calls someone a liberal piece of garbage it's cool i call someone fucking lame I'm banned.
Then it was reversed?1.) No personal attacks or unwarranted name-calling. Just because someone has a different opinion doesn't mean they're an idiot.
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
Jul 11, 2012 12:11pm
se-alum;1223401 wrote:Agree, I gave the original infraction to hoops23 based on rule #1.
Then it was reversed?
Yep, someone reversed it, so I lifted the ban.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Jul 11, 2012 12:14pm
The precedent has now been set that you can call someone a "Liberal piece of trash" without getting an infraction.
This is why the rules are broken.
This is why the rules are broken.
Q
queencitybuckeye
Posts: 7,117
Jul 11, 2012 12:16pm
Should redundancy be against the rules?sleeper;1223416 wrote:The precedent has now been set that you can call someone a "Liberal piece of trash" without getting an infraction.
This is why the rules are broken.
ts1227
Posts: 12,319
Jul 11, 2012 12:19pm
Raw Dawgin' it;1223228 wrote:Right - but why reverse the infraction and ban? There's no structure with the rules. He calls someone a liberal piece of garbage it's cool i call someone fucking lame I'm banned.
Some of this shit will happen simply because the rules are somewhat grey. By not making a laundry list of overly restrictive rules ala JJ, there will be a grey area by nature. It's just being exploited more because the mods are actually enforcing instead of being lax as fuck as the site spun out of control like we were for the past year. But we have the ability to reverse if other mods think it was BS. It all works out.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Jul 11, 2012 12:19pm
I believe that is the OC's reasoning behind reversing the infraction. 2 negatives equals a positive, so in OC logic this was a compliment.queencitybuckeye;1223418 wrote:Should redundancy be against the rules?
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Jul 11, 2012 12:20pm
JJ has less rules than the OC.ts1227;1223419 wrote:Some of this shit will happen simply because the rules are somewhat grey. By not making a laundry list of overly restrictive rules ala JJ, there will be a grey area by nature. It's just being exploited more because the mods are actually enforcing instead of being lax as fuck as the site spun out of control like we were for the past year.
ts1227
Posts: 12,319
Jul 11, 2012 12:21pm
sleeper;1223421 wrote:JJ has less rules than the OC.
OK, we'll start enforcing all of JJs unwritten rules here too
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Jul 11, 2012 12:22pm
You mean like the unwritten rule that you can't call LJ an expert?ts1227;1223424 wrote:OK, we'll start enforcing all of JJs unwritten rules here too
ts1227
Posts: 12,319
Jul 11, 2012 12:24pm
sleeper;1223427 wrote:You mean like the unwritten rule that you can't call LJ an expert?
yep
Heretic
Posts: 18,820
Jul 11, 2012 12:25pm
lol...JJ had a list of 23 or 24 rules. When they made the site free, they made a bit deal out of condensing them into 3 or 4 rules. But the old guard still enforced all those rules that supposedly no longer existed. The only place anything really changed there was on the surface --- but the enforcing and general douchebaggery stayed the same.sleeper;1223421 wrote:JJ has less rules than the OC.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Jul 11, 2012 12:26pm
Or how about the unwritten rule that if you are not an North Dakota fan and you post in a North Dakota thread, you are banned. But if you are not a fan of an Ohio based team, you can troll, thread de-rail, etc. any thread you want.ts1227;1223430 wrote:yep