Reds @ Indians..... Game 3

Home ▸ Archive ▸ Pro Sports ▸ Reds @ Indians..... Game 3
wildcats20's avatar

wildcats20

In ROY I Trust!!

27,794 posts
Jun 20, 2012 9:04 PM
Midstate01;1206666 wrote:MLB will take the error away right??
I was just thinking that...

There is NO WAY you can give a player an error when it was clearly a shit call.
Jun 20, 2012 9:04pm
wildcats20's avatar

wildcats20

In ROY I Trust!!

27,794 posts
Jun 20, 2012 9:05 PM
Then again, I don't know why Joey didn't just turn and jog to the bag.
Jun 20, 2012 9:05pm
justincredible's avatar

justincredible

Nick Mangold

32,056 posts
Jun 20, 2012 9:06 PM
Midstate01;1206666 wrote:MLB will take the error away right??
I would hope so. Joey shouldn't be charge with an error on that.
Jun 20, 2012 9:06pm
justincredible's avatar

justincredible

Nick Mangold

32,056 posts
Jun 20, 2012 9:06 PM
This game is horse shit.
Jun 20, 2012 9:06pm
wildcats20's avatar

wildcats20

In ROY I Trust!!

27,794 posts
Jun 20, 2012 9:06 PM
They need to inform the league office that they are playing the rest of the game under protest.



Not that that will do anything.
Jun 20, 2012 9:06pm
BRF's avatar

BRF

Senior Member

8,748 posts
Jun 20, 2012 9:07 PM
Midstate01;1206650 wrote:Oh it's over.
Good call, my Reds fan!
Jun 20, 2012 9:07pm
Midstate01's avatar

Midstate01

Senior Member

14,766 posts
Jun 20, 2012 9:08 PM
wildcats20;1206672 wrote:They need to inform the league office that they are playing the rest of the game under protest.



Not that that will do anything.

We were gonna lose regardless. But that call was complete shit.
Jun 20, 2012 9:08pm
BRF's avatar

BRF

Senior Member

8,748 posts
Jun 20, 2012 9:10 PM
wildcats20;1206672 wrote:They need to inform the league office that they are playing the rest of the game under protest.
In the old days, you had to say that before the next pitch. Not sure how that works these days.
Jun 20, 2012 9:10pm
wildcats20's avatar

wildcats20

In ROY I Trust!!

27,794 posts
Jun 20, 2012 9:10 PM
Midstate01;1206674 wrote:We were gonna lose regardless. But that call was complete shit.
I don't disagree, but 5-0 is a hell of a lot more doable than 8-0.
Jun 20, 2012 9:10pm
Midstate01's avatar

Midstate01

Senior Member

14,766 posts
Jun 20, 2012 9:10 PM
Shitsburgh just tied it up with the twins
Jun 20, 2012 9:10pm
Midstate01's avatar

Midstate01

Senior Member

14,766 posts
Jun 20, 2012 9:10 PM
wildcats20;1206677 wrote:I don't disagree, but 5-0 is a hell of a lot more doable than 8-0.

I agree there.
Jun 20, 2012 9:10pm
F

Footwedge

Senior Member

9,265 posts
Jun 20, 2012 9:11 PM
Unfortunately the error will stand. But in my view, the ss should get the errorr, not Votto. Come on, the throw was not that bad.

It's too bad that a play like that can't be reviewed. But in baseball, you can't really review something like that because there are no dead balls like other sports.
Jun 20, 2012 9:11pm
M

mhs95_06

Senior Member

8,167 posts
Jun 20, 2012 9:13 PM
mhs95_06;1206583 wrote:The Reds need to score 8 to have a chance to win, depending on how many runs Dusty leaves Bronson in there for. I'm afraid the Indians lefties will tattoo Bronson.
Even 8 won't win it now, after 3 unearned runs off Simon after one of the worst calls I've ever seen an ump make that prolongs the Indians 7th. Santana was obviously a force out at 2nd both before Cozart adjusted the position of the ball in his glove and after. Atrocious call! Its the same ump that wouldn't call any strikes until the Reds' 9th on Monday when they needed one to tie, then he called ones he hadn't been calling all night, plus some that were out of the zone!
Jun 20, 2012 9:13pm
wildcats20's avatar

wildcats20

In ROY I Trust!!

27,794 posts
Jun 20, 2012 9:16 PM
Footwedge;1206681 wrote:Unfortunately the error will stand. But in my view, the ss should get the errorr, not Votto. Come on, the throw was not that bad.

It's too bad that a play like that can't be reviewed. But in baseball, you can't really review something like that because there are no dead balls like other sports.
False.

Timeout was called right after the play. That is a dead ball. They do it for home runs. They could do it for much, much more.

That is an embarrassment to the umpiring profession.
Jun 20, 2012 9:16pm
M

mhs95_06

Senior Member

8,167 posts
Jun 20, 2012 9:16 PM
wildcats20;1206667 wrote:I was just thinking that...

There is NO WAY you can give a player an error when it was clearly a **** call.
Just like you shouldn't be able to collar a hitter with a K and 0/1 on a called strike 3 that is obviously 10" outside!
Jun 20, 2012 9:16pm
F

Footwedge

Senior Member

9,265 posts
Jun 20, 2012 9:16 PM
BRF;1206676 wrote:In the old days, you had to say that before the next pitch. Not sure how that works these days.
Playing a games under protest can't be filed on a judgement call...no matter how bad the judgement. Misinterpretation of the rules was grounds for a protest.

In any event, there's no doubt that the tribe is much better than the Peglegs. Last weekend was GOAT freak of nature in the annals of baseball.:D
Jun 20, 2012 9:16pm
F

Footwedge

Senior Member

9,265 posts
Jun 20, 2012 9:20 PM
wildcats20;1206686 wrote:False.

Timeout was called right after the play. That is a dead ball. They do it for home runs. They could do it for much, much more.

That is an embarrassment to the umpiring profession.
It's not false. No whistle blew. What if a runner was on second and tried to score on that play? The throw to the plate is late and a merry go round ensues?

You do not understand the point I'm trying to make.
Jun 20, 2012 9:20pm
Midstate01's avatar

Midstate01

Senior Member

14,766 posts
Jun 20, 2012 9:20 PM
Footwedge;1206690 wrote:Playing a games under protest can't be filed on a judgement call...no matter how bad the judgement. Misinterpretation of the rules was grounds for a protest.

In any event, there's no doubt that the tribe is much better than the Peglegs. Last weekend was GOAT freak of nature in the annals of baseball.:D

It's 35-30 right now.. Score wise for the 2 series.
Jun 20, 2012 9:20pm
M

mhs95_06

Senior Member

8,167 posts
Jun 20, 2012 9:21 PM
Footwedge;1206681 wrote:Unfortunately the error will stand. But in my view, the ss should get the errorr, not Votto. Come on, the throw was not that bad.

It's too bad that a play like that can't be reviewed. But in baseball, you can't really review something like that because there are no dead balls like other sports.
A throw in the dirt, or a pitch in the dirt always goes against the thrower, but yet fielders of bouncing balls regularly get errors on hit balls in the dirt that are more difficult than a lot of the throws in the dirt that go against the thrower!
Jun 20, 2012 9:21pm
wildcats20's avatar

wildcats20

In ROY I Trust!!

27,794 posts
Jun 20, 2012 9:21 PM
Footwedge;1206692 wrote:It's not false. No whistle blew. What if a runner was on second and tried to score on that play? The throw to the plate is late and a merry go round ensues?

You do not understand the point I'm trying to make.
TIME OUT WAS CALLED AKA DEAD BALL.
Jun 20, 2012 9:21pm
Midstate01's avatar

Midstate01

Senior Member

14,766 posts
Jun 20, 2012 9:21 PM
36-30
Jun 20, 2012 9:21pm
Midstate01's avatar

Midstate01

Senior Member

14,766 posts
Jun 20, 2012 9:22 PM
wildcats20;1206696 wrote:TIME OUT WAS CALLED AKA DEAD BALL.

Time was called. Baker came out. Thus a time out had to have been issued.
Jun 20, 2012 9:22pm
wildcats20's avatar

wildcats20

In ROY I Trust!!

27,794 posts
Jun 20, 2012 9:23 PM
Midstate01;1206699 wrote:Time was called. Baker came out. Thus a time out had to have been issued.
Exactly.

But no, there are no dead balls in baseball :rolleyes:
Jun 20, 2012 9:23pm
hoops23's avatar

hoops23

Senior Member

15,696 posts
Jun 20, 2012 9:25 PM
They should have changed the shot clock back to 5 seconds
Jun 20, 2012 9:25pm
Midstate01's avatar

Midstate01

Senior Member

14,766 posts
Jun 20, 2012 9:26 PM
hoops23;1206702 wrote:They should have changed the shot clock back to 5 seconds

Truf
Jun 20, 2012 9:26pm