Raw Dawgin' it;1183660 wrote:Oh good one with the reps...i haven't heard that befo....oh wait nevermind, you've only said that in response to all my posts since i was banned.

Reps.

Oh my bad, lol lol lol.

Raw Dawgin' it;1183662 wrote:go die and help our economy.

Reps.....oh wait. lol lol lol

ohioans are now able to exercise their right to casino gamble, hopefully in the near future sports gambling will be added.

isadore;1183696 wrote:ohioans are now able to exercise their right to casino gamble

You already said that

LJ;1183703 wrote:You already said that

you will notice from the complete statement I want to expand the right to gamble.

isadore;1183710 wrote:you will notice from the complete statement I want to expand the right to gamble.

Since when do you care about anyone's rights? This is a first.

you are wrong as usual

isadore;1184297 wrote:you are wrong as usual

dwccrew;1184287 wrote:Since when do you care about anyone's rights? This is a first.

He cares about the rights he likes

LJ;1184300 wrote:He cares about the rights he likes

He only cares about the rights of the poor and stupid.

dwccrew;1184307 wrote:He only cares about the rights of the poor and stupid.

that is very unappreciative of my efforts to win your rights.

LJ;1184300 wrote:He cares about the rights he likes

been opposing the right of terrorists to kill Americans, the right of the rich to oppress the poor and the right of pitt bulls to eat people.

isadore;1184319 wrote: the right of the rich to oppress the poor

Change "rich" to "politicians" and you will be correct

isadore;1184316 wrote:that is very unappreciative of my efforts to win your rights.

I don't need your help in preserving my rights. You have done nothing in your life to ever help protect my rights. If anything, you have most likely helped put people in power that have tried to limit or takeaway my rights. So thanks, but no thanks; I don't want/need your help.

dwccrew;1184330 wrote:Change "rich" to "politicians" and you will be correct

the rich have been waging class war against the poor.

isadore;1184337 wrote:the rich have been waging class war against the poor.

LOL, ok. Rallying cry of the oppressive powers that pray on weak minded poor people for votes. I feel bad for you that you don't have the mental capacity to understand that.

dwccrew;1184333 wrote:I don't need your help in preserving my rights. You have done nothing in your life to ever help protect my rights. If anything, you have most likely helped put people in power that have tried to limit or takeaway my rights. So thanks, but no thanks; I don't want/need your help.

Even by your own words you credit me with fighting specifically for your rights.

dwccrew wrote:He only cares about the rights of the poor and stupid.

Hopefully over your normal slow learning curve you will come to appreciate all my efforts for the betterment of America, but even you have come to appreciate my efforts on your part.

dwccrew;1184339 wrote:LOL, ok. Rallying cry of the oppressive powers that pray on weak minded poor people for votes. I feel bad for you that you don't have the mental capacity to understand that.

As you have already admitted

dwccrew wrote:He only cares about the rights of the poor and stupid.

I do fight for your rights. And as you have already shown measuring mental capacity of superior intellects is not one of your skills.

isadore;1184319 wrote:been opposing the right of terrorists to kill Americans, the right of the rich to oppress the poor and the right of pitt bulls to eat people.

Do you also oppose the rights of the Americans to be free from unlawful infringement against their privacy when it comes to their own person or belongings?

What about the rights of the successful entrepreneurs or business owners to reap the fruits of their own honest success?

Or the right of every dog to be treated equally?

Just playing Devil's Advocate.

isadore;1184337 wrote:the rich have been waging class war against the poor.

Inaccurate, if only because of the brush stroke you're using. There are a particular group of wealthy ... corporatists ... who use the government to further line their pockets in exchange for supporting political figures ... and not just the poor, but the middle-class as well, is left footing the bill.

I actually agree with the premise. You're just painting with a brush too broad.

isadore;1184337 wrote:the rich have been waging class war against the poor.

yet you are supporting the rich casino owners

Al Bundy;1184415 wrote:yet you are supporting the rich casino owners

i support the right, not the provider.

O-Trap;1184395 wrote:Do you also oppose the rights of the Americans to be free from unlawful infringement against their privacy when it comes to their own person or belongings?

What about the rights of the successful entrepreneurs or business owners to reap the fruits of their own honest success?

Or the right of every dog to be treated equally?

Just playing Devil's Advocate.



Inaccurate, if only because of the brush stroke you're using. There are a particular group of wealthy ... corporatists ... who use the government to further line their pockets in exchange for supporting political figures ... and not just the poor, but the middle-class as well, is left footing the bill.

I actually agree with the premise. You're just painting with a brush too broad.

Americans have a right to be protected from terrorist attack. We have a system of judicial review to determine if government actions are “unlawful infringement against privacy.”
Animals do not have rights, we use them based on their functionality to us. We exterminate rats, we raise then eat cattle, we keep some species at pets. Even among peoples the view of a species vary, Muslims consider dogs ritually impure, South Koreas eat dogs. Species do have histories. Rattlesnakes and Pitt Bulls have histories that show it is dangerous to have them around humans.
You are correct to point out the role of corporationists in using the government to oppress the poor and middle class. This is particularly true in their effort to undermine government regulations that protect the other classes. But there is a more general effort by the rich to undermine our once progressive taxing system.
Thank you for your informed input.

isadore;1184458 wrote:i support the right, not the provider.

If rich people such as Gilbert were not willing to invest their money and take financial risk, there would be no casino. If something goes wrong with the casino, it is Gilbert who has the risk of losing millions of dollars.

A judge threw out the lawsuit that the Ohio Roundtable filed trying to block the casinos/racinos, saying they had no legal standing.

So, there are now no hurdles in the way of Scioto Downs opening this week, barring appeal.

Also, The Ohio Roundtable can go fuck themselves.

Al Bundy;1184590 wrote:If rich people such as Gilbert were not willing to invest their money and take financial risk, there would be no casino. If something goes wrong with the casino, it is Gilbert who has the risk of losing millions of dollars.

the system has provided infinite ways for him to hide his profits from taxing and to write off his losses.