Pick6;1171909 wrote:thread got moved for calling somebody out who is clearly lying? LOL

In the past the name calling would have been unapproved and the posters would have been infracted. That is how it has been handled for over 2 years now. Nothing has changed. If they want, I can move the thread back and just give them infractions and unapprove their posts.

These rules have not changed
These rules apply to the Politics forum:

1. No personal attacks (including name calling) on other posters.
2. If you are starting a topic about a news item you must include the link, as well as your own opinion on the issue at hand.
3. If you make a claim that a study supports your view, you must link to the study.
4. Please do not make vague 1 line threads. They not be approved and/or deleted.

I didn't even know this was started in the politics forum.

LJ;1171940 wrote:In the past the name calling would have been unapproved and the posters would have been infracted. That is how it has been handled for over 2 years now. Nothing has changed. If they want, I can move the thread back and just give them infractions and unapprove their posts.

These rules have not changed
These rules apply to the Politics forum:

1. No personal attacks (including name calling) on other posters.
2. If you are starting a topic about a news item you must include the link, as well as your own opinion on the issue at hand.
3. If you make a claim that a study supports your view, you must link to the study.
4. Please do not make vague 1 line threads. They not be approved and/or deleted.

Ah, wasnt aware this was started in the politics forum. Rule #2 is broke as well. No link

Exception to the rule should be... Unless poster is lying and or trolling thread

Or you could just have moderators use discretion on posts rather than being black and white. That would require skilled moderators, and this forum has ZERO skilled moderators.

sleeper;1171972 wrote:Or you could just have moderators use discretion on posts rather than being black and white. That would require skilled moderators, and this forum has ZERO skilled moderators.

gut;1171327 wrote:Anyway, let's commence taxing the poor!

Wait, what? What tax? Where?

tax (tæks)
— n
1.	a compulsory financial contribution imposed by a government to raise revenue, levied on the income or property of persons or organizations, on the production costs or sales prices of goods and services, etc[/quote]

Naturally, the highlighting was mine.

The day gambling becomes mandatory will be the day it becomes a tax on anybody. Until then, it's a recreational activity engaged through personal choice which costs money.

believer;1171370 wrote:Legalized gambling is a sign that Ohio's progressing? :rolleyes:

Eh, I'd say allowing adults of sound mind the option to gamble is. Ohio doesn't need to be a nanny-state, I don't think.

Glory Days;1171879 wrote:....yeah, those states are AWESOME! :rolleyes:

In this particular regard, I'd say they have it correct. Allowing adults to choose whether or not to gamble is fine. I'm not even sure why there should have been a big fuss over it. It's an entertainment business, like any other.

sleeper;1171972 wrote:Or you could just have moderators use discretion on posts rather than being black and white. That would require skilled moderators, and this forum has ZERO skilled moderators.

Truth.

In all seriousness, sleeper, you know people would throw tantrums if Moderators were permitted to use subjective discretion that didn't exist in any rules. "I got banned for something that wasn't even against the rules! WTF? They should make clear-cut rules so these power-hungry mods can't just start passing out infractions because they had a bad day!"

Something along those lines. Maybe not you, but more than one somebody would be saying something similar.

I have missed o-traps excessively long and multi-quoted(while still filled with solid opinions and well written, sir) posts.


Edit: looks like you've merely been hanging out in the beer snob thread and the republican party thread. Indeed.

pnhasbeen;1174867 wrote:I have missed o-traps excessively long and multi-quoted(while still filled with solid opinions and well written, sir) posts.


Edit: looks like you've merely been hanging out in the beer snob thread and the republican party thread. Indeed.

I've been a lazy browser lately. When I come here, I go straight to my control panel, see if any topics I've already posted on have been posted on since, and I never really go outside those topics.

Well, tonight I got adventurous.

O-Trap;1174873 wrote:I've been a lazy browser lately. When I come here, I go straight to my control panel, see if any topics I've already posted on have been posted on since, and I never really go outside those topics.

Well, tonight I got adventurous.

I like when you're adventurous...but that was a tl;dr for now. Too much wine tonight. I'll check it when I sober up as it's probably epic. Celebrating keeping my job today. But tomorrow may be another round of cuts. Buy outs suck.

Honestly I've missed your input too lately. Don't be a stranger.

O-Trap;1174866 wrote:Wait, what? What tax? Where?

Naturally, the highlighting was mine.

The day gambling becomes mandatory will be the day it becomes a tax on anybody. Until then, it's a recreational activity engaged through personal choice which costs money.



Eh, I'd say allowing adults of sound mind the option to gamble is. Ohio doesn't need to be a nanny-state, I don't think.



In this particular regard, I'd say they have it correct. Allowing adults to choose whether or not to gamble is fine. I'm not even sure why there should have been a big fuss over it. It's an entertainment business, like any other.



Truth.

In all seriousness, sleeper, you know people would throw tantrums if Moderators were permitted to use subjective discretion that didn't exist in any rules. "I got banned for something that wasn't even against the rules! WTF? They should make clear-cut rules so these power-hungry mods can't just start passing out infractions because they had a bad day!"

Something along those lines. Maybe not you, but more than one somebody would be saying something similar.

There is where the problem is, too many Adults not of sound mind are gambling and throwing their families money away.

Skyhook79;1174909 wrote:There is where the problem is, too many Adults not of sound mind are gambling and throwing their families money away.

Why punish everyone for the faults of a few?

Skyhook79;1174909 wrote:There is where the problem is, too many Adults not of sound mind are gambling and throwing their families money away.

They were going to every state bordering Ohio to do it anyway. Might as well keep their money here because they're going to gamble regardless.

Might as well lump drinking alcohol, smoking tobacco, chewing tobacco, prescription meds, strip clubs, horse and dog tracks, did I miss anything else? People with addicition problems will find something that scratches that itch! As for mods, this place is starting to take on an eery resemblance to another unnamed place I wont name or say! lol

Skyhook79;1174909 wrote:There is where the problem is, too many Adults not of sound mind are gambling and throwing their families money away.

I agree 100% with this. The good news is, YOU currently have a job. So, since you won in life's lottery, we'll let you keep some of the government's money, and then give it to those whom you stole it from.

Thanks for playing!

It's worth noting that I agree with bases_loaded as well. I say erect a casino if you want... but only if I'm not forced to pay for those who have lost everything by engaging in such activities.

EDIT: Also, I wish we could make a GIANT banner of all the promised tax revenue - and where it would go - and hang it on the front of said casino. Then, in 5 or 10 years, we'll revisit the books thanks to the constant reminder.

cruiser_96;1174956 wrote:I agree 100% with this. The good news is, YOU currently have a job. So, since you won in life's lottery, we'll let you keep some of the government's money, and then give it to those whom you stole it from.

Thanks for playing!

It's worth noting that I agree with bases_loaded as well. I say erect a casino if you want... but only if I'm not forced to pay for those who have lost everything by engaging in such activities.

Well luckily most state services are based off of income not the amount of $ in your bank account.

Truth.

In all seriousness, sleeper, you know people would throw tantrums if Moderators were permitted to use subjective discretion that didn't exist in any rules. "I got banned for something that wasn't even against the rules! WTF? They should make clear-cut rules so these power-hungry mods can't just start passing out infractions because they had a bad day!"

Something along those lines. Maybe not you, but more than one somebody would be saying something similar.

Well if we had competent mods that people respected this wouldn't be a problem on the aggregate. I get 3-4 PMs a day telling me how terrible the mods are here and I'm just an average user; I can only imagine how many PMs Justin gets per day complaining about the moderators.

Post a few for us

Skyhook79;1174909 wrote:There is where the problem is, too many Adults not of sound mind are gambling and throwing their families money away.

I agree that that is a problem, much like those of the same cloth do with alcohol or the lottery.

Still, it isn't the place of the government to protect people from themselves, as if they somehow know better how to run your life than you do.

redstreak one;1174952 wrote:Might as well lump drinking alcohol, smoking tobacco, chewing tobacco, prescription meds, strip clubs, horse and dog tracks, did I miss anything else? People with addicition problems will find something that scratches that itch! As for mods, this place is starting to take on an eery resemblance to another unnamed place I wont name or say! lol

Former part, I agree. You get it.

Latter part ... eh, I'm not going to get into that discussion.

cruiser_96;1174956 wrote:I agree 100% with this. The good news is, YOU currently have a job. So, since you won in life's lottery, we'll let you keep some of the government's money, and then give it to those whom you stole it from.

Thanks for playing!

It's worth noting that I agree with bases_loaded as well. I say erect a casino if you want... but only if I'm not forced to pay for those who have lost everything by engaging in such activities.

EDIT: Also, I wish we could make a GIANT banner of all the promised tax revenue - and where it would go - and hang it on the front of said casino. Then, in 5 or 10 years, we'll revisit the books thanks to the constant reminder.

I agree as well that it is unjust to force those who have and get to pay for those who have not. I believe it is an ethical requirement upon discernment, but I don't want someone else determining my ethical requirements when no victim is involved.

The problem, then, is the social economic redistribution through force ... not gambling.

sleeper;1175008 wrote:Well if we had competent mods that people respected this wouldn't be a problem on the aggregate. I get 3-4 PMs a day telling me how terrible the mods are here and I'm just an average user; I can only imagine how many PMs Justin gets per day complaining about the moderators.

Fair enough.

lol at "conservatives" wanting the government to tell people how they can spend their money.

2kool4skool;1175617 wrote:lol at "conservatives" wanting the government to tell people how they can spend their money.

I read through this thread a bit... I didn't see where an example of your comment occurred.

2kool4skool;1175617 wrote:lol at "conservatives" wanting the government to tell people how they can spend their money.

lol at you trying to move the discussion away from your dumbassery

2kool4skool;1175617 wrote:lol at "conservatives" wanting the government to tell people how they can spend their money.

http://www.ohiochatter.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?12-Politics

I was playing blackjack with my uncle at the Hoover dam and the dealer started cheating for my uncle. I was betting only 25$ a hand and my uncle was betting 200$. He would tip 20 bucks every time he won (he was already up 5k on the trip). The dealer started Not even giving my uncle a chance to choose to hit or stay instead just turning the card up and placing it in the more favorable position for him. I've seen my uncle in a lot of situations but this was the most nervous I have ever seen him. He got up about 3k and walked away tipping the dealer another couple hundred and telling me to meet him at the car quickly.

Ive also been with my uncle at wheeling downs when he cashed 5000 in for chips at the table and they found a counterfeit 20$ in the money and they took his ass to security and questioned him for an hour or so over one fake 20 outta 5k. He runs a few bars and probably got the counterfeit bill from there.