sleeper;1166840 wrote:Someone is mad that they are going to be voted "The Worst" by a community of peers...

I really don't care.

sleeper;1166842 wrote:Larry Johnson?

I don't hate gays

LJ;1166845 wrote:I don't hate gays

Lumboko J'arka?

LJ;1166844 wrote:I really don't care.

Nice dodge.

sleeper;1166848 wrote:Lumboko J'arka?

Close

sleeper;1166850 wrote:Nice dodge.

How is it a dodge when truly, 0 fucks are given?

LJ;1166853 wrote:Close



How is it a dodge when truly, 0 fucks are given?

Zero fucks, but how many shits?

sleeper;1166857 wrote:Zero fucks, but how many shits?

-2

LJ;1166860 wrote:-2

-2 + x, 2.1 < x < &#8734;

LJ;1166837 wrote: are you a creepy ass who has a weird obessesion with me?

I'm gonna go with the latter.

Or is it creepy obsession with a weird ass?

LJ;1166860 wrote:-2

Somebody is backed up.

another pit bull doing what comes natural, killing babies
http://www.limaohio.com/articles/dog-83628-toledo-says.html

i guess that pit bull did not know that it was no longer considered by the state of Ohio to be a vicious dog.

isadore;1175710 wrote:another pit bull doing what comes natural, killing babies
http://www.limaohio.com/articles/dog-83628-toledo-says.html

i guess that pit bull did not know that it was no longer considered by the state of Ohio to be a vicious dog.

You're an idiot....that is all.

BR1986FB;1175739 wrote:You're an idiot....that is all.

thanks for your input, now we can read what you have to offer which is a prize winnning example of the intellectually pathetic.

isadore;1175750 wrote:thanks for your input, now we can read what you have to offer which is a prize winnning example of the intellectually pathetic.

gosh a ruddie, BR is right. You are lumping pitbulls into one or two isolated incidents. Someone as smart as you knows how dumb, illogical that is:rolleyes:

hardly, it is so easy to find examples the dogs are kid killers
pitts are so good at it
Baby killed by pit bull in grandparents' home
Monday, January 16, 2012
http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/story?section=news/local&id=8505754
Pit Bull Quarantined After Baby Killed
http://www.click2houston.com/news/Pit-Bull-Quarantined-After-Baby-Killed/-/1735978/2831334/-/qfxx8w/-/index.html
Sleeping Michigan baby killed by pit bull
http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2011/02/21/Sleeping-Michigan-baby-killed-by-pit-bull/UPI-36591298326504/
Atlanta police say the dog climbed into the baby's crib and bit her on the head.
abcnews.go.com/.../day-baby-killed-family-pit-bull-99...Feb 25, 2010

they are far ahead of another type of dog in killing people

they are number one in killing
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fatal_dog_attacks_in_the_United_States

Yes, and that goes back to the point that the pitbulls themselves aren't the killers. It's the owners that train them to be that way(drug dealers, gangsters, michael vicks, etc.)

DeyDurkie5;1175759 wrote:Yes, and that goes back to the point that the pitbulls themselves aren't the killers. It's the owners that train them to be that way(drug dealers, gangsters, michael vicks, etc.)

this is the cover story thats put out there, but if you read through many of these accounts, it is often family dogs with supposedly no history of violence. its like owning a rattlesnake.

isadore;1175760 wrote:this is the cover story thats put out there, but if you read through many of these accounts, it is often family dogs with supposedly no history of violence. its like owning a rattlesnake.

maybe a few of the attacks are that. Once again, you are lumping isolated instances and calling them the whole.

DeyDurkie5;1175761 wrote:maybe a few of the attacks are that. Once again, you are lumping isolated instances and calling them the whole.

these incidents listed above, the one in near lima and at least two of the three others all talking about a family dog.
the other just describes the dog as a one year old. This not some great sophisticated search. The first was from the morning paper and the others were the first three hits off google search pit bulls kill baby-
if something else had that kind of record of baby killing we would not let it in our home.

Isadore, would you like to have the government control what kind of dogs people can have?

Ohio would have been much better off with a law restricting exotic animals, if there had been we could have avoided the recent catastrophe near Zanesville. A law outlawing ownership of imported reptiles could have prevented south Florida from being overrun by Burmese pythons. States have a variety of restrictions on animal ownership. You have a certain type of dog that far exceeds any other breed in killing people especially children, then a restriction should definitely be considered.

LJ;1166344 wrote:You never leave ANY dog unattended with a baby within reach. Dogs think they are play toys, no matter the breed. Read the link I posted above.

isadore;1166371 wrote:dead babies trump killer dogs every time

LJ;1166372 wrote:Only the dogs that have killed are killer dogs.

Using that logic, all humans are killers. Nice one.

I quoted a few people to say this. My wife was brutally attacked by a CAT when she was about 4 months old. She was left in a bassinet or something at a friend's house, while the adults were in the next room drinking coffee. The cat jumped up and went to town on her. Her dad walked in and threw the cat against the wall, killing it instantly. She has some scarring on her forehead and had to get blood transfusions to stay alive; she literally almost died.

So, I guess we need to ban domestic cats as well, because they can kill babies too. And just fyi, she's not some scarred up monster.

isadore;1175825 wrote:Ohio would have been much better off with a law restricting exotic animals, if there had been we could have avoided the recent catastrophe near Zanesville. A law outlawing ownership of imported reptiles could have prevented south Florida from being overrun by Burmese pythons. States have a variety of restrictions on animal ownership. You have a certain type of dog that far exceeds any other breed in killing people especially children, then a restriction should definitely be considered.

Ohio would have been much better off? There was one situation where a guy let his animals out and then killed himself(if i remember correctly). I don't think that outlier should be so strongly considered. I don't know anything about the Florida situation, but I've been to Florida every year for the last 4 and then a couple years before that. Haven't seen anything that made me think "overrun by pythons." I wonder what Fab's opinion on this would be.

It should be considered and then it should be immediately turned down as it oversteps its bounds. If I want to own a pitbull, I have that right. And it shouldn't be taken away. If I choose to run the risk of letting it hurt my babies, I take that risk. Of course, I probably won't treat it to be aggressive so I wouldn't have that problem.

bigkahuna;1175860 wrote:I quoted a few people to say this. My wife was brutally attacked by a CAT when she was about 4 months old. She was left in a bassinet or something at a friend's house, while the adults were in the next room drinking coffee. The cat jumped up and went to town on her. Her dad walked in and threw the cat against the wall, killing it instantly. She has some scarring on her forehead and had to get blood transfusions to stay alive; she literally almost died.

So, I guess we need to ban domestic cats as well, because they can kill babies too. And just fyi, she's not some scarred up monster.

Shit, why stop there. I don't think pets should be allowed at all. They are animals and have the ability to harm a baby. Shit, let's limit one baby per family because a child could seriously harm their sibling.