rmolin73;1161181 wrote:You truly are a piece of work. You are a small, small ignorant one.
And this make us better than them how?ksig489;1161138 wrote:At least the little one is now at peace and with the big ghost in the sky.
The parents should not be executed...yet. They should have to spend some time locked away with someone who treats them just the same...maybe an hourly beating with an extension cord followed up with some rubbing alcohol over the wounds. After 6 years of this, then they can be executed with a ball bat to the head until they cant get up.
You're equally as ignorant for chiming in yourself.dlazz;1161206 wrote:You're ignorant for constantly biting at his trolling.
And the story is sad, but it doesn't matter what is said or done...stories like this will continue to happen.
I find that it's best to ignore them.
There's nothing wrong with pointing out a troll.rmolin73;1161221 wrote:You're equally as ignorant for chiming in yourself.
Sadly, this is true. It's amazing some of the child abuse goes on that you don't even hear about. My wife works for a company that finds home for sexually and physically abused children, and some of the stories she tells me about some of the kids are just insane. The fact that you don't even hear about 3/4 of them just boggles my mind. I know of one case, right here in Stark County, that is much worse than this, and nothing was mentioned about it in the media. The parents got off with just a slap on the wrist. IMO, had it became a major story, the judge wouldn't have been so quick to let them off so lightly.Fly4Fun;1160981 wrote: It's absolutely terrible, but this isn't a unique situation.
Trolling rule #2.5B, bylaw IX: The labeling of a troll, on a trolling thread shall be acceptable as in any case from heretofore. All labellings shall be brief, to the point, and no other idle chatter may accompany said labelling.FatHobbit;1161236 wrote:There's nothing wrong with pointing out a troll.
Not according to d'ass the sleeper protege.FatHobbit;1161236 wrote:There's nothing wrong with pointing out a troll.
Why would you be worried about being a better person? You clearly aren't worried about it based on the way you post on this site.sleeper;1161207 wrote:And this make us better than them how?
And I like yours. This is classic.cruiser_96;1161243 wrote:Trolling rule #2.5B, bylaw IX: The labeling of a troll, on a trolling thread shall be acceptable as in any case from heretofore. All labellings shall be brief, to the point, and no other idle chatter may accompany said labelling.
The rule is pretty cut and dry. FatHobbit is within compliance.
An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.ksig489;1161253 wrote:Why would you be worried about being a better person? You clearly aren't worried about it based on the way you post on this site.
Besides...I would not be the one doing anything to them, I have no control over what happens in a prison, and quite frankly...I believe in the concept of an eye for an eye. Hammurabi had it right.
It's not "eyes for eyes", it's an "eye for an eye", and we only need one eye to see...just sayin'sleeper;1161256 wrote:An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.
Erroneous.vball10set;1161259 wrote:It's not "eyes for eyes", it's an "eye for an eye", and we only need one eye to see...just sayin'
Useless without pictures.sleeper;1161265 wrote:Erroneous.
Cyclops did it!sleeper;1161265 wrote:Erroneous.
