Gblock;1130770 wrote:circus or not i see a blowout win for obama...

Impossible; he has lost votes from every demographic: independents, Catholics, etc...etc...

The experiment is over; voters know we need an adult like Mitt Romney in there to clean up the mess.

I don't want The POTUS to have "swag".

I want them to want a society of hard working achievers.

bases_loaded;1130866 wrote:I don't want The POTUS to have "swag".

I want them to want a society of hard working achievers.

when dealing w/ n korea , china, afghan, iraq, yes you do need some swag

Gblock;1130881 wrote:when dealing w/ n korea , china, afghan, iraq, yes you do need some swag

North Korea thinks were pussies, China owns us, he cares more about Afghanistan soldiers than ours, and he did nothing but quit on Iraq.

Take off your brown colored glasses.

bases_loaded;1130896 wrote:North Korea thinks were pussies, China owns us, he cares more about Afghanistan soldiers than ours, and he did nothing but quit on Iraq.

Take off your brown colored glasses.

lol wut? i never said i supported obama...try some reading comprehension. i just said the GOP candidates were pretty much a joke. downing obama doesnt change that. again i ll repeat it for you i didnt vote for obama.

Gblock;1130906 wrote:lol wut? i never said i supported obama...try some reading comprehension. i just said the GOP candidates were pretty much a joke. downing obama doesnt change that. again i ll repeat it for you i didnt vote for obama.

Welcome to the OC political mindset. You're black, thus love Obama.

ts1227;1130910 wrote:Welcome to the OC political mindset. You're black, thus love Obama.

Yes, but for every 1 gblock there may be 4 black people who vote for Obama in November just because he is black.

bigdaddy2003;1130916 wrote:Yes, but for every 1 gblock there may be 4 black people who vote for Obama in November just because he is black.

and 10 white people who wont vote for him just because hes black...whats the point?

As I'm sure that there will be many Romney voters who choose him because he isn't black. It works both ways. Until 2008 a candidate's race wasn't much of an issue. Unfortunately, that isn't true anymore.

Gblock;1130906 wrote:lol wut? i never said i supported obama...try some reading comprehension. i just said the GOP candidates were pretty much a joke. downing obama doesnt change that. again i ll repeat it for you i didnt vote for obama.

Who did you vote for and why in 2008

So much for the concept of a secret ballot.

bases_loaded;1130925 wrote:Who did you vote for and why in 2008

as i stated i dont have faith in our current system. i feel like big business and those who lobby for them have corrupted things. politicians are all crooks imo. furthermore even if a person with solid convictions who i beleived in were in power, rarely do they have the abilty to create anychange because of said corruption or lack of control of the house/senate. so i didnt vote and dont plan to vote this time. for this reason i also dont bitch about what happens. i was just making an observation that the GOP candidates are very lukewarm to me and not very inspiring. if you vote for them it would be because you agree with their policy more than their leadership if that makes sense??

stlouiedipalma;1130935 wrote:So much for the concept of a secret ballot.

Just prepping for his next term homes, swagalicious

Gblock;1130921 wrote:and 10 white people who wont vote for him just because hes black...whats the point?

stlouiedipalma;1130922 wrote:As I'm sure that there will be many Romney voters who choose him because he isn't black. It works both ways. Until 2008 a candidate's race wasn't much of an issue. Unfortunately, that isn't true anymore.

...and this is exactly why I wish Herman Cain had been a more viable candidate for the GOP.

That way, everyone would have to vote on the issues, rather than on the color of the candidates skin.

wkfan;1130956 wrote:...and this is exactly why I wish Herman Cain had been a more viable candidate for the GOP.

That way, everyone would have to vote on the issues, rather than on the color of the candidates skin.

Excellent point.

wkfan;1130956 wrote:...and this is exactly why I wish Herman Cain had been a more viable candidate for the GOP.

That way, everyone would have to vote on the issues, rather than on the color of the candidates skin.

He was a great candidate. The MSM destroyed him bc of it

bases_loaded;1130967 wrote:He was a great candidate. The MSM destroyed him bc of it

He was not. Cain destroyed himself.

Although he had good business experience (which the current POTUS did not and does not have), he had way too much baggage and lost alot of credibility and respect due to his sexual harrassment issues.

wkfan;1130976 he had way too much baggage and lost alot of credibility and respect due to his sexual harrassment issues.[/QUOTE wrote:
Bill Clinton.

Do you really think Cain took his candidacy seriously? I believe it was nothing more than a means to sell books.

stlouiedipalma;1130990 wrote:Do you really think Cain took his candidacy seriously? I believe it was nothing more than a means to sell books.

I believe he was very serious.

bases_loaded;1130983 wrote:Bill Clinton.

and yet, we elected him twice.

That said, he is 1,000,000,000,000 the POTUS that BHO is.

wkfan;1131025 wrote:and yet, we elected him twice.

The media didn't call for his damn head

bases_loaded;1131027 wrote:The media didn't call for his damn head

Doesn't that tell you something about the media??

Gblock;1130810 wrote:i really cant say much for or against obama i didnt vote last time and wont vote this time i really abhor politics and think all politicians are crooks. im just looking at it from an unbiased perspective and dont like the idea of how other countries would respect any of the gop candidates...i would have rated sarah palin above most of these and she has zero credentials. of the gop i guess gingrich has the most swag but he may have too much baggage.

I dislike politics and politicians as well, but I still vote and you should too. Do what I do, I just vote against the incumbent in every election. If people did this more often, instead of keeping people in for life, we would get politicians that actually work to achieve something for the greater good because they would know their seat isn't safe.