data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a06c/9a06c23a653bdd08f2dab6b12a25cc10255bb675" alt="KR1245's avatar"
KR1245
Posts: 4,317
Mar 11, 2012 5:31pm
Hell of a game
Bucks transition defense was awful today. They really need to get Willy going if they want to make some serious noise
Bucks transition defense was awful today. They really need to get Willy going if they want to make some serious noise
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Mar 11, 2012 5:32pm
Excellent game--B1G represent!!!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bbb54/bbb54853269f6036943d1f09954e1ab799acfbff" alt="Fly4Fun's avatar"
Fly4Fun
Posts: 7,730
Mar 11, 2012 5:32pm
It would be a shame of Sparty didn't get a 1 seed. The winner of this game for sure needed to be a 1 seed, and Sparty earned it.
I love the way OSU has been playing. This game doesn't worry me, a few dumb fouls by Craft might have been the difference.
I love the way OSU has been playing. This game doesn't worry me, a few dumb fouls by Craft might have been the difference.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55ad4/55ad40c91c6d3630bb732eae806eaee6e71fb1c5" alt="wes_mantooth's avatar"
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
Mar 11, 2012 5:32pm
Couple things...
MSU should be a #1 seed, but just as always...it may be better to be the first #2 seed.
OSU isn't a team capable of making a deep tourney run because they don't have the guard play. You have to be able to stretch the floor a little.
MSU should be a #1 seed, but just as always...it may be better to be the first #2 seed.
OSU isn't a team capable of making a deep tourney run because they don't have the guard play. You have to be able to stretch the floor a little.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/805c6/805c635f04f6feb57be120f47f5071504051c3a4" alt="ytownfootball's avatar"
ytownfootball
Posts: 6,978
Mar 11, 2012 5:33pm
Lol..they were fineLJ;1112618 wrote:OSU had no legs in the 2nd half.
Just bad shot selections chucking threes down late.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/279a9/279a9beece8a805c9ce152c8e21c36ed6b0b938b" alt="LJ's avatar"
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Mar 11, 2012 5:36pm
ytownfootball;1112630 wrote:Lol..they were fine
Just bad shot selections chucking threes down late.
It was obvious both teams were exhausted in the 2nd half. 66% and 50% free throw shooting is a huge indicator of that
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb2dd/eb2ddb24099d7f8ff52452d5fdeb88ff25dfb9ee" alt="Automatik's avatar"
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Mar 11, 2012 5:36pm
Great game, but OSU was flat out sloppy towards the end and MSU made the big shots. That 3 by Green was huge.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a06c/9a06c23a653bdd08f2dab6b12a25cc10255bb675" alt="KR1245's avatar"
KR1245
Posts: 4,317
Mar 11, 2012 5:36pm
wes_mantooth;1112628 wrote:Couple things...
MSU should be a #1 seed, but just as always...it may be better to be the first #2 seed.
OSU isn't a team capable of making a deep tourney run because they don't have the guard play. You have to be able to stretch the floor a little.
I dont know, I could still see this team making a run. If they play defense like they're capable of I think this team can beat anybody
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Mar 11, 2012 5:37pm
It was huge, but it was one of the few things he did today--Valpo Boy was the differenceAutomatik;1112640 wrote:Great game, but OSU was flat out sloppy towards the end and MSU made the big shots. That 3 by Green was huge.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/805c6/805c635f04f6feb57be120f47f5071504051c3a4" alt="ytownfootball's avatar"
ytownfootball
Posts: 6,978
Mar 11, 2012 5:38pm
They weren't more tired than Sparty, and they played the same in three days. I just hope you're not making that as an excuse, or being critical of bench play, because that's just not the case.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a06c/9a06c23a653bdd08f2dab6b12a25cc10255bb675" alt="KR1245's avatar"
KR1245
Posts: 4,317
Mar 11, 2012 5:39pm
haha. Like Russell Wilson all over againvball10set;1112644 wrote:It was huge, but it was one of the few things he did today--Valpo Boy was the difference
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bbb54/bbb54853269f6036943d1f09954e1ab799acfbff" alt="Fly4Fun's avatar"
Fly4Fun
Posts: 7,730
Mar 11, 2012 5:41pm
I completely disagree. I think OSU makes a good run. We have a very strong inside game and rebounding. Craft is going to give every opposing PG big trouble. And I still haven't completely abandoned the idea Bufford can make the difference. But his play will be the x-factor in a game versus a team with bigs who can match up with Sullinger/Thomas.wes_mantooth;1112628 wrote:Couple things...
MSU should be a #1 seed, but just as always...it may be better to be the first #2 seed.
OSU isn't a team capable of making a deep tourney run because they don't have the guard play. You have to be able to stretch the floor a little.
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Mar 11, 2012 5:42pm
exactly!!!KR1245;1112649 wrote:haha. Like Russell Wilson all over again
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/279a9/279a9beece8a805c9ce152c8e21c36ed6b0b938b" alt="LJ's avatar"
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Mar 11, 2012 5:45pm
ytownfootball;1112647 wrote:They weren't more tired than Sparty, and they played the same in three days. I just hope you're not making that as an excuse, or being critical of bench play, because that's just not the case.
I am saying both teams were exhausted and sloppy at times. Especially OSU at the end. Buford and Thomas played 114 and 110 minutes respectively over the past 3 days. They, as well as Sully, were obviously tired and playing sloppy.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55ad4/55ad40c91c6d3630bb732eae806eaee6e71fb1c5" alt="wes_mantooth's avatar"
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
Mar 11, 2012 5:49pm
Fly4Fun;1112652 wrote:I completely disagree. I think OSU makes a good run. We have a very strong inside game and rebounding. Craft is going to give every opposing PG big trouble. And I still haven't completely abandoned the idea Bufford can make the difference. But his play will be the x-factor in a game versus a team with bigs who can match up with Sullinger/Thomas.
I don't see it. This team doesn't seem like it has "it" factor
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bce86/bce863ad5bd6949a54b80d6ca3a9213fd6a43c44" alt="Midstate01's avatar"
Midstate01
Posts: 14,766
Mar 11, 2012 6:05pm
wes_mantooth;1112663 wrote:I don't see it. This team doesn't seem like it has "it" factor
Last years team did.. And didn't make it to the elite 8. You just never know
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55ad4/55ad40c91c6d3630bb732eae806eaee6e71fb1c5" alt="wes_mantooth's avatar"
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
Mar 11, 2012 6:06pm
Midstate01;1112692 wrote:Last years team did.. And didn't make it to the elite 8. You just never know
Truth. Still confused how we pissed that away. Matchups are everything
C
centralbucksfan
Posts: 5,111
Mar 11, 2012 6:36pm
Neither team was more tired than the other. Difference in game was at the 52-45 OSU lead. OSU was on a roll and let up, MSU ran off 10 straight in less than 2 min. Way to easy. OSU fell asleep on transition defense during that run.
I am not too unhappy over the loss. Over the past 3 days, OSU definately stepped up their play.
I am not too unhappy over the loss. Over the past 3 days, OSU definately stepped up their play.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/279a9/279a9beece8a805c9ce152c8e21c36ed6b0b938b" alt="LJ's avatar"
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Mar 11, 2012 6:39pm
Nobody claimed that, but thanks for the info.centralbucksfan;1112788 wrote:Neither team was more tired than the other.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/805c6/805c635f04f6feb57be120f47f5071504051c3a4" alt="ytownfootball's avatar"
ytownfootball
Posts: 6,978
Mar 11, 2012 6:43pm
I thought Thad should have called a TO during that run but he waited for the TV TO. Needed to change the momentum there and waited too long. Also needed to run the O and not chuck threes toward the end but yeah, I'm not overly let down by the L.centralbucksfan;1112788 wrote: Difference in game was at the 52-45 OSU lead. OSU was on a roll and let up, MSU ran off 10 straight in less than 2 min.
P
Prescott
Posts: 2,569
Mar 11, 2012 7:09pm
Game changing. Attention to detail cost OSU the game. Getting back on defense is a must against MSU.OSU fell asleep on transition defense during that run.