Gblock;1106625 wrote:did they lose a reciever?...seems like they already had a big logjam at wideout
Colston & Meachem are both hitting the market.Gblock;1106625 wrote:did they lose a reciever?...seems like they already had a big logjam at wideout
The people in Tennessee said he'd lost his "burst" three teams ago. When a receiver's main weapon is running in a straight line with speed is gone he's pretty much screwed.said_aouita;1106801 wrote:He's still fast but (imo) we've not seen that extra gear to gap DB's in years.
Nicks?ichsnjb;1106626 wrote:Well they have to decide whether to keep Colsten or Nicks. Correct me if I spell wrong.
In your opinion do you think he was ever motivated to show 100% of whatever burst he had left while in Tennessee?BR1986FB;1106806 wrote:The people in Tennessee said he'd lost his "burst" three teams ago. When a receiver's main weapon is running in a straight line with speed is gone he's pretty much screwed.
sportswizuhrd;1107317 wrote:Nicks?
sportswizuhrd;1107317 wrote:Nicks?
It's a hangover headache caused me to read that as Colston and Nicks were two WR's. I don't know the poster very well so I wasn't sure if he meant they had Hakeem Nicks, so when I read it, I thought wtf.pnhasbeen;1107436 wrote:He's a guard.
Was that a "who the fuck" question?
4.39 40 fast enough for you endurance boy?said_aouita;1106801 wrote:He's still fast but (imo) we've not seen that extra gear to gap DB's in years.
Thank goodness I don't have to cover RM.karen lotz;1107590 wrote:4.39 40 fast enough for you endurance boy?
