like_that;1301695 wrote:a*

SportsAndLady;1301696 wrote:I brought Weeden into the convo because you said flaccos game was the lowest rated since 08 which to me was hilarious because no way weedens game was better than flaccos. Then your butt ached when you responded with NEAT. Sorry I was making a random comment on something, it won't happen again Mr LJ sir.

LJ;1301699 wrote:My butt feels fine, thanks.

SportsAndLady;1301713 wrote:As long as you realize that posting NEAT in response to someone trying to have a conversation makes you come off as a giant dick, I can take from this convo you're not butthurt.

justincredible;1301715 wrote:Can we all agree that this conversation is going nowhere and change the subject before this thread gets even more polluted with bickering?

like_that;1301733 wrote:Sure.

What will be the worst record to get into the AFC playoffs. I think there is a good chance we see a 7-9 get in.

justincredible;1301786 wrote:Based on my calculations the top seed will be 11-5 and there will be some shitty teams squeak in. I see at least one 8-8 team and one will probably be a division winner (West). I think the Pats win the East at 9-7 or 10-6. And as shitty as the Jets are I think they have a decent shot at a wild card at 8-8 or 9-7.

justincredible;1301786 wrote:Based on my calculations the top seed will be 11-5 and there will be some shitty teams squeak in. I see at least one 8-8 team and one will probably be a division winner (West). I think the Pats win the East at 9-7 or 10-6. And as shitty as the Jets are I think they have a decent shot at a wild card at 8-8 or 9-7.

justincredible;1301786 wrote:Based on my calculations the top seed will be 11-5 and there will be some shitty teams squeak in. I see at least one 8-8 team and one will probably be a division winner (West). I think the Pats win the East at 9-7 or 10-6. And as shitty as the Jets are I think they have a decent shot at a wild card at 8-8 or 9-7.

Raw Dawgin' it;1301813 wrote:Last year the patriots were 5-3 after 8 and went to the super bowl. GTFO with 9-7

justincredible;1301824 wrote:Oh. Okay.

Raw Dawgin' it;1301830 wrote:Jets ever win the super bowl with sanchez and ryan I'd stop watching football.

gorocks99;1301810 wrote:Charles Woodson out 6 weeks w/ a broken collarbone: https://twitter.com/JayGlazer/status/260452763488624641

like_that;1301482 wrote:Yeah yeah, you are butt hurt, we get it.

Anyway, anyone hear about the charges cheating? http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/blog/nfl-rapidreports/20632545/chargers-accused-of-cheating-with-illegal-stickum

Ironman92;1302019 wrote:Why would anyone need to use stickem? Anyone who has ever put on those $50 receiver gloves knows stickem can't do anything those gloves don't.....you could palm a bowling ball with them.

like_that;1302028 wrote:Watch Greg Little play football, and there is the answer to your question.

Terry_Tate;1302981 wrote:For the stats nerds and those who have time to kill, I saw @ESPNStatsInfo tweet about an article comparing RG III and Andrew Luck. It uses the dreaded QBR but it's a good analysis comparing the differences between the 2 of them so far. Would be interesting to see the stats compared for all rookie QBs.

http://fifthdown.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/10/23/luck-vs-griffin-a-statistical-comparison/?ref=football

Terry_Tate;1302981 wrote:For the stats nerds and those who have time to kill, I saw @ESPNStatsInfo tweet about an article comparing RG III and Andrew Luck. It uses the dreaded QBR but it's a good analysis comparing the differences between the 2 of them so far. Would be interesting to see the stats compared for all rookie QBs.

http://fifthdown.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/10/23/luck-vs-griffin-a-statistical-comparison/?ref=football