like_that
Posts: 26,625
Oct 22, 2012 7:48am
+1SportsAndLady;1301388 wrote:I will let them know you get your feelings hurt when you have an opinion on the QBR.
God forbid anyone disagree with the all knowing LJ. I am with BR, QBR is a joke along with any other QB rating system. QBR is just ESPN's attempt to make an impact on the NFL.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Oct 22, 2012 7:55am
Didn't Dilfer invent the QBR?like_that;1301458 wrote:+1
God forbid anyone disagree with the all knowing LJ. I am with BR, QBR is a joke along with any other QB rating system. QBR is just ESPN's attempt to make an impact on the NFL.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Oct 22, 2012 7:57am
like_that;1301458 wrote:+1
God forbid anyone disagree with the all knowing LJ. I am with BR, QBR is a joke along with any other QB rating system. QBR is just ESPN's attempt to make an impact on the NFL.
God forbid I have an opinion on something right?
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Oct 22, 2012 8:06am
If he even put.000001% it's a joke.BR1986FB;1301462 wrote:Didn't Dilfer invent the QBR?
Yeah, because that's what I said...LJ;1301463 wrote:God forbid I have an opinion on something right?
Everyone has an opinion, otherwise the forum wouldn't exist. You seem to be one of the few here who think their opinion is the only correct opinion, and you def get your feelings hurt when people disagree.
Anyway, back on topic. Anyone else feel like the Texans should run away with the AFC title, but they will choke to some bullshit team that has no business being in the SB (patriots)?
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Oct 22, 2012 8:12am
like_that;1301470 wrote:If he even put.000001% it's a joke.
Yeah, because that's what I said...
Everyone has an opinion, otherwise the forum wouldn't exist. You seem to be one of the few here who think their opinion is the only correct opinion, and you def get your feelings hurt when people disagree.
Anyway, back on topic. Anyone else feel like the Texans should run away with the AFC title, but they will choke to some bullshit team that has no business being in the SB (patriots)?
My feelings have never been hurt on this forum. Excuse me for sticking to my opinions and not being a pushover.
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Oct 22, 2012 8:25am
Yeah yeah, you are butt hurt, we get it.LJ;1301474 wrote:My feelings have never been hurt on this forum. Excuse me for sticking to my opinions and not being a pushover.
Anyway, anyone hear about the charges cheating? http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/blog/nfl-rapidreports/20632545/chargers-accused-of-cheating-with-illegal-stickum
Raw Dawgin' it
Posts: 11,466
Oct 22, 2012 8:33am
I saw something on deadspin but didn't read the details. Did the guy use to work for New England?like_that;1301482 wrote:Yeah yeah, you are butt hurt, we get it.
Anyway, anyone hear about the charges cheating? http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/blog/nfl-rapidreports/20632545/chargers-accused-of-cheating-with-illegal-stickum
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Oct 22, 2012 8:38am
21/43, 147 yards, 1 TD, 2 INTs is worse than 12/35, 118 yards, 0 TD, 4 INTs
Yeah, okay
I don't need a stupid ranking system to tell me who had the worse game. Sure, it might tell you accurate rankings over the course of a set amount of games, so use it in that argument and not in an individual game argument.
Yeah, okay
I don't need a stupid ranking system to tell me who had the worse game. Sure, it might tell you accurate rankings over the course of a set amount of games, so use it in that argument and not in an individual game argument.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Oct 22, 2012 8:48am
Yeah, Weeden's game was definitely worse than Flacco's. If that QBR had a "minus" ranking I'm surprised Weeden's wasn't in that minus category in week 1.SportsAndLady;1301491 wrote:21/43, 147 yards, 1 TD, 2 INTs is worse than 12/35, 118 yards, 0 TD, 4 INTs
Yeah, okay
I don't need a stupid ranking system to tell me who had the worse game. Sure, it might tell you accurate rankings over the course of a set amount of games, so use it in that argument and not in an individual game argument.
Shit, Browns fans would've killed for Flacco's stats (by Weeden) in week 1. It probably would've meant a victory.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Oct 22, 2012 8:49am
It would have for sure meant a victory lol
I honestly cannot believe we couldn't pull that game out...one of the best defensive performances you could ask for
I honestly cannot believe we couldn't pull that game out...one of the best defensive performances you could ask for
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Oct 22, 2012 9:01am
Nah, they would've found a way to screw it up.SportsAndLady;1301505 wrote:It would have for sure meant a victory lol
I honestly cannot believe we couldn't pull that game out...one of the best defensive performances you could ask for
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Oct 22, 2012 9:46am
SportsAndLady;1301491 wrote:21/43, 147 yards, 1 TD, 2 INTs is worse than 12/35, 118 yards, 0 TD, 4 INTs
Yeah, okay
I don't need a stupid ranking system to tell me who had the worse game. Sure, it might tell you accurate rankings over the course of a set amount of games, so use it in that argument and not in an individual game argument.
Except that the difference of .3 vs 1.2 on a scale of 100 isn't the difference you are trying to make it out to be. I just thought the stat was funny seeing as how Flacco is quick to point out that he is"elite". I'm not sure why he has to be compared to Weeden since he has never anointed himself as "elite"
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Oct 22, 2012 12:57pm
To be fair, you don't need to throw for many yards when you rush for 252.Raw Dawgin' it;1301446 wrote:Patriots secondary is atrocious. They got lit up by Sanchez, the same Sanchez that couldn't even get 100 yards against the Colts.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Oct 22, 2012 1:29pm
LOL what the fuck? All im saying is they rate flaccos game higher than weedens when its clear Weeden had the worse game, I don't care how big of a difference it is its still pathetic.LJ;1301538 wrote:Except that the difference of .3 vs 1.2 on a scale of 100 isn't the difference you are trying to make it out to be. I just thought the stat was funny seeing as how Flacco is quick to point out that he is"elite". I'm not sure why he has to be compared to Weeden since he has never anointed himself as "elite"
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Oct 22, 2012 1:32pm
QBR was "invented" by Dilfer. He made it because he was QQing about his QB rating in the NFL and thought 4th qt was more important. Excuse me while I LMAO. Let me get this striahgt, your team is down, you threw a pick 6 in the second but lead the team from behind and score a TD in the 4th means you had a better day than a QB who threw no picks, yet no TD in the 4th? Guess what, you handle your business and don't throw pick 6's then you don't need to come from behind and throw a game winning TD, thus voiding the whole assine system. QBR is fucking dumb and so is Dilfer.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Oct 22, 2012 1:34pm
As soon as I hear Dilfer was behind this I knew it had limited to no validity.Commander of Awesome;1301676 wrote:QBR was "invented" by Dilfer. He made it because he was QQing about his QB rating in the NFL and thought 4th qt was more important. Excuse me while I LMAO. Let me get this striahgt, your team is down, you threw a pick 6 in the second but lead the team from behind and score a TD in the 4th means you had a better day than a QB who threw no picks, yet no TD in the 4th? Guess what, you handle your business and don't throw pick 6's then you don't need to come from behind and throw a game winning TD, thus voiding the whole assine system. QBR is fucking dumb and so is Dilfer.
gorocks99
Posts: 10,760
Oct 22, 2012 1:35pm
winner winner, chicken dinnerCommander of Awesome;1301676 wrote:QBR was "invented" by Dilfer. He made it because he was QQing about his QB rating in the NFL and thought 4th qt was more important. Excuse me while I LMAO. Let me get this striahgt, your team is down, you threw a pick 6 in the second but lead the team from behind and score a TD in the 4th means you had a better day than a QB who threw no picks, yet no TD in the 4th? Guess what, you handle your business and don't throw pick 6's then you don't need to come from behind and throw a game winning TD, thus voiding the whole assine system. QBR is fucking dumb and so is Dilfer.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Oct 22, 2012 1:36pm
Obviously LJ is behind it too since his butt got all hurt when I made a general comment towards it and he responds with "NEAT"
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Oct 22, 2012 1:37pm
LJ loses again. What's new?
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Oct 22, 2012 1:44pm
SportsAndLady;1301682 wrote:Obviously LJ is behind it too since his butt got all hurt when I made a general comment towards it and he responds with "NEAT"
Thanks for letting me know. I was unaware.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Oct 22, 2012 1:44pm
like_that;1301683 wrote:LJ loses again. What's new?
I lost what again? Lost in making fun of Flacco? Darn/
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Oct 22, 2012 1:47pm
You had to edit your post for that second gem of a question?LJ;1301686 wrote:I lost what again? Lost in making fun of Flacco? Darn/
LMAO.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Oct 22, 2012 1:48pm
SportsAndLady;1301672 wrote:LOL what the fuck? All im saying is they rate flaccos game higher than weedens when its clear Weeden had the worse game, I don't care how big of a difference it is its still pathetic.
The point of posting it had nothing to do with weeden. Who cares? Fact is they both suck, but one calls himself elite.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Oct 22, 2012 1:50pm
like_that;1301689 wrote:You had to edit your post for that second gem of a question?
LMAO.
No, my service is weak and keeps screwing up my posts. Is that your attempt at an witty response?
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Oct 22, 2012 1:52pm
a*LJ;1301693 wrote:No, my service is weak and keeps screwing up my posts. Is that your attempt at an witty response?