T
Tiernan
Posts: 13,021
Oct 21, 2012 7:51pm
...and then all the pigs fly out of all our asses.gerb131;1301102 wrote:Lucky ass Pats. They should have been beaten, I think if Hill makes that catch the Jets cash it in.
gerb131
Posts: 9,932
Oct 21, 2012 7:54pm
LOL but the Pats aren't the normal Pats this year they are hiding things just doing it better than the Steelers.Tiernan;1301109 wrote:...and then all the pigs fly out of all our asses.
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Oct 21, 2012 8:09pm
That Hill drop was absolutely brutal. I agree that the Jets probably win if he catches that. Oh well.gerb131;1301102 wrote:Lucky ass Pats. They should have been beaten, I think if Hill makes that catch the Jets cash it in.
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Oct 21, 2012 8:27pm
Now you know how it feels to have Greg Little on your team.justincredible;1301129 wrote:That Hill drop was absolutely brutal. I agree that the Jets probably win if he catches that. Oh well.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Oct 21, 2012 8:32pm
Ohio State Walk-On Nate Ebner was on the field during the Jets OT poessesion
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Oct 21, 2012 8:36pm
I DON'T LIKE IT.like_that;1301158 wrote:Now you know how it feels to have Greg Little on your team.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Oct 21, 2012 10:20pm
Adam Schefter ‏@AdamSchefter Joe Flacco’s Total QBR, a metric that accounts for everything a QB does, was 0.3 on the 0-100 scale, the lowest rating for any QB since 2008
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Oct 21, 2012 10:27pm
/Sanchez'dLJ;1301297 wrote:Adam Schefter ‏@AdamSchefter Joe Flacco’s Total QBR, a metric that accounts for everything a QB does, was 0.3 on the 0-100 scale, the lowest rating for any QB since 2008
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Oct 21, 2012 10:27pm
Please include the whole tweet next time. Fixed.LJ;1301297 wrote:Adam Schefter ‏@AdamSchefter Excluding any Brown's QB, Joe Flacco’s Total QBR, a metric that accounts for everything a QB does, was 0.3 on the 0-100 scale, the lowest rating for any QB since 2008
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Oct 21, 2012 10:31pm
Yeah no way is Flacco's game worse than 12/35, 118 yds, 0 TDs, 4 INTs
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Oct 21, 2012 10:36pm
sleeper;1301301 wrote:Please include the whole tweet next time. Fixed.
That was the whole tweet. Thanks.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Oct 21, 2012 10:41pm
The QBR in that game was 1.2SportsAndLady;1301306 wrote:Yeah no way is Flacco's game worse than 12/35, 118 yds, 0 TDs, 4 INTs
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Oct 21, 2012 10:45pm
Well that tells me all I need to know about the QBR thenLJ;1301314 wrote:The QBR in that game was 1.2
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Oct 21, 2012 10:50pm
SportsAndLady;1301318 wrote:Well that tells me all I need to know about the QBR then
NEAT
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
Oct 21, 2012 11:21pm
QBR is better cause it factors in everything. I think it does sacks taken, fumbles, tipped passes and yards per attempt (aka, bad to check down each time)SportsAndLady;1301318 wrote:Well that tells me all I need to know about the QBR then
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Oct 21, 2012 11:30pm
Take it easy pal, I didn't intend to hurt your feelings regarding the QBR.LJ;1301322 wrote:NEAT
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Oct 21, 2012 11:31pm
You should let Mike know, maybe Sam.SportsAndLady;1301385 wrote:Take it easy pal, I didn't intend to hurt your feelings regarding the QBR.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Oct 21, 2012 11:32pm
I will let them know you get your feelings hurt when you have an opinion on the QBR.LJ;1301386 wrote:You should let Mike know, maybe Sam.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Oct 21, 2012 11:35pm
SportsAndLady;1301388 wrote:I will let them know you get your feelings hurt when you have an opinion on the QBR.
Did I? Thanks for telling me. That's interesting news.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Oct 22, 2012 4:43am
The QBR is a joke. A QB could have a terrible beginning of a game (2-3 picks), come on strong at the end and still have a high rating. Dalton had 3 TD's & 3 INT's against the Browns while Weeden had 2 TD's and 0 INT's. Dalton's QBR was higher.
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Oct 22, 2012 5:43am
BR1986FB;1301430 wrote:The QBR is a joke. A QB could have a terrible beginning of a game (2-3 picks), come on strong at the end and still have a high rating. Dalton had 3 TD's & 3 INT's against the Browns while Weeden had 2 TD's and 0 INT's. Dalton's QBR was higher.
Yeah....that's not good
Everything has to be rated....if you watch a decent amount of football you'll know who the better QB's are....and if you don't watch a decent amount of football you don't care anyways.
Raw Dawgin' it
Posts: 11,466
Oct 22, 2012 6:56am
Patriots secondary is atrocious. They got lit up by Sanchez, the same Sanchez that couldn't even get 100 yards against the Colts.
said_aouita
Posts: 8,532
Oct 22, 2012 7:03am
What an awesome MNF game tonight. :thumbup:
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Oct 22, 2012 7:12am
BR1986FB;1301430 wrote:The QBR is a joke. A QB could have a terrible beginning of a game (2-3 picks), come on strong at the end and still have a high rating. Dalton had 3 TD's & 3 INT's against the Browns while Weeden had 2 TD's and 0 INT's. Dalton's QBR was higher.
Dalton had a higher %, ypa, yards, more TDs,higher rushing ypc.
Weeden is also credited with an INT
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Oct 22, 2012 7:17am
I understand the issues with it but if you look at the seasons overall qbr rankings, they are pretty accurate