2012 NFL Random Chatter

Pro Sports 4,594 replies 102,584 views
T
Tiernan
Posts: 13,021
Oct 21, 2012 7:51pm
gerb131;1301102 wrote:Lucky ass Pats. They should have been beaten, I think if Hill makes that catch the Jets cash it in.
...and then all the pigs fly out of all our asses.
gerb131's avatar
gerb131
Posts: 9,932
Oct 21, 2012 7:54pm
Tiernan;1301109 wrote:...and then all the pigs fly out of all our asses.
LOL but the Pats aren't the normal Pats this year they are hiding things just doing it better than the Steelers.
justincredible's avatar
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Oct 21, 2012 8:09pm
gerb131;1301102 wrote:Lucky ass Pats. They should have been beaten, I think if Hill makes that catch the Jets cash it in.
That Hill drop was absolutely brutal. I agree that the Jets probably win if he catches that. Oh well.
like_that's avatar
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Oct 21, 2012 8:27pm
justincredible;1301129 wrote:That Hill drop was absolutely brutal. I agree that the Jets probably win if he catches that. Oh well.
Now you know how it feels to have Greg Little on your team.
LJ's avatar
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Oct 21, 2012 8:32pm
Ohio State Walk-On Nate Ebner was on the field during the Jets OT poessesion
justincredible's avatar
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Oct 21, 2012 8:36pm
like_that;1301158 wrote:Now you know how it feels to have Greg Little on your team.
I DON'T LIKE IT.
LJ's avatar
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Oct 21, 2012 10:20pm
Adam Schefter ‏@AdamSchefter Joe Flacco’s Total QBR, a metric that accounts for everything a QB does, was 0.3 on the 0-100 scale, the lowest rating for any QB since 2008
justincredible's avatar
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Oct 21, 2012 10:27pm
LJ;1301297 wrote:Adam Schefter ‏@AdamSchefter Joe Flacco’s Total QBR, a metric that accounts for everything a QB does, was 0.3 on the 0-100 scale, the lowest rating for any QB since 2008
/Sanchez'd
sleeper's avatar
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Oct 21, 2012 10:27pm
LJ;1301297 wrote:Adam Schefter ‏@AdamSchefter Excluding any Brown's QB, Joe Flacco’s Total QBR, a metric that accounts for everything a QB does, was 0.3 on the 0-100 scale, the lowest rating for any QB since 2008
Please include the whole tweet next time. Fixed.
SportsAndLady's avatar
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Oct 21, 2012 10:31pm
Yeah no way is Flacco's game worse than 12/35, 118 yds, 0 TDs, 4 INTs
LJ's avatar
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Oct 21, 2012 10:36pm
sleeper;1301301 wrote:Please include the whole tweet next time. Fixed.

That was the whole tweet. Thanks.
LJ's avatar
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Oct 21, 2012 10:41pm
SportsAndLady;1301306 wrote:Yeah no way is Flacco's game worse than 12/35, 118 yds, 0 TDs, 4 INTs
The QBR in that game was 1.2
SportsAndLady's avatar
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Oct 21, 2012 10:45pm
LJ;1301314 wrote:The QBR in that game was 1.2
Well that tells me all I need to know about the QBR then
LJ's avatar
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Oct 21, 2012 10:50pm
SportsAndLady;1301318 wrote:Well that tells me all I need to know about the QBR then

NEAT
Laley23's avatar
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
Oct 21, 2012 11:21pm
SportsAndLady;1301318 wrote:Well that tells me all I need to know about the QBR then
QBR is better cause it factors in everything. I think it does sacks taken, fumbles, tipped passes and yards per attempt (aka, bad to check down each time)
SportsAndLady's avatar
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Oct 21, 2012 11:30pm
LJ;1301322 wrote:NEAT
Take it easy pal, I didn't intend to hurt your feelings regarding the QBR.
LJ's avatar
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Oct 21, 2012 11:31pm
SportsAndLady;1301385 wrote:Take it easy pal, I didn't intend to hurt your feelings regarding the QBR.
You should let Mike know, maybe Sam.
SportsAndLady's avatar
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Oct 21, 2012 11:32pm
LJ;1301386 wrote:You should let Mike know, maybe Sam.
I will let them know you get your feelings hurt when you have an opinion on the QBR.
LJ's avatar
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Oct 21, 2012 11:35pm
SportsAndLady;1301388 wrote:I will let them know you get your feelings hurt when you have an opinion on the QBR.

Did I? Thanks for telling me. That's interesting news.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Oct 22, 2012 4:43am
The QBR is a joke. A QB could have a terrible beginning of a game (2-3 picks), come on strong at the end and still have a high rating. Dalton had 3 TD's & 3 INT's against the Browns while Weeden had 2 TD's and 0 INT's. Dalton's QBR was higher.
Ironman92's avatar
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Oct 22, 2012 5:43am
BR1986FB;1301430 wrote:The QBR is a joke. A QB could have a terrible beginning of a game (2-3 picks), come on strong at the end and still have a high rating. Dalton had 3 TD's & 3 INT's against the Browns while Weeden had 2 TD's and 0 INT's. Dalton's QBR was higher.

Yeah....that's not good

Everything has to be rated....if you watch a decent amount of football you'll know who the better QB's are....and if you don't watch a decent amount of football you don't care anyways.
Raw Dawgin' it's avatar
Raw Dawgin' it
Posts: 11,466
Oct 22, 2012 6:56am
Patriots secondary is atrocious. They got lit up by Sanchez, the same Sanchez that couldn't even get 100 yards against the Colts.
said_aouita's avatar
said_aouita
Posts: 8,532
Oct 22, 2012 7:03am
What an awesome MNF game tonight. :thumbup:
LJ's avatar
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Oct 22, 2012 7:12am
BR1986FB;1301430 wrote:The QBR is a joke. A QB could have a terrible beginning of a game (2-3 picks), come on strong at the end and still have a high rating. Dalton had 3 TD's & 3 INT's against the Browns while Weeden had 2 TD's and 0 INT's. Dalton's QBR was higher.

Dalton had a higher %, ypa, yards, more TDs,higher rushing ypc.

Weeden is also credited with an INT
LJ's avatar
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Oct 22, 2012 7:17am
I understand the issues with it but if you look at the seasons overall qbr rankings, they are pretty accurate