Laley23;1219939 wrote:Also, good pick. I have a few great ones/trades as well over the years.

Traded Prince and A-Rod in 2007 for Miguel Cabrera and Justin Upton. Drafted Kershaw before his ML Debut. Drafted Paul Goldschmidt this year (hoping it pans out as well). I was JUST ONE pick away from Harper this year in the 7th round.

Im pretty good at nabbing pitchers early in their careers. I had Lincecum as well as a rookie, for 3 years. But we have stipulations on keepers, so we cant have them for more than a certain number of years.

Nicely done, you would fit well in our league. I too had Lincecum his rookie year (actually picked him up before he was called up), and was the first to jump on Harper and Darvish (in the offseason) and had a solid draft this year (landed HanRam, David Wright, Mike Trout, Colby Lewis and Chapman after keeping McCutchen, Castro and Strasburg). I really crapped the bed on a few keepers though (Ike Davis, Dustin Ackley and Lincecum, to name a few).

In our league, we assign 25 years of contracts and get 2 franchise players (that are not tied to contract years, one pitcher and one batter).

Big debate starting here in DC now. As the Nats are in first, pretty much at the All-Star break, do you sit Strasburg down at the end of the season?
One writer says no: http://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/nationals/nationals-should-take-no-chances-with-stephen-strasburgs-innings-limit/2012/07/05/gJQAbS6TQW_story.html

I lean you have to take it easy with him, but don't shut him down. For all we know this could be the Nats only shot for a run. Sure they have young talent, but as we have seen with the Indians over the years, never take a good team for granted.

BigAppleBuckeye;1219965 wrote:Nicely done, you would fit well in our league. I too had Lincecum his rookie year (actually picked him up before he was called up), and was the first to jump on Harper and Darvish (in the offseason) and had a solid draft this year (landed HanRam, David Wright, Mike Trout, Colby Lewis and Chapman after keeping McCutchen, Castro and Strasburg). I really crapped the bed on a few keepers though (Ike Davis, Dustin Ackley and Lincecum, to name a few).

In our league, we assign 25 years of contracts and get 2 franchise players (that are not tied to contract years, one pitcher and one batter).

ours is somewhat similar. You can keep 5 players each year. 1 hitter, 1 pitcher, 1 either, 1 FA Pick-up, and 1 that takes your draft spot in that round (so a later pick is immensely more valuable if they pan out).

Stipulations are you cant keep anyone more than 6 years (traded players KEEP years), You only have 15 years to go around, so you cant have all 5 players at 6 years either. It really comes down to 4 keepers though, as each year you must have at least 1 new keeper that you drafted the year before (per, losing that spot in the draft). You also cannot drop a player hoping he clears waivers and pick him back up as your FA keeper. We had a guy do this over the 4th weekend. No one was online all weekend to see it, and he got Hanley. It was an amazing move on his part, so I put the rule in place next season.

As for Ackley, I thought he would be a stud this year. My team is loaded though.

C - Ruiz
1B - Goldschmidt
2B - Kipnis
3B - Miggy
SS - Asdrubal
OF(3) - Granderson, Choo, Holliday
UTL - Josh Hamilton

SP - Kershaw, Cueto, Matt Moore, Hellickson, Pettite, Feliz
RP - Chapman, Pestano, Frieri, Valverde, Street,

ptown_trojans_1;1219981 wrote:Big debate starting here in DC now. As the Nats are in first, pretty much at the All-Star break, do you sit Strasburg down at the end of the season?
One writer says no: http://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/nationals/nationals-should-take-no-chances-with-stephen-strasburgs-innings-limit/2012/07/05/gJQAbS6TQW_story.html

I lean you have to take it easy with him, but don't shut him down. For all we know this could be the Nats only shot for a run. Sure they have young talent, but as we have seen with the Indians over the years, never take a good team for granted.

Id do what the Rays did with Hellickson last year and Price the year before. Skip a few starts here and there. The innings limit can stay in effect, but you dont shut him down completely.

Laley23;1219984 wrote:ours is somewhat similar. You can keep 5 players each year. 1 hitter, 1 pitcher, 1 either, 1 FA Pick-up, and 1 that takes your draft spot in that round (so a later pick is immensely more valuable if they pan out).

Stipulations are you cant keep anyone more than 6 years (traded players KEEP years), You only have 15 years to go around, so you cant have all 5 players at 6 years either. It really comes down to 4 keepers though, as each year you must have at least 1 new keeper that you drafted the year before (per, losing that spot in the draft). You also cannot drop a player hoping he clears waivers and pick him back up as your FA keeper. We had a guy do this over the 4th weekend. No one was online all weekend to see it, and he got Hanley. It was an amazing move on his part, so I put the rule in place next season.

As for Ackley, I thought he would be a stud this year. My team is loaded though.

C - Ruiz
1B - Goldschmidt
2B - Kipnis
3B - Miggy
SS - Asdrubal
OF(3) - Granderson, Choo, Holliday
UTL - Josh Hamilton

SP - Kershaw, Cueto, Matt Moore, Hellickson, Pettite, Feliz
RP - Chapman, Pestano, Frieri, Valverde, Street,

VERY nice squad right there. I am in first place (12 team league), but my pitching has struggled (even though its awesome on paper):

1B - Ike Davis (weak spot)
2B - Ackely/Gordon Beckham (weak spot)
SS - Starlin Castro
3B - David Wright
OF - Andrew McCutchen
OF - Mike Trout
OF - Bryce Harper
U - Hanley Ramirez
U - Ryan Zimmerman
C- Jonathan Lucroy/Willin Rosario
SP - Stephen Strasburg
SP - CJ Wilson
SP - Yu Darvish
SP - Tim Lincecum (ughh)
SP - Colby Lewis
SP - mix and match (Marco Estrada, Jamie Garcia, Jeff Samardzija)
RP - Chapman
RP - Clippard

ptown_trojans_1;1219981 wrote:Big debate starting here in DC now. As the Nats are in first, pretty much at the All-Star break, do you sit Strasburg down at the end of the season?
One writer says no: http://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/nationals/nationals-should-take-no-chances-with-stephen-strasburgs-innings-limit/2012/07/05/gJQAbS6TQW_story.html

I lean you have to take it easy with him, but don't shut him down. For all we know this could be the Nats only shot for a run. Sure they have young talent, but as we have seen with the Indians over the years, never take a good team for granted.

I think they should shut him down now.

If they let him get to 160 or whatever the number is and shut him down it would be one of the biggest sissified moves of all-time.

Don't make this hard. Be creative. He pitches tonight. He has not thrown over 7 innings all year...he's on pace for exactly 200 innings. The Nats don't start back until next Friday....Put him last in the rotation and he won't pitch until Tues the 17th. (game #88), then (game #93), (game #98)...now you are to August and he's at 118-120 inn max.

In August go with a 6 man rotation for two times through and then DL him after game (#110)....much of the staff is very young and August is the hottest month...why only baby Strasburg's arm?......don't pitch him again until game # 128. At this point he is at a max of 136-141 inn.

From there he would pitch in game 133, 138, 143, 148, 153 and 158....leaving him to be the starter to open a series or be the pitcher of the opening WC game.

This would put him a max of 172 innings...likely around 168.

1 start in divisional series
2 max in NLCS
2 max in WS

Worst case scenario is he pitches 200 innings and they either win or lose the World Series.

Or pitch him every turn the rest of the year...get him to 200 to start the playoffs and he might get up to 235 innings.

Maybe he should just retire.

karen lotz;1220048 wrote:Maybe he should just retire.

Indeed. You can't have a burnt-out arm if you never use it. Amirite?

Heretic;1220056 wrote:Indeed. You can't have a burnt-out arm if you never use it. Amirite?

exactly.

That'd be the most pussy move ever if they shut him down lol

SportsAndLady;1220070 wrote:That'd be the most pussy move ever if they shut him down lol

I agree, especially if they are leading the division our even like 2 games out of the wildcard. I can't imagine them going through with it. Fans would say fuck off to management.

Patriots 6
Jets 6

Early 1st qtr

The Rockies "75" pitch limit is so odd. Pomeranz had 6.1 shutout innings allowing only 1 hit tonight but passed the limit so he got pulled.

Mulva;1220155 wrote:The Rockies "75" pitch limit is so odd. Pomeranz had 6.1 shutout innings allowing only 1 hit tonight but passed the limit so he got pulled.

Teams in the 70's had 4 man rotations and often went over 250 innings.

Andruw Jones went 2005 hitting 2 HR and having a Web Gem against the Red Sox today.

Make that 3 HR and 2 Web Gems today for Andruw.

Goodness.

Lol Tim Lincecum is a scrub.

Rotinaj;1220861 wrote:Lol Tim Lincecum is a scrub.

I'm lucky I skipped his start today in fantasy. I am going to watch his start after the all star game. If he has another bad outing I'm cutting bait

Rotinaj;1220861 wrote:Lol Tim Lincecum is a scrub.

You better hope his dad doesn't see that post. He'd probably make angry comments about it.

His dad can gfh.

Karen...watching the Futures game? Christian Bethancourt is looking good behind the dish so far. Haven't seen either of the Reds players yet, but the announcers wanted to see Billy Hamilton try to steal against Bethancourt.

nope not watching but did read on twitter that he was having a good game throwing. he has a cannon but might be limited offensively. seems like McCann is unlikely to re up with Atlanta after his current deal runs out in a year or two, hopefully Bethancourt will be ready to step in.

Andruw Jones with his 4th HR at Fenway in the past 22 hours.