sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Nov 19, 2012 3:36pm
Rutgers bowl record since 2000: 5-1sjmvsfscs08;1325122 wrote:Leading from the middle, eh?
Notre Dame's bowl record since 2000 : 2-6
Curious where you have ND leading from?
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Nov 19, 2012 3:42pm
The irony here is that he (Tobias/sjmvs...) is posting this stuff from the campus of THE Ohio State University, where he's receiving one of the finest educations available in this great country of ours.sleeper;1325150 wrote:Rutgers bowl record since 2000: 5-1
Notre Dame's bowl record since 2000 : 2-6
Curious where you have ND leading from?
Scarlet_Buckeye
Posts: 5,264
Nov 19, 2012 3:59pm
LOL at this.Classyposter58;1323266 wrote:Who's gonna go undefeated anymore in the days of super conferences? Seriously so many good opponents in your conference. I made a ton of super conferences in NCAA Football 13(I know it's a video game) but I have years where there are no one loss teams even except for me of course
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Nov 19, 2012 4:03pm
People claim the rest of the B1G sucks outside of UM and OSUsjmvsfscs08;1325122 wrote:Leading from the middle, eh?
B1G adds schools to make the rest of the conference stronger
Same people make fun of the B1G for making the rest of it's conference stronger
???
Profit
Mohican00
Posts: 3,394
Nov 19, 2012 8:16pm
Rumor milll has it that there will be push for 16-team superconferences soon.....early talks have UVA and UNC rounding out the B1G. Again, rumors only but the day of the big conferences may be here
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Nov 19, 2012 9:27pm
While the ACC is at it, I'd love to see Florida State and Clemson join the SEC. Put Missouri back in the SEC West, Florida State and Clemson in the East.
Pick6
Posts: 14,946
Nov 19, 2012 9:36pm
saw SDSU and Boise are exploring rejoining the MWC. Didnt the Big East implement a hefty buyout after Pitt and Syracuse bailed?
ts1227
Posts: 12,319
Nov 19, 2012 9:42pm
I thought all they did was double it from 5M to 10M (which is a lot, but isn't shit compared to the ACC)Pick6;1325487 wrote:saw SDSU and Boise are exploring rejoining the MWC. Didnt the Big East implement a hefty buyout after Pitt and Syracuse bailed?
Here's an article about them looking at going back, since the new playoff demotes the Big East to MWC status.
http://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2012/11/19/3668312/boise-state-mountain-west-conference-realignment
ernest_t_bass
Posts: 24,984
Nov 19, 2012 9:58pm
Why wouldn't Boise go PAC 12 route?
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Nov 19, 2012 9:59pm
Pick6;1325138 wrote:Rutgers has as many losses as the best teams from the shithole ACC Notre Dame just signed a deal with.
The flip side is the B1G just extended an invite to a mid-level program from that "shithole" ACC that you speak of.
The Big East and ACC take a beating on here and elsewhere (it is warranted) and the B1G just invited teams from each. Both accepted. Rutgers is a decent football acquisition (I'm sure it was more about their market though), Maryland a decent hoops one. The B1G coulda done worse but also coulda done a lot better.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Nov 19, 2012 10:02pm
ernest_t_bass;1325521 wrote:Why wouldn't Boise go PAC 12 route?
Because they won't get invited to the PAC 12 ever?
Pick6
Posts: 14,946
Nov 19, 2012 10:03pm
yep you wont see me defending the Maryland acquisition in terms of competitiveness. All about the $$$killer_ewok;1325523 wrote:The flip side is the B1G just extended an invite to a mid-level program from that "shithole" ACC that you speak of.
The Big East and ACC take a beating on here and elsewhere (it is warranted) and the B1G just invited teams from each. Both accepted. Rutgers is a decent football acquisition (I'm sure it was more about their market though), Maryland a decent hoops one. The B1G coulda done worse but also coulda done a lot better.
B
bigkahuna
Posts: 4,454
Nov 19, 2012 10:03pm
Damn it, I was hoping Maryland was going to get added to the Legends Division, so that we could keep the M,N Iowa thing going. Incase you haven't noticed, All of the M and N schools are in the Legends +Iowa. Now, it's going to be a cluster fuck trying to keep everything straight.gorocks99;1324971 wrote:Well, uh, nevermind about my map:
https://twitter.com/McMurphyESPN/status/270597775006236672
Pick6
Posts: 14,946
Nov 19, 2012 10:04pm
Utah and Colorado disagree. Any talks of no intentions to expand should be taken with a grain of salt.karen lotz;1325527 wrote:Because they won't get invited to the PAC 12 ever?
Crimson streak
Posts: 9,002
Nov 19, 2012 10:05pm
Pick6;1325532 wrote:Utah and Colorado disagree. Any talks of no intentions to expand should be taken with a grain of salt.
Boise brings nothing compared to those schools
Pick6
Posts: 14,946
Nov 19, 2012 10:05pm
on the field they do.Crimson streak;1325534 wrote:Boise brings nothing compared to those schools
ernest_t_bass
Posts: 24,984
Nov 19, 2012 10:07pm
karen lotz;1325527 wrote:Because they won't get invited to the PAC 12 ever?
I'd still push hard to garner that invite.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Nov 19, 2012 10:08pm
Pick6;1325536 wrote:on the field they do.
If you hadn't noticed by the B1G's expansion, on the field means very little. I also don't think Boise is much better than a junior college academically. That isn't helping their case at all.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Nov 19, 2012 10:09pm
ernest_t_bass;1325537 wrote:I'd still push hard to garner that invite.
Boise is currently trying to decide between the Big East and the Mountain West. They understand where they stand.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Nov 19, 2012 10:12pm
How hard would you push to garner it?ernest_t_bass;1325537 wrote:I'd still push hard to garner that invite.
Crimson streak
Posts: 9,002
Nov 19, 2012 10:12pm
karen lotz;1325539 wrote:If you hadn't noticed by the B1G's expansion, on the field means very little. I also don't think Boise is much better than a junior college academically. That isn't helping their case at all.
This. Has nothing to do with on field stuff. It's all about the $$$$$
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Nov 19, 2012 10:19pm
With the addition of Maryland and Rutgers, the B1G will have 4 of the top 17 LOSINGest programs in college football.
ernest_t_bass
Posts: 24,984
Nov 19, 2012 10:21pm
SportsAndLady;1325544 wrote:How hard would you push to garner it?
Til their ass bled.
gorocks99
Posts: 10,760
Nov 19, 2012 10:23pm
What?WebFire;1325552 wrote:With the addition of Maryland and Rutgers, the B1G will have 4 of the top 17 LOSINGest programs in college football.
Maryland is #39 all time with 614 wins. Rutgers is #37 with 623 wins. By winning percentage, Maryland is #70, Rutgers is #79. That's not close to bottom 17.
http://cfbdatawarehouse.com/data/misc/div_ia_wins.php
Ranked by total wins:
1. Michigan
3. Nebraska
5. Ohio State
13. Penn State
28. Minnesota
31. Michigan State
32. Wisconsin
37. Rutgers
39. Maryland
40. Iowa
43. Purdue
46. Illinois
83. Northwestern
98. Indiana
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Nov 19, 2012 10:23pm
And 4 of the top 7 all-time winningest programs too.WebFire;1325552 wrote:With the addition of Maryland and Rutgers, the B1G will have 4 of the top 17 LOSINGest programs in college football.