MMA News

Serious Business 12,850 replies 418,649 views
robj55's avatar
robj55
Posts: 9,511
Feb 5, 2012 10:42pm
I Wear Pants;1076586 wrote:Just like Diaz, his fans can't take a loss.
I can take the loss, it was just controversial that's all, arguments can be made both ways. Like I said there were a ton of trainers and fighters that thought Nick won rounds 1,2 and 5. Carlos had a great game plan and that was the only way he could compete with Nick.
robj55's avatar
robj55
Posts: 9,511
Feb 5, 2012 10:43pm
I Wear Pants;1076595 wrote:The only time he was "running" was when he got backed into the cage and circled towards the center like a skilled, intelligent fighter instead of going "oh, I'm against the cage I better let Nick punch me a bunch".

The Diaz whiners are usually the ones saying things like "well maybe he shouldn't have let Nick push him around or bother him with taunting". Condit didn't and the same argument can be made "well maybe Diaz shouldn't have let Carlos kick him in the leg and head so much and should have checked maybe just one kick?".
There shouldn't be a rematch for this.
Shogun got a rematch with Machida, Nick shouldn't get a rematch with Carlos while GSP is out til November? Not sure I understand that logic with a controversial match.
robj55's avatar
robj55
Posts: 9,511
Feb 5, 2012 10:45pm
Hb31187;1076610 wrote:Hes not nearly quick enough for good 205'ers
I agree, he would have a ton of power but would struggle to connect, he has had trouble connecting with 250 lb'ers.
I
I Wear Pants
Posts: 16,223
Feb 5, 2012 10:53pm
robj55;1076618 wrote:Shogun got a rematch with Machida, Nick shouldn't get a rematch with Carlos while GSP is out til November? Not sure I understand that logic with a controversial match.
Because in that fight Shogun landed more strikes. Not the case at all. Condit landed 150% of the number of strikes Diaz did.

I
I Wear Pants
Posts: 16,223
Feb 5, 2012 10:53pm
robj55's avatar
robj55
Posts: 9,511
Feb 5, 2012 11:02pm
I Wear Pants;1076636 wrote:
Using one gif to tell the tale of an entire fight?
robj55's avatar
robj55
Posts: 9,511
Feb 5, 2012 11:03pm
I Wear Pants;1076634 wrote:Because in that fight Shogun landed more strikes. Not the case at all. Condit landed 150% of the number of strikes Diaz did.

Nick landed more to the body and head, Carlos landed way more to the legs. I already made my case for why he won the 1st, 2nd and 5th rounds. The fight is judged on a round by round basis, not in totality.
robj55's avatar
robj55
Posts: 9,511
Feb 5, 2012 11:04pm
We all know you are a Diaz brother hater so an argument with you is pointless.
I
I Wear Pants
Posts: 16,223
Feb 5, 2012 11:06pm
Look at the Fight Metric. http://blog.fightmetric.com/2012/02/condit-vs-diaz-official-ufc-statistics.html

Condit got the better of the striking every round but the 2nd.
I
I Wear Pants
Posts: 16,223
Feb 5, 2012 11:09pm
robj55;1076649 wrote:Nick landed more to the body and head, Carlos landed way more to the legs. I already made my case for why he won the 1st, 2nd and 5th rounds. The fight is judged on a round by round basis, not in totality.

Here's a copypasta from Reddit that says a lot of what I feel:
As time goes on, and I learn more about the sport, I always find that I appreciate what a chess match MMA is at the highest levels. It comes down to so much more than just brawling, but most MMA fans will never appreciate this.


Nick Diaz is a nightmare of a fighter. GSP was wrong: Fitch was not the Terminator, Nick Diaz is. Nick Diaz has an iron chin, is not afraid to eat shots, constantly presses forward, and throws an enormous volume of punches straight down the pipe at his opponent's faces. He never gets tired and he never quits. Once he gets someone pinned against the cage, he's basically unbeatable.

His little brother Nate used the exact same strategy against Cerrone, and made a multiple time Muay Thai champion look like an amateur striker. Nick pressed BJ Penn against the cage, and decisively outboxed one of MMA's greatest all time boxers. Not even Paul Daley, a man notorious for his punching power, could do enough damage to Nick to even slow him down.

Condit knew this, and he refused to fail where his predecessors had. Much like a bullfighter dodges a bull, Carlos would not have any of Nick's 'bullying' strategy. He knew how to circle out and not get pinned against the cage.


Make no mistake about it, Carlos was not afraid to trade strikes with Nick. The Fightmetric proves this. But everytime Nick started to get the upperhand, Carlos moved out of danger. He fought a perfect match. Carlos's movements were downright graceful, and well timed. Much like "Judo" translates to the "gentle way," Carlos refused to absorb the brunt of Nick's offense. He traded while he was winning, and immediately moved when Nick started landing.


I don't think most people understand the amount of skill and discipline it takes for a fighter to be able to pull off a gameplan like this. Most fighters with Condit's resume would have fallen in love with their fists and tried to take Diaz's head off when the first taunts came. But again Condit would not have any of it. Condit trusted his striking enough to trade with Diaz on his own terms, but gracefully refused to play into Diaz's hand.


Unfortunately, there is a rush of people complaining that Condit refused to actually 'fight' Diaz and that he kept running away. These people can't understand how masterfully Condit beat Diaz. It was perfect. He could not have been any more of a Kryptonite to Diaz's Superman.

Condit had the brains to figure out the plan, the talent to execute the plan, the conditioning to see it through, and the discipline to stick to it. This, ladies and gentlemen, is true talent. It is marvellous. We just witnessed a great fight, and it is a shame and a blackeye for the sport as a whole that anyone would expect Condit to brawl with Diaz against the cage otherwise suffer being called a coward.
Please, appreciate MMA for not only the violence, but also the athleticism, the talent, and the IQ it takes to not only win, but to win against the best of the best.

TL;DR People shouldn't call Carlos a coward. They should appreciate how masterfully he beat Diaz.



EDIT: It seems that a lot of people are bringing up the point that they're upset that Condit chose to fight for points instead of a finish. There's a lot to be said for this, although personally I would say that Condit did mostly the same things that he always does - flying knees, headkicks, spinning backfists- things that normally knock people the fuck out. The only difference was the constant pressure that Diaz put on him which didn't let him setup as accurately or with as much power. Also Nick has a monster chin. Meh, styles make fights.


EDIT 2: Hmm, seems like most anti Condit arguments boil down to the fact that people are upset that he wasn't willing to brawl. A lot of people are saying it's 'bad for the sport.' I don't see how, unless you're appealing to fans who just want to see a brawl. If that's your position, you may as well advocate banning clinches, ground games, or really anything that doesnt involve standing toe to toe and trading head punches.
robj55's avatar
robj55
Posts: 9,511
Feb 5, 2012 11:11pm
I Wear Pants;1076655 wrote:Look at the Fight Metric. http://blog.fightmetric.com/2012/02/condit-vs-diaz-official-ufc-statistics.html

Condit got the better of the striking every round but the 2nd.
And the difference in the first was so minimal that I gave Nick the round because of octagon control and aggression, he dictated the pace of the fight. The 5th round Carlos landed nothing significant and the difference in strikes was minimal and Nick got a take down and secured back mount. He then proceed to almost get a rnc and went for an armbar, by far the most dominant position of the fight. Like I said, it was no domination or clear cut victory, arguments can be made both ways. I was a huge fan of Carlos Condit before this fight but he sold out to get that belt plain and simple imo.
robj55's avatar
robj55
Posts: 9,511
Feb 5, 2012 11:14pm
I Wear Pants;1076661 wrote:Here's a copypasta from Reddit that says a lot of what I feel:
I agree with some of that too, but he fought like he never has before and sold out. He had a great game plan and executed beautifully. But imo he avoided the fight and won, knowing that he couldn't beat Nick. I am not saying you are wrong in saying you felt Carlos won, that is your opinion and you are entitled to it.
I
I Wear Pants
Posts: 16,223
Feb 5, 2012 11:16pm
Why is it "avoiding" and "running", etc when Condit sticks and moves but Ali made his career on it and he's the GOAT?

No one has answered why Condit's strategy was cowardly or running or any of that.
robj55's avatar
robj55
Posts: 9,511
Feb 5, 2012 11:22pm
I Wear Pants;1076672 wrote:Why is it "avoiding" and "running", etc when Condit sticks and moves but Ali made his career on it and he's the GOAT?

No one has answered why Condit's strategy was cowardly or running or any of that.
It was cowardly because he avoided the fight, he used the leg kick as a jab and did minimal damage with kicks. He built his name on being a killer, hence the nick name. As soon as he fights someone who is superior to him in the stand up and on the ground he finds a strategy that goes against everything he has built his reputation on. That to me is why he sold out. Can you name me another Condit fight where he has fought like that? Greg Jackson is ruining MMA for me and a lot of others. Every time his fighters fight someone who is superior he comes up with some point fighting avoid the fight gameplan and it's disgusting imo. I know I'm not the only one who feels that way. Anyone who saw the Guida Pettis fight knows what I'm talking about.
I
I Wear Pants
Posts: 16,223
Feb 5, 2012 11:27pm
And Diaz used his jab like a jab that did minimal damage. Diaz landed 8 power shots to the head, Condit landed 12.

Again, why do you give Nick a pass for using his jab but then call Condit a coward?

If Nick was superior why didn't he, you know, check some kicks or take Condit down more or...win the fight? Condit beat him. Simple as that.

Why do you think everyone should be forced to fight Nick's fight? And Condit threw flying knees, head kicks, spinning back fists and elbows, and a bunch of other shots that he always does. Nick just has a good chin so was never rocked enough for Carlos to go in and go wild.

The only outcome you would be happy with is a Diaz win. Condit used the leg kick to inflict damage and win the fight, not to avoid it. Leg kicks do damage and count.
robj55's avatar
robj55
Posts: 9,511
Feb 5, 2012 11:30pm
I Wear Pants;1076690 wrote:And Diaz used his jab like a jab that did minimal damage. Diaz landed 8 power shots to the head, Condit landed 12.

Again, why do you give Nick a pass for using his jab but then call Condit a coward?
Nick walked forward the whole fight, Carlos walked backwards and away from Nick, which seems cowardly to you?
I
I Wear Pants
Posts: 16,223
Feb 5, 2012 11:37pm
So you think Jon Jones was a coward for his fight with Rampage?

He did the same exact thing.

Now your definition of winning a fight is merely walking forwards, excellent.
I
I Wear Pants
Posts: 16,223
Feb 5, 2012 11:38pm
robj55;1076692 wrote:Nick walked forward the whole fight, Carlos walked backwards and away from Nick, which seems cowardly to you?
Neither was cowardly.

"329: Total strikes thrown by Condit, 71 more than Diaz attempted in their 25-minute encounter.

4: Rounds where Condit landed more significant strikes than Diaz. “The Natural Born Killer” outlanded Diaz in round one (29 to 23); round three (32 to 22), round four (36 to 11) and round five (25 to 17). "

Oh look, Condit threw more total strikes and landed more hard ones than Diaz. What a coward.

Here's a picture of him being a coward:


By the way. Nelson was moving forward the whole fight so the coward Werdum should have lost. Damage doesn't matter.
robj55's avatar
robj55
Posts: 9,511
Feb 5, 2012 11:40pm
I Wear Pants;1076703 wrote:So you think Jon Jones was a coward for his fight with Rampage?

He did the same exact thing.

Now your definition of winning a fight is merely walking forwards, excellent.
Not at all, I'm a Machida fan for fucks sake lol
I
I Wear Pants
Posts: 16,223
Feb 5, 2012 11:48pm
Then why is Condit a coward? He didn't move backwards the whole fight, just when Diaz began to get the better of the striking or had him against the cage which is when he circled to reengage. Which is what any good fighter should do. If Nick won the fight even with Carlos "running" he should have been the one to do the most effective striking and most damage. But he wasn't.

Also, this was sweet:
I
I Wear Pants
Posts: 16,223
Feb 5, 2012 11:53pm
bigdaddy2003's avatar
bigdaddy2003
Posts: 7,384
Feb 6, 2012 12:03am
I'll be honest when Diaz was talking shit with his mouth and arms I was hoping he would get knocked out. I wanted to see Diaz and GSP but I can't say Condit didn't win.
Raw Dawgin' it's avatar
Raw Dawgin' it
Posts: 11,466
Feb 6, 2012 8:06am
Zombaypirate;1075691 wrote:IF? really IF? IF ands and buts were candy and nuts we would all have a Merry Christmas.

Wow that impressive 11 are all HOF's Runs into Condit and loses good riddance
Yeah IF, how many fighters fall into their trap? Condit showed IF you don't and you stick to your game plan then you can beat them. Maynard and Cowboy got caught up in Nate Diazs' trash talk and it played right into his game. He barely lost to Maynard, but he got Maynard out of his bread and butter wrestling by taunting him. Cowboy too, he got into his head and beat the piss out of him.

Your argument makes no sense. You're just a Diaz hatter. I like Condit and hope he beats GSP, but i also like Diaz because he always comes to fight. His game plan was to try and get into Condits head and get him to stand and trade with him and it didn't work. He also got bad advice from his corner telling him he was winning.
J
jmog
Posts: 6,567
Feb 6, 2012 11:29am
I do not believe that moving forward automatically wins you the aggression battle.

Condit threw and landed a lot more strikes, and against either Diaz brother (who throw TONS of strikes) that is an accomplishment in itself. Condit threw, landed, and landed SIGNIFICANT (aka power) strikes at a better pace than Diaz.

Look at Diaz's face after the fight and look at Condits, who was beaten up and who had some redness only?

Also, circling away is not the same as backing up. In wrestling you are not called for stalling if you are returning to the center of the ring, even if that includes circling or backing up. Diaz would stalk while Condit threw strikes, whenever it would end up at the cage Condit would circle out and return to the middle of the Octagon.

If you blame Condit for not playing into Diaz's game of letting himself get pinned against the cage, then isn't it also Diaz's fault for not wanting to stay in the middle of the ring which is where Condit wanted it?

Every possible fight metric used, Condit wins, except for personal opinions.

I had Diaz winning 2 rounds, and even though I gave him round 5 for the TD and superior position, can we please stop with the "almost finished the fight" crap? Anyone who has ever taken BJJ knows that Condit was defending the submissions perfectly and Diaz was never close to a RNC or an armbar. He was definitely working for those, but it was NEVER close.

The power strikes that Condit threw would have KO or TKO'd most fighters, Diaz just has an amazing chin. With the number of power strikes, flying knees, spinning backfists, elbows, head kicks, there is NO WAY you can say he wasn't just as aggressive as Diaz and he was NOT point fighting.

Again, walking forward does not win you the aggression part of the fight automatically, you have to out strike the guy your walking towards.

Also, at every one of those cage instances where Condit circled out, he landed vicious power strikes, many to the body. So lets not act like he was just running out, he struck his way out of those instances.

I actually wanted Diaz to win that fight because I wanted to see a Diaz/GSP fight. However, I just have to laugh at the whining by the Diaz fans.

And please lets not compare this to Shogun/Machida 1 again, Machida got ate alive and his face showed it in that fight. THAT was a controversial decision. Pure damage wasn't even close in the Diaz/Condit fight. Look at the two fighters afterwards.
Raw Dawgin' it's avatar
Raw Dawgin' it
Posts: 11,466
Feb 6, 2012 11:36am
So who thinks Ellenberger gets a title shot with a win? I think Condit vs Ellenberger would be more entertaining than Condit vs GSP. Condit is on record saying he won't wait for GSP.

Thoughts?