K
keato5
Posts: 145
Feb 9, 2012 11:25pm
There were a few tight matches tonight with AC. We pretty much had to win every match with all the forfeits, and thats awfully tough to do against a stud team like AC. Congrats to AC, this could be start of a little run for them. Final score 43-27 I think. CV won at 106, 120, 126 138, 145, and 160. Lost aclose overtime match at 152. I believe we had forfeits at 132, 182, 195, 220, hwt.
K
keato5
Posts: 145
Feb 9, 2012 11:25pm
Nice job Clayton Ray, big win!
B
bigdawg
Posts: 66
Feb 9, 2012 11:39pm
That is a nice win for clayton, what a way to walk into sectionals, has to build his confidence. The msl has some very good freshmen and sophmores, I have a feeling the buckeye is going to be very interesting with atleast 4 teams having a chance to win it next year.keato5;1081782 wrote:Nice job Clayton Ray, big win!
K
kennypowers
Posts: 120
Feb 9, 2012 11:39pm
So how do individual standings look now that league action is over? Just guesses but:
106- Cummings
113- Minnard
120- Kern
126- Knul-Oehlers winner?
132- Dilley
138- Holloway?
145- Luft
152- Horn
160- ?
170- Tipton
182- Leidecker
195- Crum
220- ?
285-?
106- Cummings
113- Minnard
120- Kern
126- Knul-Oehlers winner?
132- Dilley
138- Holloway?
145- Luft
152- Horn
160- ?
170- Tipton
182- Leidecker
195- Crum
220- ?
285-?
K
keato5
Posts: 145
Feb 9, 2012 11:44pm
106- Cummings
113- Minnard
120- Kern
126- Oehlers
132- Knul
138- Dunn
145- Luft
152- Horn
160- ?
170- Tipton
182- Leidecker
195- Crum
220- HT
285- TV
I think this is a little closer.
113- Minnard
120- Kern
126- Oehlers
132- Knul
138- Dunn
145- Luft
152- Horn
160- ?
170- Tipton
182- Leidecker
195- Crum
220- HT
285- TV
I think this is a little closer.
C
Cthelites
Posts: 1,951
Feb 10, 2012 12:35am
Wow thats huge beating Tullius!bigdawg;1081789 wrote:That is a nice win for clayton, what a way to walk into sectionals, has to build his confidence. The msl has some very good freshmen and sophmores, I have a feeling the buckeye is going to be very interesting with atleast 4 teams having a chance to win it next year.
Gratz to Clayton!
C
Cthelites
Posts: 1,951
Feb 10, 2012 12:38am
Nace wins the rematch wow he is a very fun kid to watch. He has had some wild ones with the McDougals and now Boswell.
Did Knull wrestle?
Did Knull wrestle?
D
Dad4Sports
Posts: 1,779
Feb 10, 2012 12:45am
Yes.....good to see Tullius on the mat again before his career ended. He has a lot of work to do to have a shot to do anything in the post-season. Weight is an issue....think I heard he cut a bunch to get to where he was tonight.....with a ways to go. But at least he is back and he has a fighting chance. CW is off until sectionals....so he has to make the most out of every practice session.
Possible CW league contenders.....Calloway (152, 160?)....Lacey (220-285?....he beat both Kinzer and Jewell tonight) Maybe the AC kid at 220?
Possible CW league contenders.....Calloway (152, 160?)....Lacey (220-285?....he beat both Kinzer and Jewell tonight) Maybe the AC kid at 220?
B
bigdawg
Posts: 66
Feb 10, 2012 12:54am
what was calloways record at 152 &160? From what the coaches on here mentioned earlier, you have to have wrestled atleast 4 matches in any particular weight class to be eligable.Dad4Sports;1081833 wrote: Possible CW league contenders.....Calloway (152, 160?)....Lacey (220-285?....he beat both Kinzer and Jewell tonight) Maybe the AC kid at 220?
D
Dad4Sports
Posts: 1,779
Feb 10, 2012 6:38am
I don't know.....he bumped back and forth between the 2 weights. Last night he beat Farrell at 152, and then bumped to 160 and pinned Koehl. I assume he wrestled at least 4 matches at one of the 2 weight classes. I'm guessing he should be in the top 3...bigdawg;1081839 wrote:what was calloways record at 152 &160? From what the coaches on here mentioned earlier, you have to have wrestled atleast 4 matches in any particular weight class to be eligable.
bribacker51
Posts: 573
Feb 10, 2012 6:52am
He did not wrestle Koehl he was out due to injury in his first match that was his backup a freshman.Dad4Sports;1081868 wrote:I don't know.....he bumped back and forth between the 2 weights. Last night he beat Farrell at 152, and then bumped to 160 and pinned Koehl. I assume he wrestled at least 4 matches at one of the 2 weight classes. I'm guessing he should be in the top 3...
D
Dad4Sports
Posts: 1,779
Feb 10, 2012 7:27am
Thanks for the correction...did not realize that.bribacker51;1081870 wrote:He did not wrestle Koehl he was out due to injury in his first match that was his backup a freshman.
D
Dad4Sports
Posts: 1,779
Feb 10, 2012 7:30am
Amanda-Clearcreek 69, Fairfield Union 12
106: Parsley (AC) by forfeit. 11 3: Shannon (AC) by forfeit.120: Hoffmann (AC) pinned Collier 3:47. 126: Oehlers (FU) by forfeit. 13 2: Dilley (AC) pinned Newman :13. 138: Shumaker (AC) pinned McCormick 5:50. 145: Hoy (FU) pinned Johnson 5:59. 152: Horn (AC) pinned Meyer :46. 16 0: Fearnow (AC) dec. Hubble 7-2. 170: Tipton (AC) pinned Burge 1:05. 182: Minnard (AC) pinned Shuttleworth 1:41. 195: Chenetski (AC) pinned Hebb :53. 220: Genders (AC) pinned Ashbaugh :51.HVY: Luck (AC) by forfeit.
Amanda-Clearcreek 43, Circleville 27
106: Da.Cummings (CV) dec. Parsley 19-4; 113: Shannon (AC) dec. Meadows 12-1; 120: Kern (CV) dec. Hoffmann 3-2; 126: Fullen (CV) dec. Boyer 18-8; 132: Dilley (AC) by forfeit; 138: Holloway (CV) dec. Shumaker 8-4; 145: Garcia (CV) pinned Johnson 5:15; 152: Horn (AC) dec. Griffin 4-2 OT; 160: Davis (CV) pinned Fearnow 5:57; 170: Tipton (AC) pinned Weekley 1:25; 182: Minnard (AC) by forfeit; 195: Chenetski (AC) by forfeit; 220: Genders (AC) by forfeit; HVY: Luck (AC) by forfeit.
106: Parsley (AC) by forfeit. 11 3: Shannon (AC) by forfeit.120: Hoffmann (AC) pinned Collier 3:47. 126: Oehlers (FU) by forfeit. 13 2: Dilley (AC) pinned Newman :13. 138: Shumaker (AC) pinned McCormick 5:50. 145: Hoy (FU) pinned Johnson 5:59. 152: Horn (AC) pinned Meyer :46. 16 0: Fearnow (AC) dec. Hubble 7-2. 170: Tipton (AC) pinned Burge 1:05. 182: Minnard (AC) pinned Shuttleworth 1:41. 195: Chenetski (AC) pinned Hebb :53. 220: Genders (AC) pinned Ashbaugh :51.HVY: Luck (AC) by forfeit.
Amanda-Clearcreek 43, Circleville 27
106: Da.Cummings (CV) dec. Parsley 19-4; 113: Shannon (AC) dec. Meadows 12-1; 120: Kern (CV) dec. Hoffmann 3-2; 126: Fullen (CV) dec. Boyer 18-8; 132: Dilley (AC) by forfeit; 138: Holloway (CV) dec. Shumaker 8-4; 145: Garcia (CV) pinned Johnson 5:15; 152: Horn (AC) dec. Griffin 4-2 OT; 160: Davis (CV) pinned Fearnow 5:57; 170: Tipton (AC) pinned Weekley 1:25; 182: Minnard (AC) by forfeit; 195: Chenetski (AC) by forfeit; 220: Genders (AC) by forfeit; HVY: Luck (AC) by forfeit.
D
Dad4Sports
Posts: 1,779
Feb 10, 2012 7:40am
Anyone have these scores from last night?
LE @ BC
FU @ CV
LE @ BC
FU @ CV
T
theviking
Posts: 226
Feb 10, 2012 8:05am
Teays valley should have MSL Placers at
106 2nd
113 3rd
132 nace is 6-1 only lose to knull who only wrestled 3 match at 132 , nace beat Dilley AC, and Boswell CW
138 Dunn 1st
145 Luft 1st
182 Liedecker 1st
285 Sharp , 6-1 lost to HT carter but he has a lose also not sure to who
congrats to AC they wrestled hard all year and out lasted all other teams without inj and sickness.
106 2nd
113 3rd
132 nace is 6-1 only lose to knull who only wrestled 3 match at 132 , nace beat Dilley AC, and Boswell CW
138 Dunn 1st
145 Luft 1st
182 Liedecker 1st
285 Sharp , 6-1 lost to HT carter but he has a lose also not sure to who
congrats to AC they wrestled hard all year and out lasted all other teams without inj and sickness.
B
bigdawg
Posts: 66
Feb 10, 2012 10:34am
Without having all records in front of me this is what I’m thinking for the Aces for league honors.theviking;1081898 wrote:Teays valley should have MSL Placers at
106 2nd
113 3rd
132 nace is 6-1 only lose to knull who only wrestled 3 match at 132 , nace beat Dilley AC, and Boswell CW
138 Dunn 1st
145 Luft 1st
182 Liedecker 1st
285 Sharp , 6-1 lost to HT carter but he has a lose also not sure to who
congrats to AC they wrestled hard all year and out lasted all other teams without inj and sickness.
113 – Shannon – 2[SUP]nd[/SUP] or 3[SUP]rd
[/SUP]120 – Hoffman – he had some loses may bump in to 3[SUP]rd[/SUP] if other guys didn’t get the allotted 4 matches.
132 – Dilley – 2[SUP]nd[/SUP], lost to Nace beat Boswell.
145 – Johnson, not sure here possibly could get 3[SUP]rd[/SUP] again depends on the 4 match minimum. Although lost a tough one last night to CV kid, probably pushed him out of running.
152 – Horn – 1[SUP]st[/SUP]
170 – Tipton 1[SUP]st[/SUP]
182 – Minnard – possibly 3[SUP]rd[/SUP] I know had losses lost to HT & TV not sure if any more.
195 – Chenetski – 2[SUP]nd[/SUP] or 3rd loss to Crum in OT.
220 – Genders – ???
B
bman618
Posts: 151
Feb 10, 2012 1:56pm
LE beat Carroll 36-30. Didn't get complete info until this morning, so we'll have it in Saturday's paper.
Congrats to Amanda on winning its first MSL title in program history. Very solid team.
Also thought Circleville wrestled hard last night, and that dual was entertaining.
Good luck to all MSL-Buckeye teams in the postseason.
Congrats to Amanda on winning its first MSL title in program history. Very solid team.
Also thought Circleville wrestled hard last night, and that dual was entertaining.
Good luck to all MSL-Buckeye teams in the postseason.
D
Dad4Sports
Posts: 1,779
Feb 10, 2012 2:46pm
Final MSL Buckeye Standings
Amanda Clearcreek 7-0
Teays Valley 6-1
Hamilton Township 5-2
Canal Winchester 4-3
Circleville 3-4
Fairfield Union 2-5
Logan Elm 1-6
Bloom Carroll 0-7
Jan 19th
HT 36 CV 36 *HT wins on criteria
CW 42 FU 27
FU 36 LE 33
CW 36 LE 33
TV 54 BC 24
AC 61 BC 13
AC 38 TV 25
Jan 26th
TV 70 FU 10
CW 38 CV 21
CW 64 BC 22
CV 54 BC 21
HT 54 LE 21
AC 32 HT 26
AC 58 LE 24
Feb 2nd
AC 54 CW 15
HT 48 FU 18
HT 61 BC 11
FU 36 BC 18
TV 58 LE 15
TV 58 CV 12
CV over LE
Feb 9th
AC 43 CV 27
AC 69 FU 12
TV 48 CW 21
TV 40 HT 25
HT 32 CW 32 * HT wins on criteria
LE 36 BC 30
CV over FU
Amanda Clearcreek 7-0
Teays Valley 6-1
Hamilton Township 5-2
Canal Winchester 4-3
Circleville 3-4
Fairfield Union 2-5
Logan Elm 1-6
Bloom Carroll 0-7
Jan 19th
HT 36 CV 36 *HT wins on criteria
CW 42 FU 27
FU 36 LE 33
CW 36 LE 33
TV 54 BC 24
AC 61 BC 13
AC 38 TV 25
Jan 26th
TV 70 FU 10
CW 38 CV 21
CW 64 BC 22
CV 54 BC 21
HT 54 LE 21
AC 32 HT 26
AC 58 LE 24
Feb 2nd
AC 54 CW 15
HT 48 FU 18
HT 61 BC 11
FU 36 BC 18
TV 58 LE 15
TV 58 CV 12
CV over LE
Feb 9th
AC 43 CV 27
AC 69 FU 12
TV 48 CW 21
TV 40 HT 25
HT 32 CW 32 * HT wins on criteria
LE 36 BC 30
CV over FU
O
oldtimer1979
Posts: 76
Feb 10, 2012 5:52pm
Since Tullius wrestled at 160 vs. Teays last night, can he stay at 145 for Sectionals, or can only go downkennypowers;1081760 wrote:Nice to see Tullius back
to. 152?
C
Cthelites
Posts: 1,951
Feb 10, 2012 6:29pm
If he weighed in at 152-54 he would still be eligible. If he weighed in at 154.1 or more he forfeits 145.oldtimer1979;1082527 wrote:Since Tullius wrestled at 160 vs. Teays last night, can he stay at 145 for Sectionals, or can only go down
to. 152?
D
Dad4Sports
Posts: 1,779
Feb 10, 2012 7:57pm
He has not decided what weight he will be at in the post season. He told me last night he will either be at 138 or 145Cthelites;1082539 wrote:If he weighed in at 152-54 he would still be eligible. If he weighed in at 154.1 or more he forfeits 145.
cruiser_96
Posts: 7,536
Feb 10, 2012 8:40pm
Best of luck to the young no matter the weight class.
9
951123rd
Posts: 19
Feb 11, 2012 3:27pm
Calloway 6-0 at 160, only wrestled 152 one time and that was against TV. Lacey was either 4-0 or 5-0 at 220, but definitely had his 4 matches at 220. Pretty sure I read Jewell (HT) beat the AC wrestler, which would give Lacey first team. Calloway should be first team as well.Dad4Sports;1081833 wrote:Yes.....good to see Tullius on the mat again before his career ended. He has a lot of work to do to have a shot to do anything in the post-season. Weight is an issue....think I heard he cut a bunch to get to where he was tonight.....with a ways to go. But at least he is back and he has a fighting chance. CW is off until sectionals....so he has to make the most out of every practice session.
Possible CW league contenders.....Calloway (152, 160?)....Lacey (220-285?....he beat both Kinzer and Jewell tonight) Maybe the AC kid at 220?
USMCdevil2005
Posts: 950
Feb 12, 2012 5:35pm
How many state qualifiers will the msl have? I say 14
B
bigdawg
Posts: 66
Feb 12, 2012 8:01pm
You're probably right there in the middle of what would, could & will happen...I will say 12,but think we could get as many as 15-17 if things go their way.USMCdevil2005;1083896 wrote:How many state qualifiers will the msl have? I say 14