GOONx19;1048015 wrote:Hmm. I feel like I've been in games where flagrants were called, but I guess maybe I haven't. I never knew it was an automatic ejection.

All I have is the case book on me, or else I'd quote the rule for you. I may run to my car in a bit to get the rule book, to give you the verbiage verbatim.

If "flagrant" is not just a technical, but actually results in an ejection, then no more than 1 or 2 of the fouls were "flagrant". But that kid should have been ejected anyway, especially considering the continuous display of poor sportsmanship and intentional rough play.

thePITman;1048027 wrote:If "flagrant" is not just a technical, but actually results in an ejection, then no more than 1 or 2 of the fouls were "flagrant". But that kid should have been ejected anyway, especially considering the continuous display of poor sportsmanship and intentional rough play.

It is considered a "flagrant technical." And I would honestly consider two fouls flagrant technicals. Close-line and excessive blocking of shot, where he hit the kid in the face.