lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
Apr 28, 2012 2:04pm
LOL probably true but I'd rather have Benjamin than Toonthe_system;1156113 wrote:Phil Dawson could produce as many receptions as Massaquoi has.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Apr 28, 2012 2:10pm
I like the Benjamin pick. Guy is a burner, exactly what we need.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Apr 28, 2012 2:14pm
I don't mind these two picks today. Benjamin probably could have been taken a round or 2 later, but I won't complain.
JMJ is an ILB, so not surprised I had at least a little laugh at seeing that. but he is a versatile prospect so he'll eventually be able to play OLB..and we can only thank fucking god for that...because our OLB's suck ass.
JMJ is an ILB, so not surprised I had at least a little laugh at seeing that. but he is a versatile prospect so he'll eventually be able to play OLB..and we can only thank fucking god for that...because our OLB's suck ass.
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
Apr 28, 2012 2:28pm
Yeah he was drafted to be a good tackling OLB, no complaints there.SportsAndLady;1156124 wrote:I don't mind these two picks today. Benjamin probably could have been taken a round or 2 later, but I won't complain.
JMJ is an ILB, so not surprised I had at least a little laugh at seeing that. but he is a versatile prospect so he'll eventually be able to play OLB..and we can only thank ****ing god for that...because our OLB's suck ass.
B
buckeyes_woowee
Posts: 512
Apr 28, 2012 2:33pm
Some guys I would like to snag in the draft still are Minnifield, Markelle Martin, Ryan Lindley and Marvin McNutt.
Dr. KnOiTaLL
Posts: 2,682
Apr 28, 2012 2:36pm
Best available wide receivers below:
Dr. KnOiTaLL
Posts: 2,682
Apr 28, 2012 2:43pm
I'd be ecstatic if we grabbed either of the Marv(in)'s. I think they both had some potential to be solid WR's in the NFL with a little polishing.
Z
zach24oz
Posts: 598
Apr 28, 2012 3:02pm
Marvin Jones is a little faster..about 4.46 and McNutt is bigger at 6-4 216 but I think he has better hands. We'll see.
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
Apr 28, 2012 3:02pm
Another guard, nice!
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
Apr 28, 2012 3:04pm
B
buckeyes_woowee
Posts: 512
Apr 28, 2012 3:05pm
he is huge. 6'7
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
Apr 28, 2012 3:07pm
I love the pick--at 6'7" he can play both inside and outside.
IggyPride00
Posts: 6,482
Apr 28, 2012 3:09pm
The browns front office must have thought very little of McCoy if you think about it.
We had what was largely considered to be one of the worst receiver groups in the NFL last year.
We didn't get any in free agency, and made no effort to draft one in the top 100.
That basically tells you they think the group we had wasn't that bad, and that it was Colt's fault they sucked. Clearly they think this group will be drastically improved with Weeden throwing them the ball, otherwise they would have drafted one with the 2/3 round pick.
We had what was largely considered to be one of the worst receiver groups in the NFL last year.
We didn't get any in free agency, and made no effort to draft one in the top 100.
That basically tells you they think the group we had wasn't that bad, and that it was Colt's fault they sucked. Clearly they think this group will be drastically improved with Weeden throwing them the ball, otherwise they would have drafted one with the 2/3 round pick.
derek bomar
Posts: 3,722
Apr 28, 2012 3:10pm
like this pick. now draft another WR. Btw, the Steelers n Bengals are having great drafts.
Dr. KnOiTaLL
Posts: 2,682
Apr 28, 2012 3:11pm
They're saying he may be moved to tackle as well at that size. Could you imagine Colt McCoy trying to see behind the lineman if he was at guard...buckeyes_woowee;1156143 wrote:he is huge. 6'7
Z
zach24oz
Posts: 598
Apr 28, 2012 3:13pm
http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/2012/04/cleveland_browns_take_colorado.html
Says he could've went anywhere from late 1st-3rd, so I guess it's a good pick. With the Browns, you can never have enough OL...so is this competetion between him and Schwartz for RT?
Says he could've went anywhere from late 1st-3rd, so I guess it's a good pick. With the Browns, you can never have enough OL...so is this competetion between him and Schwartz for RT?
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
Apr 28, 2012 3:14pm
IggyPride00;1156146 wrote:The browns front office must have thought very little of McCoy if you think about it.
We had what was largely considered to be one of the worst receiver groups in the NFL last year.
We didn't get any in free agency, and made no effort to draft one in the top 100.
That basically tells you they think the group we had wasn't that bad, and that it was Colt's fault they sucked. Clearly they think this group will be drastically improved with Weeden throwing them the ball, otherwise they would have drafted one with the 2/3 round pick.
Led the league in drops....not the qb. They really shit the bed so far....hopefully colt is traded for some sort of receiver
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
Apr 28, 2012 3:16pm
IggyPride00
Posts: 6,482
Apr 28, 2012 3:16pm
I am not saying I agree with it, but what else can really be drawn from that?Led the league in drops....not the qb.
They clearly think this group is not the problem since they haven't done anything to help it. The only conclusion to draw is that they think McCoy was the problem, and that Weeden will fix it.
B
buckeyes_woowee
Posts: 512
Apr 28, 2012 3:17pm
I'm not sure if McCoy can see over a high school line.Dr. KnOiTaLL;1156149 wrote:They're saying he may be moved to tackle as well at that size. Could you imagine Colt McCoy trying to see behind the lineman if he was at guard...
B
buckeyes_woowee
Posts: 512
Apr 28, 2012 3:20pm
Browns are picking guys with a lot of playing experience. Tells me they are eager to win now
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Apr 28, 2012 3:26pm
SMH... Once again, nobody said McCoy was the answer, nobody said the front office believed he was the guy.IggyPride00;1156146 wrote:The browns front office must have thought very little of McCoy if you think about it.
We had what was largely considered to be one of the worst receiver groups in the NFL last year.
We didn't get any in free agency, and made no effort to draft one in the top 100.
That basically tells you they think the group we had wasn't that bad, and that it was Colt's fault they sucked. Clearly they think this group will be drastically improved with Weeden throwing them the ball, otherwise they would have drafted one with the 2/3 round pick.
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Apr 28, 2012 3:28pm
iggy just rambles on about nothing.
hoops23
Posts: 15,696
Apr 28, 2012 3:35pm
There is no gray area with drops though. If a ball is under thrown or behind the WR and they get a hand on it but don't make the catch, isn't that counted as a drop?wes_mantooth;1156151 wrote:Led the league in drops....not the qb. They really shit the bed so far....hopefully colt is traded for some sort of receiver
I know I've said it multiple times, but whatever... I like Little's potential. I think the people giving up on him are foolish.
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Apr 28, 2012 3:36pm
Not giving up on Little, as you can definitely improve you catching ability, however a lot of his drops were his fault.hoops23;1156163 wrote:There is no gray area with drops though. If a ball is under thrown or behind the WR and they get a hand on it but don't make the catch, isn't that counted as a drop?
I know I've said it multiple times, but whatever... I like Little's potential. I think the people giving up on him are foolish.