2012 Cleveland Browns thread: AKA Pat Shurmur Memorial thread

Home Archive Pro Sports 2012 Cleveland Browns thread: AKA Pat Shurmur Memorial thread
SportsAndLady's avatar

SportsAndLady

Senior Member

35,632 posts
Apr 27, 2012 9:25 PM
Dr. KnOiTaLL;1155650 wrote:Dude, you aren't even a Browns fan...
Yes I am...just saying I don't want to be "in the playoff hunt" this year, I want to either be a) 2-14 with the #1 overall pick or b) 14-2 and SB contenders. Sorry if you don't agree
Apr 27, 2012 9:25pm
Pick6's avatar

Pick6

A USA American

14,946 posts
Apr 27, 2012 9:26 PM
SportsAndLady;1155661 wrote:Yes I am...just saying I don't want to be "in the playoff hunt" this year, I want to either be a) 2-14 with the #1 overall pick or b) 14-2 and SB contenders. Sorry if you don't agree
eh, I'd be ecstatic 7-9, 8-8. This isnt the NBA. You don't have to suck in order to get better.
Apr 27, 2012 9:26pm
Iliketurtles's avatar

Iliketurtles

Senior Member

8,191 posts
Apr 27, 2012 9:26 PM
Not a bad trade for the Browns they are some WRs left but none of them garnered an early pick in the 3rd round.
Apr 27, 2012 9:26pm
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Apr 27, 2012 9:28 PM
Iliketurtles;1155663 wrote:Not a bad trade for the Browns they are some WRs left but none of them garnered an early pick in the 3rd round.
As soon as Randle came off the board they traded down. They tried to move up into the 2nd (trade with Eagles) that fell through.
Apr 27, 2012 9:28pm
Dr. KnOiTaLL's avatar

Dr. KnOiTaLL

Trust me, I'm a doctor!

2,682 posts
Apr 27, 2012 9:28 PM
SportsAndLady;1155661 wrote:Yes I am...just saying I don't want to be "in the playoff hunt" this year, I want to either be a) 2-14 with the #1 overall pick or b) 14-2 and SB contenders. Sorry if you don't agree
Oh... so you're a fair weather fan? Even better...
Apr 27, 2012 9:28pm
Dr. KnOiTaLL's avatar

Dr. KnOiTaLL

Trust me, I'm a doctor!

2,682 posts
Apr 27, 2012 9:28 PM
There goes Posey
Apr 27, 2012 9:28pm
SportsAndLady's avatar

SportsAndLady

Senior Member

35,632 posts
Apr 27, 2012 9:28 PM
Pick6;1155662 wrote:eh, I'd be ecstatic 7-9, 8-8. This isnt the NBA. You don't have to suck in order to get better.
Normally I agree..but I think Weeden sucks, so I want them to be 2-14 so they can grab the top QB in 2013 (either that or a really good record, obviously)

My worst case scenario for this team is around .500
Apr 27, 2012 9:28pm
S

Sonofanump

Apr 27, 2012 9:29 PM
SportsAndLady;1155661 wrote:Yes I am...just saying I don't want to be "in the playoff hunt" this year, I want to either be a) 2-14 with the #1 overall pick or b) 14-2 and SB contenders. Sorry if you don't agree
What team in NFL history has gone that bad to SB contender in one year?
Apr 27, 2012 9:29pm
SportsAndLady's avatar

SportsAndLady

Senior Member

35,632 posts
Apr 27, 2012 9:29 PM
Dr. KnOiTaLL;1155666 wrote:Oh... so you're a fair weather fan? Even better...
What the fuck are you talking about
Apr 27, 2012 9:29pm
SportsAndLady's avatar

SportsAndLady

Senior Member

35,632 posts
Apr 27, 2012 9:30 PM
Sonofanump;1155672 wrote:What team in NFL history has gone that bad to SB contender?
???

Where in my scenario are we going from 2-14 to 14-2?
Apr 27, 2012 9:30pm
lhslep134's avatar

lhslep134

why so serious?

9,774 posts
Apr 27, 2012 9:30 PM
SportsAndLady;1155669 wrote: My worst case scenario for this team is around .500
Your worst case scenario is marked improvement from last year, getting 8 wins against the 3rd toughest schedule in the league with a rookie RB and rookie QB?

That's retarded.
Apr 27, 2012 9:30pm
Dr. KnOiTaLL's avatar

Dr. KnOiTaLL

Trust me, I'm a doctor!

2,682 posts
Apr 27, 2012 9:31 PM
hahaha... Jacksonville spent a 3rd rounder on a punter!
Apr 27, 2012 9:31pm
Pick6's avatar

Pick6

A USA American

14,946 posts
Apr 27, 2012 9:31 PM
SportsAndLady;1155669 wrote:Normally I agree..but I think Weeden sucks, so I want them to be 2-14 so they can grab the top QB in 2013 (either that or a really good record, obviously)

My worst case scenario for this team is around .500
regardless of how much he may or may not suck, I dont see them giving up on him after one year. If they do go 2-14 or whatever next year, maybe they will finally bite the bullet and take a WR high.
Apr 27, 2012 9:31pm
S

Sonofanump

Apr 27, 2012 9:32 PM
SportsAndLady;1155675 wrote:???

Where in my scenario are we going from 2-14 to 14-2?
Your statement had no middle ground or progression mentioned.
Apr 27, 2012 9:32pm
hoops23's avatar

hoops23

Senior Member

15,696 posts
Apr 27, 2012 9:32 PM
SportsAndLady;1155669 wrote:Normally I agree..but I think Weeden sucks, so I want them to be 2-14 so they can grab the top QB in 2013 (either that or a really good record, obviously)

My worst case scenario for this team is around .500
So because you THINK Weeden sucks, you WANT the Browns to suck? Makes sense..

Like I said, I'm not big on the Weeden pick, but I've grown on it. I hope he succeeds because I want the Browns to do well.
Apr 27, 2012 9:32pm
T

the_system

Senior Member

465 posts
Apr 27, 2012 9:32 PM
Best player on the board right now might be Alfonzo Dennard CB Nebraska. With his recent legal problem, he could end up being a steal.
Apr 27, 2012 9:32pm
wes_mantooth's avatar

wes_mantooth

Tomfoolery & shenanigans

17,977 posts
Apr 27, 2012 9:32 PM
Dr. KnOiTaLL;1155677 wrote:hahaha... Jacksonville spent a 3rd rounder on a punter!

Most important player in the game.

/Tressel'd
Apr 27, 2012 9:32pm
Pick6's avatar

Pick6

A USA American

14,946 posts
Apr 27, 2012 9:33 PM
sigh...Posey gone. I wonder if Houston told the Browns they weren't going to take him? Lol.
Apr 27, 2012 9:33pm
SportsAndLady's avatar

SportsAndLady

Senior Member

35,632 posts
Apr 27, 2012 9:33 PM
lhslep134;1155676 wrote:Your worst case scenario is marked improvement from last year, getting 8 wins against the 3rd toughest schedule in the league with a rookie RB and rookie QB?

That's retarded.
Yes because you can't win shit in the NFL without a super star QB and Weeden, imo, is not and will never be that.

They go 8-8 this year, they're gonna go 8-8 the next year..and the next year. And the next year.

You go 2-14, you get your Matt Barkley or Keith Price or whoever the RG3 is next year...then you see "marked improvement" and can be happy w/ that.
Apr 27, 2012 9:33pm
SMITTEMS's avatar

SMITTEMS

Senior Member

309 posts
Apr 27, 2012 9:33 PM
YES!!! PUNTER!!!
Apr 27, 2012 9:33pm
Dr. KnOiTaLL's avatar

Dr. KnOiTaLL

Trust me, I'm a doctor!

2,682 posts
Apr 27, 2012 9:34 PM
wes_mantooth;1155684 wrote:Most important player in the game.

/Tressel'd
Now THAT would tick me off! spending a 3rd rounder on a P
Apr 27, 2012 9:34pm
wes_mantooth's avatar

wes_mantooth

Tomfoolery & shenanigans

17,977 posts
Apr 27, 2012 9:35 PM
Lol....where did we draft the long snapper that one year? That was great for the lulz
Apr 27, 2012 9:35pm
Mr Miyagi's avatar

Mr Miyagi

wax on, wax off

1,211 posts
Apr 27, 2012 9:36 PM
SportsAndLady;1155686 wrote:Yes because you can't win shit in the NFL without a super star QB and Weeden, imo, is not and will never be that.

They go 8-8 this year, they're gonna go 8-8 the next year..and the next year. And the next year.

You go 2-14, you get your Matt Barkley or Keith Price or whoever the RG3 is next year...then you see "marked improvement" and can be happy w/ that.
"If you guys don't suck, go 2-14 and pick Barkley, we will" #BillBelichick
Apr 27, 2012 9:36pm
Mulva's avatar

Mulva

Senior Member

13,650 posts
Apr 27, 2012 9:36 PM
BR1986FB;1155660 wrote:Denver's 4th (# 120)...got back the same area as the Julio Jones pick traded for T-Rich
In addition to 87?
Apr 27, 2012 9:36pm
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Apr 27, 2012 9:36 PM
wes_mantooth;1155692 wrote:Lol....where did we draft the long snapper that one year? That was great for the lulz
Pontbriand, 5th rounder, I believe.

Al Davis took Janikowski with a 1st, I think
Apr 27, 2012 9:36pm