Ohio Chatter
Ohio Chatter

Forums

All Threads Serious Business Sports Politics Archive Pick 'ems Wordio
Log In Create Account

2012 Cleveland Browns thread: AKA Pat Shurmur Memorial thread

Home ▸ Archive ▸ Pro Sports ▸ 2012 Cleveland Browns thread: AKA Pat Shurmur Memorial thread
DeyDurkie5's avatar

DeyDurkie5

Senior Member

11,324 posts
Apr 15, 2012 9:15 PM
Mr Miyagi;1144816 wrote:Everyone should remember this argument for next year when we have the first pick and people want Barkley. Name a franchise QB from USC. Sanchez ? Leinart? Anybody?
jesus. are you guys retarded? We aren't saying IT"S THE ONLY REASON, we are just saying it adds to the pick being selected that high as a no no. How hard is that to comprehend.
Apr 15, 2012 9:15pm
lhslep134's avatar

lhslep134

why so serious?

9,774 posts
Apr 15, 2012 9:23 PM
Conference affiliation to me normally has no bearing. But when a conference has been this bad at producing legitimate franchise quarterbacks for a decade now, it's a negative. It's not a positive factor for any other QB, ie no conference is particularly better than another, but the Big 12 is notably bad because it is built around things that QBs simply don't see in the league: a close to no huddle offense the whole time, 55 snaps from shotgun, extremely porous defenses.

I can't help that I find those things negative when considering a QB. As Durkie said, it's not a determinative factor, but to us, it's a factor nonetheless.
Apr 15, 2012 9:23pm
Crimson streak's avatar

Crimson streak

Senior Member

9,002 posts
Apr 15, 2012 9:29 PM
SportsAndLady;1144812 wrote:SMH you are LITERALLY retarded.

Now onto personal attacks because you have nothing. The conferences defenses have absolutely no affect on how a player will succeed in the nfl. It's a bullshit excuse and retarded. If a guy can play he can. Like skyhook said there are a lot of very good defensive players in the nfl from the big 12. So they obviously played nfl talent. The schemes they run in the big 12 make it an offense league just like the big 10 is a defensive league.
Apr 15, 2012 9:29pm
SportsAndLady's avatar

SportsAndLady

Senior Member

35,632 posts
Apr 15, 2012 9:30 PM
Crimson streak;1144832 wrote:Now onto personal attacks because you have nothing. The conferences defenses have absolutely no affect on how a player will succeed in the nfl. It's a bullshit excuse and retarded. If a guy can play he can. Like skyhook said there are a lot of very good defensive players in the nfl from the big 12. So they obviously played nfl talent. The schemes they run in the big 12 make it an offense league just like the big 10 is a defensive league.
You've been absolutely owned on this topic, and you're gonna tell me I have nothing?

L
O
L
Apr 15, 2012 9:30pm
Crimson streak's avatar

Crimson streak

Senior Member

9,002 posts
Apr 15, 2012 9:43 PM
SportsAndLady;1144837 wrote:You've been absolutely owned on this topic, and you're gonna tell me I have nothing?

L
O
L

How have I been owned because you say so? Honestly your logic is ficking retarded. A qb played in the big 12 so he won't be good in the nfl. That's the dumbest thing I have ever heard honestly. So continue to complain about how the browns are looking at a big 12 qb and how terrible he will be because I'm done with this topic. I have my opinion you have yours it's as simple as that.
Apr 15, 2012 9:43pm
DeyDurkie5's avatar

DeyDurkie5

Senior Member

11,324 posts
Apr 15, 2012 9:51 PM
Crimson streak;1144846 wrote:How have I been owned because you say so? Honestly your logic is ficking retarded. A qb played in the big 12 so he won't be good in the nfl. That's the dumbest thing I have ever heard honestly. So continue to complain about how the browns are looking at a big 12 qb and how terrible he will be because I'm done with this topic. I have my opinion you have yours it's as simple as that.
once again. for the millionth time. We aren't saying that it's the ONLY REASON he shouldn't get drafted. It's just a factor into the debate on how high he should be drafted. Are you that fucking retarded? Seriously, you are just doing this to argue. Because if you are not, then you literally have downs, kindly.
Apr 15, 2012 9:51pm
SportsAndLady's avatar

SportsAndLady

Senior Member

35,632 posts
Apr 15, 2012 9:55 PM
Yeah C Streak is just stupid, that's all I can really think of
Apr 15, 2012 9:55pm
lhslep134's avatar

lhslep134

why so serious?

9,774 posts
Apr 15, 2012 9:57 PM
Crimson streak;1144846 wrote: That's the dumbest thing I have ever heard honestly..
Coming from the person who said Tom Brady was horrible in college and nothing was expected of #1 pick Sam Bradford?

Irony at it's finest.
Apr 15, 2012 9:57pm
Crimson streak's avatar

Crimson streak

Senior Member

9,002 posts
Apr 15, 2012 10:05 PM
Being big ten honorable mention is definitely average. And of course Bradford had expectations it was all the other qb's on your list.

I'm saying the big 12 bullshit should have absolutely no pull at all in drafting someone not the only factor. I worded it wrong a little bit. Once again it should have no factor at all.
Apr 15, 2012 10:05pm
DeyDurkie5's avatar

DeyDurkie5

Senior Member

11,324 posts
Apr 15, 2012 10:19 PM
let's just drop this. crimson is obviously retarded when it comes to this.
Apr 15, 2012 10:19pm
Crimson streak's avatar

Crimson streak

Senior Member

9,002 posts
Apr 15, 2012 10:32 PM
You don't get what I'm saying. I'm saying you can have other factors to why he can't succeed but because of the big 12 defenses should not be a factor at all
Apr 15, 2012 10:32pm
hoops23's avatar

hoops23

Senior Member

15,696 posts
Apr 15, 2012 10:34 PM
The fact that he'll be 29 by week 4 is a complete turn off for me. Especially with anything in the top 37
Apr 15, 2012 10:34pm
Commander of Awesome's avatar

Commander of Awesome

Senior Pwner

23,151 posts
Apr 15, 2012 10:39 PM
DeyDurkie5;1144889 wrote:crimson is obviously retarded when it comes to this.
This is very mean.
Apr 15, 2012 10:39pm
wes_mantooth's avatar

wes_mantooth

Tomfoolery & shenanigans

17,977 posts
Apr 15, 2012 10:40 PM
hoops23;1144897 wrote:The fact that he'll be 29 by week 4 is a complete turn off for me. Especially with anything in the top 37
Yeah, I feel the same, but I do understand the argument that if he gives you 6 good years...that is better than anything we have had since they came back. I am just not sold on him or Tannehill...no matter what the age or experience that they have.
Apr 15, 2012 10:40pm
DeyDurkie5's avatar

DeyDurkie5

Senior Member

11,324 posts
Apr 15, 2012 10:48 PM
Crimson streak;1144896 wrote:You don't get what I'm saying. I'm saying you can have other factors to why he can't succeed but because of the big 12 defenses should not be a factor at all
When almost all of their top qb's coming of the division have failed/not lived up to the hype, yes you can take it into account. The type of offense ran in that league is not NFL translatable.
Apr 15, 2012 10:48pm
Crimson streak's avatar

Crimson streak

Senior Member

9,002 posts
Apr 15, 2012 11:06 PM
DeyDurkie5;1144907 wrote:When almost all of their top qb's coming of the division have failed/not lived up to the hype, yes you can take it into account. The type of offense ran in that league is not NFL translatable.

But what I'm saying Is there has only been 2 prototypical nfl qb's to come from the big 12 in Bradford and gabbert and I would gabbert is questionable because he a retard. So you really can't judge the conference for its qb's. I agree I don't want weedon. He's old and wouldn't be a good fit. I kind of worded my posts wrong so you probably didn't understand what I was trying to say
Apr 15, 2012 11:06pm
B

buckeyes_woowee

Senior Member

512 posts
Apr 15, 2012 11:37 PM
Josh Freeman is from the Big 12 as well. Not saying that he is elite but has shown some promise. Weeden is going to go in the first round and I don't think it will be to the Browns.
Apr 15, 2012 11:37pm
Crimson streak's avatar

Crimson streak

Senior Member

9,002 posts
Apr 15, 2012 11:45 PM
That's almost like saying we should draft cousins because big ten qb's have been successful over say tannehill. IMO they both suck and I wouldn't want either but if I had to take one it would be tannehill.
Apr 15, 2012 11:45pm
ohiobucks1's avatar

ohiobucks1

USA American

4,915 posts
Apr 16, 2012 12:15 AM
STFU Crimson.


Back to the topic, I hope the Browns get Miami to trade with them, trade down and get extra first round pick
Apr 16, 2012 12:15am
Pick6's avatar

Pick6

A USA American

14,946 posts
Apr 16, 2012 12:21 AM
Crimson streak;1144952 wrote:That's almost like saying we should draft cousins because big ten qb's have been successful over say tannehill. IMO they both suck and I wouldn't want either but if I had to take one it would be tannehill.
tannehill at 4 is not as good of a pick as cousins in say... the 4th or 5th. Too much value at that high of a pick to risk on somebody who has been a quarterback for all of one season in college.
Apr 16, 2012 12:21am
Y-Town Steelhound's avatar

Y-Town Steelhound

Underrated

1,388 posts
Apr 16, 2012 12:22 AM
Crimson streak;1144952 wrote:That's almost like saying we should draft cousins because big ten qb's have been successful over say tannehill. IMO they both suck and I wouldn't want either but if I had to take one it would be tannehill.
Cousins is going to be the surprise in this year's draft. His floor IMO is at least an excellent backup which is pretty good for a guy who's most likely gonna be a 5th round pick.

He's pretty much a stronger armed Colt McCoy.
Apr 16, 2012 12:22am
DeyDurkie5's avatar

DeyDurkie5

Senior Member

11,324 posts
Apr 16, 2012 12:24 AM
crimson is literally retarded. I'm sorry, but the way he has been spouting off he just isn't making sense. Let's get back to the real convo.

I do love how BR posts on this site, but hasn't posted on this thread. Just like when we got into an argument, he defriended me on facebook. Now, he gets into one argument where people are "making fun of him" and he doesn't post on the thread. Funny
Apr 16, 2012 12:24am
dazedconfused's avatar

dazedconfused

Senior Member

2,662 posts
Apr 16, 2012 2:58 AM
DeyDurkie5;1144907 wrote:When almost all of their top qb's coming of the division have failed/not lived up to the hype, yes you can take it into account. The type of offense ran in that league is not NFL translatable.
agreed. the spread is just terrible for developing qbs for success in the nfl. tannehill is a different story because of the wco but he has own faults to deal with - he'll still go about 25 spots higher than he should
Apr 16, 2012 2:58am
hoops23's avatar

hoops23

Senior Member

15,696 posts
Apr 16, 2012 3:06 AM
DeyDurkie5;1144971 wrote:crimson is literally retarded. I'm sorry, but the way he has been spouting off he just isn't making sense. Let's get back to the real convo.

I do love how BR posts on this site, but hasn't posted on this thread. Just like when we got into an argument, he defriended me on facebook. Now, he gets into one argument where people are "making fun of him" and he doesn't post on the thread. Funny
I've noticed when BR gets into spouts he does that. He's left the site a couple of times in the past after he got into debates.

I don't know if he takes it personal or what, but I know nobody here actually tries to make anything personal. It's an internet message board. You have several people on here discussing the same topics, some will agree, some will not. Take it for what it is. A discussion.
Apr 16, 2012 3:06am
like_that's avatar

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

26,625 posts
Apr 16, 2012 7:18 AM
BR has been posting on the Yappi Cleveland Browns thread lol. I like BR, I don't think he likes me as a poster any more though, because we haven't seen quite eye to eye this off season, but as Hoops says, nothing personal here.. at least on this end.
Apr 16, 2012 7:18am