2012 Cleveland Browns thread: AKA Pat Shurmur Memorial thread

Home Archive Pro Sports 2012 Cleveland Browns thread: AKA Pat Shurmur Memorial thread
Commander of Awesome's avatar

Commander of Awesome

Senior Pwner

23,151 posts
Apr 11, 2012 1:34 PM
I'd be ok with taking a flyer on him, late 5th on. Why the fuck not?
Apr 11, 2012 1:34pm
Pick6's avatar

Pick6

A USA American

14,946 posts
Apr 11, 2012 1:40 PM
like_that;1141685 wrote:I am all for this. This is the beauty of having 13 picks, you can take a flier on a guy like him in the later rounds.

http://www.espncleveland.com/common/more.php?m=49&post_id=883
would love it. Nothing wrong with spending a late pick on a project that has shown huge potential.
Apr 11, 2012 1:40pm
like_that's avatar

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

26,625 posts
Apr 11, 2012 1:47 PM
Commander of Awesome;1141687 wrote:I'd be ok with taking a flyer on him, late 5th on. Why the fuck not?
Pick6;1141697 wrote:would love it. Nothing wrong with spending a late pick on a project that has shown huge potential.
I wonder how many other teams are thinking the same thing though.
Apr 11, 2012 1:47pm
Dr. KnOiTaLL's avatar

Dr. KnOiTaLL

Trust me, I'm a doctor!

2,682 posts
Apr 11, 2012 2:12 PM
like_that;1141703 wrote:I wonder how many other teams are thinking the same thing though.
This... I feel like we are always losing situations like these. I'd be all for it, though. We need a little rage and aggression.
Apr 11, 2012 2:12pm
S

Sonofanump

Apr 11, 2012 3:30 PM
I suggested Kahlil a few months ago on here and was criticized by most stating that it was not wise to take a RT with the #4 overall pick.
Apr 11, 2012 3:30pm
Commander of Awesome's avatar

Commander of Awesome

Senior Pwner

23,151 posts
Apr 11, 2012 3:44 PM
Sonofanump;1141785 wrote:I suggested Kahlil a few months ago on here and was criticized by most stating that it was not wise to take a RT with the #4 overall pick.
It's not. but I wouldnd QQ about it.
Apr 11, 2012 3:44pm
like_that's avatar

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

26,625 posts
Apr 11, 2012 3:57 PM
Commander of Awesome;1141808 wrote:It's not. but I wouldnd QQ about it.
+1. The people who QQ about are just looking for the sexy pick. I remember a lot of people QQing when the Browns drafted JT (along with other idiots making fun of the browns for that pick). That pick turned out alright.
Apr 11, 2012 3:57pm
Iliketurtles's avatar

Iliketurtles

Senior Member

8,191 posts
Apr 11, 2012 4:05 PM
like_that;1141685 wrote:I am all for this. This is the beauty of having 13 picks, you can take a flier on a guy like him in the later rounds.

http://www.espncleveland.com/common/more.php?m=49&post_id=883
Yeah he could turn out to be a beast. Im sure there are many who are waiting for him to fall. Another guy who I think would be great to get in the later rounds would be Kellen Moore(Probably like 6th or 7th round with a comp pick).
Apr 11, 2012 4:05pm
shook_17's avatar

shook_17

Senior Member

3,023 posts
Apr 11, 2012 4:53 PM
http://espn.go.com/blog/afcnorth

looks like keith rivers was traded from the bengals for a 5th rounder. i wish the browns would have moved on him. if he stays healthy the dude is a fucking stud.
Apr 11, 2012 4:53pm
wes_mantooth's avatar

wes_mantooth

Tomfoolery & shenanigans

17,977 posts
Apr 11, 2012 5:08 PM
Sonofanump;1141785 wrote:I suggested Kahlil a few months ago on here and was criticized by most stating that it was not wise to take a RT with the #4 overall pick.

My only gripe is that I wonder if that is too high for a right tackle. If he was going to stay on the blind side....I would love it
Apr 11, 2012 5:08pm
Dr. KnOiTaLL's avatar

Dr. KnOiTaLL

Trust me, I'm a doctor!

2,682 posts
Apr 11, 2012 5:10 PM
shook_17;1141855 wrote:http://espn.go.com/blog/afcnorth

looks like keith rivers was traded from the bengals for a 5th rounder. i wish the browns would have moved on him. if he stays healthy the dude is a ****ing stud.
I doubt the Bengals would have been willing to deal within the division...
Apr 11, 2012 5:10pm
like_that's avatar

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

26,625 posts
Apr 11, 2012 5:12 PM
shook_17;1141855 wrote:http://espn.go.com/blog/afcnorth

looks like keith rivers was traded from the bengals for a 5th rounder. i wish the browns would have moved on him. if he stays healthy the dude is a fucking stud.
The price tag would have been much higher if the Browns went after him. If you trade within the division, you look to rape the other team.
Apr 11, 2012 5:12pm
like_that's avatar

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

26,625 posts
Apr 11, 2012 5:14 PM
wes_mantooth;1141864 wrote:My only gripe is that I wonder if that is too high for a right tackle. If he was going to stay on the blind side....I would love it
Would it make you feel better ff JT agreed to allow Kalil play LT for one play per game?
Apr 11, 2012 5:14pm
DeyDurkie5's avatar

DeyDurkie5

Senior Member

11,324 posts
Apr 11, 2012 5:21 PM
Sonofanump;1141785 wrote:I suggested Kahlil a few months ago on here and was criticized by most stating that it was not wise to take a RT with the #4 overall pick.
Yeah, you suggested it a few months ago. At that time, it was a forgone conclusion we were trading up for a QB. Quit being a bitch.
Apr 11, 2012 5:21pm
Dr. KnOiTaLL's avatar

Dr. KnOiTaLL

Trust me, I'm a doctor!

2,682 posts
Apr 11, 2012 5:35 PM
I love how mock drafts still have the Browns taking Tannehill... In fact, one recently have the Browns TRADING UP to #3 in order to take Tannehill. It just goes to show that these morons writing articles know just as little as any of us. What a joke.
Apr 11, 2012 5:35pm
like_that's avatar

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

26,625 posts
Apr 11, 2012 5:42 PM
Dr. KnOiTaLL;1141886 wrote:I love how mock drafts still have the Browns taking Tannehill... In fact, one recently have the Browns TRADING UP to #3 in order to take Tannehill. It just goes to show that these morons writing articles know just as little as any of us. What a joke.
I think in the past these guys would be somewhat accurate guessing what the Browns draft, but H&H keep everything secret, which I like.
Apr 11, 2012 5:42pm
wes_mantooth's avatar

wes_mantooth

Tomfoolery & shenanigans

17,977 posts
Apr 11, 2012 5:43 PM
like_that;1141871 wrote:Would it make you feel better ff JT agreed to allow Kalil play LT for one play per game?
yes.
Apr 11, 2012 5:43pm
S

Sonofanump

Apr 11, 2012 5:48 PM
DeyDurkie5;1141879 wrote:Yeah, you suggested it a few months ago. At that time, it was a forgone conclusion we were trading up for a QB. Quit being a bitch.
You apparently forgot to inform Dan Snyder of your forgone conclusion.
Apr 11, 2012 5:48pm
OQB's avatar

OQB

Senior Member

6,679 posts
Apr 11, 2012 5:48 PM
Dr. KnOiTaLL;1141886 wrote:I love how mock drafts still have the Browns taking Tannehill... In fact, one recently have the Browns TRADING UP to #3 in order to take Tannehill. It just goes to show that these morons writing articles know just as little as any of us. What a joke.

The sad thing is those guys are getting PAID to to do this...we just come on a free forum and speak our mind and predictions....smh!
Apr 11, 2012 5:48pm
DeyDurkie5's avatar

DeyDurkie5

Senior Member

11,324 posts
Apr 11, 2012 5:50 PM
Sonofanump;1141900 wrote:You apparently forgot to inform Dan Snyder of your forgone conclusion.
yeah, you didnt' understand. It's cool!
Apr 11, 2012 5:50pm
jpake1's avatar

jpake1

Senior Member

2,389 posts
Apr 11, 2012 5:51 PM
If I'm the Browns I take Richardson and don't think twice about it. Tannehill isn't even a thought. He hasn't done jack to warrant that high of a pick. He's the type of player that gets people fired. I stay away from Claiborne as well. I'd NEVER take a CB that high. I also have concerns about him. Good player, I just don't know how good he is when he isn't playing along side another stud. Certainly a first rounder, I just highly question the value in terms of being a top 5, or even top 10.
Apr 11, 2012 5:51pm
Mulva's avatar

Mulva

Senior Member

13,650 posts
Apr 11, 2012 5:52 PM
Pick6;1141668 wrote:Are the Bucs really that interested in Richardson?? They have Blount, who seems to be working out pretty good for them. Just seems like they have bigger needs..like Clariborne
Blount is dumb. He can't pick up a blitz and he can't catch. He's a 2-down back at best, and his numbers were pretty average last year too.
Apr 11, 2012 5:52pm
jpake1's avatar

jpake1

Senior Member

2,389 posts
Apr 11, 2012 5:54 PM
Yeah Blunt is very limited. It only gets worse the more tape their is on him as well. He'll be lucky to have a Michael Bush type career going forward. He might have a year or two is the Bucs don't take Rich.
Apr 11, 2012 5:54pm
wes_mantooth's avatar

wes_mantooth

Tomfoolery & shenanigans

17,977 posts
Apr 11, 2012 5:54 PM
I am def warming up to Richardson at 4 as long as we either move up or get a wr at 22.
Apr 11, 2012 5:54pm
F

Footwedge

Senior Member

9,265 posts
Apr 11, 2012 5:59 PM
Now that the tribe has been officially and mathematically eliminated, can't wait for football to start.
Apr 11, 2012 5:59pm