sherm03;1032420 wrote:1-Never said that. But I do find it funny that your peak posting times seem to be on Friday and Saturday nights when everyone else is out being social. More of an observation than saying that I am cooler than you. It just leads me to one of two conclusions. Either you're younger and just have a sad sad life where you don't have any friends and don't go out at all. Or you're older and just have a sad sad life where you relive you're Massillon glory days by coming on here and talking **** about private schools. Either way, you're just sad.
2-If you are able to post for over two hours straight on your phone, you have better battery life than just about everyone I have met with a smart phone. And if you were out and posting all that from the phone, you must have been out by yourself...or just not talking to anyone you were with.
3-Yep. You know how when women start talking about "that bitch from work" for the 900th time, you think to yourself, "well, I can either grab a beer...shoot myself in the face...or check something online while she's going on and on about this." Well, you can't have a beer in the cab and I didn't have a gun. So I decided to check in and see your hilarious priest/molestation jokes. On second thought, maybe you don't know what that's like when women do that. Let me put it in a way you'll understand. You know when you're sitting alone in your house, and your dog won't stop barking. So you think to yourself, "well, I can either grab the peanut butter and put him to work...shoot myself in the face...or check something online." That's kind of like what it was like in the cab last night in between bars.

sherm03;1032493 wrote:I'm generally curious.

I come on here to BS and talk sports. I'm not trying to grow a fan base or entertain anyone on here. But I'm interested to know who the comedians are that you do find funny.

skank;1032504 wrote:You were astute enough to figure out my, "peak posting times", figure this out.

skank;1032519 wrote:Ok, thanks. Maybe someday I'll be as cool as you and be able to post from my phone, while bar hopping with a bunch of backstabbing women.

skank;1032314 wrote:Nailed it.

skank;1032377 wrote:Yeah, I guess. That, or the fact that he just isn't funny.

sherm03;1030881 wrote:I don't want you to leave the site because people vote in this poll.

I want you to have some horrible accident where you lose all of your fingers and are just unable to use a computer keyboard and have to leave by default.

genghis dong;1032152 wrote:I get a kick out of how funny skank is. The same old priest joke everytime. I can just picture him sitting in his mom's basement. Wich I will also assume doubles for the litter box and palce the dog goes to the bathroom. Laughing out loud to himself as he posts these sweet jokes. His mom yells from upstairs "keep it down I can't hear Steve Wilkos." While she lays in her bed that she hasn't got out of in a year cause she's too fat.

skank;1032846 wrote:Wow, sherm didn't even see your lips move, of course, his belt buckle was probably in the way.

Let me guess, directly after posting this, sherm recieved a PM and it said.

"Was that good sherm?' "Did I get him good sherm?" "Did I make you happy sherm?"

skank;1032489 wrote:Really? Is this supposed to make people laugh? Do you think that people are reading this right now thinking, "Now that wormer, he has a quick wit"? Really?

GoChiefs;1032966 wrote:So you replied to him about that comment at 11:56 am. Then you re-quote the same comment at 8:25 pm? It took you over 8 hours to think of THAT? Smh.

GoChiefs;1033204 wrote:Nope, just think it's funny it took you all day to come up with something like that.

Continue crying....

skank;1033303 wrote:What I think is funny, is the fact that between you with your "time restrictions", and sherman with his "peak posting times", investigation, neither one of you can come up with anything intelligent to post. Not to mention Shermfeld can't post anything funny.

GoChiefs;1033314 wrote:A Massillon guy talking about intelligence. Now THAT is funny. Sorry Sherm, we got a new comedian on the OC.

skank;1033326 wrote:Seriously? How will I ever recover from THIS gem?

GoChiefs;1033335 wrote:This gem? My apologies if you assumed I was making a joke. Clearly, I wasn't joking.

Says the guy that has nothing but priest jokes.

skank;1033341 wrote:My apologies if you assumed I assumed you were joking, I meant it was a lame comeback. You should be used to this kind of response by now.

GoChiefs;1033346 wrote:A 'comeback' would imply I was telling a joke. Stating a fact isn't a 'comeback'.

Cue your joke about a priest and a comeback.

skank;1033352 wrote:So now a comeback has to be in response to a joke? Interesting.

skank;1033352 wrote:So now a comeback has to be in response to a joke? Interesting.

GoChiefs;1033364 wrote:Are you going all Thinthick on us today or something? Yes, generally a 'comeback' is a sarcastic reply to someone else's comment. Where as, there was absolutely no sarcasm in my reply.

Hope that helps.