robj55
Posts: 9,511
Apr 18, 2012 11:20pm
.075% from 3 for a PG, man is that awful
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Apr 18, 2012 11:34pm
Wall sucks. I've been saying that since he was drafted.
Hb31187
Posts: 8,534
Apr 18, 2012 11:47pm
He surely cant shoot, but hes still in the top half of the league as far as PG's id imagine(off the top of my head without thinking, so whoever is goin to nba.com and finding an entire list you can stop wasting your time)
Because I mean aside from his 3p%, his numbers are pretty close to the reigning MVP
Because I mean aside from his 3p%, his numbers are pretty close to the reigning MVP
Skyhook79
Posts: 5,739
Apr 19, 2012 7:39am
Maybe he just is sick and tired of playing for a bad team and doesn't care anymore.sleeper;1147630 wrote:Wall sucks. I've been saying that since he was drafted.
/SportsAndLady'd
Skyhook79
Posts: 5,739
Apr 19, 2012 7:43am
Let's compare him to a guy who has been hurt much much of the year.:rolleyes:Hb31187;1147633 wrote:He surely cant shoot, but hes still in the top half of the league as far as PG's id imagine(off the top of my head without thinking, so whoever is goin to nba.com and finding an entire list you can stop wasting your time)
Because I mean aside from his 3p%, his numbers are pretty close to the reigning MVP
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Apr 19, 2012 8:04am
I took that as comparing him to Rose's numbers last season.Skyhook79;1147693 wrote:Let's compare him to a guy who has been hurt much much of the year.:rolleyes:
Skyhook79
Posts: 5,739
Apr 19, 2012 8:11am
Then it's no comparison then. Rose's #'s were better last year.Commander of Awesome;1147709 wrote:I took that as comparing him to Rose's numbers last season.
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Apr 19, 2012 8:13am
That's just wrong.Skyhook79;1147725 wrote:Then it's no comparison then. Rose's #'s were better last year.
Skyhook79
Posts: 5,739
Apr 19, 2012 8:15am
So you are saying Wall's #'s are similar to Rose's in 2010-11 season?Commander of Awesome;1147727 wrote:That's just wrong.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Apr 19, 2012 8:16am
Which big 3 would you take:
Miami's or OKC's?
Miami's or OKC's?
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Apr 19, 2012 8:17am
Oh so you were proven yet again to be wrong so you're trying to change the subject?Skyhook79;1147734 wrote:So you are saying Wall's #'s are similar to Rose's in 2010-11 season?
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Apr 19, 2012 8:18am
Who's the 3rd for OKC, Harden, Iblocka, or Perkins?SportsAndLady;1147736 wrote:Which big 3 would you take:
Miami's or OKC's?
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Apr 19, 2012 8:20am
Yeah..dropped 40 last nightCommander of Awesome;1147739 wrote:Who's the 3rd for OKC, Harden?
16.8 ppg this season, shooting 49%
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Apr 19, 2012 8:23am
I hate FAILami so I'm probably biased, but give me OKC.SportsAndLady;1147742 wrote:Yeah..dropped 40 last night
16.8 ppg this season, shooting 49%
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
Apr 19, 2012 8:26am
OKC.
Nice variety with them.....Lebron and dwade are the same player
Nice variety with them.....Lebron and dwade are the same player
Skyhook79
Posts: 5,739
Apr 19, 2012 8:26am
Commander of Awesome;1147709 wrote:I took that as comparing him to Rose's numbers last season.
Skyhook79;1147725 wrote:Then it's no comparison then. Rose's #'s were better last year.
Commander of Awesome;1147727 wrote:That's just wrong.
Skyhook79;1147734 wrote:So you are saying Wall's #'s are similar to Rose's in 2010-11 season?
Typical.Commander of Awesome;1147738 wrote:Oh so you were proven yet again to be wrong so you're trying to change the subject?
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
Apr 19, 2012 8:29am
Would you take either of those "big three"over Bostons from a couple years ago?
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Apr 19, 2012 8:36am
No but I'd probably take Boston's big 4.wes_mantooth;1147749 wrote:Would you take either of those "big three"over Bostons from a couple years ago?
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Apr 19, 2012 8:38am
Thought so, thanks for trying failhook.Skyhook79;1147746 wrote:Typical.
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
Apr 19, 2012 8:38am
Commander of Awesome;1147754 wrote:No but I'd probably take Boston's big 4.
Yeah, rondo was the wildcard on those teams. Glad they collapsed
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Apr 19, 2012 8:40am
Didn't Boston basically just have to go through the Lakers in their championship run? I know they beat the Cavs, but that wasn't a GREAT Cavs team. Although that series was the GOAT series; I still remember that game 7 where Lebron and Pierce were going shot for shot.wes_mantooth;1147749 wrote:Would you take either of those "big three"over Bostons from a couple years ago?
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
Apr 19, 2012 8:41am
SportsAndLady;1147760 wrote:Didn't Boston basically just have to go through the Lakers in their championship run? I know they beat the Cavs, but that wasn't a GREAT Cavs team. Although that series was the GOAT series; I still remember that game 7 where Lebron and Pierce were going shot for shot.
Yeah, I think they beat the lakers in 6
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Apr 19, 2012 8:43am
Yeah..that was a loaded Boston team, no doubt...but that team in this season's NBA, I don't think they're a top 2 team. But they'd definitely be a tough out in the playoffs.
hoops23
Posts: 15,696
Apr 19, 2012 6:07pm
When is the last time all 8 EC playoff teams were over .500?
The 76ers currently in the 8th spot at 32-30, it's possible it may happen.
The 76ers currently in the 8th spot at 32-30, it's possible it may happen.
chicago510
Posts: 5,728
Apr 19, 2012 6:11pm
Bulls were 41-41 in 09 when they played the Cavs. Before that it was 04-05.hoops23;1148217 wrote:When is the last time all 8 EC playoff teams were over .500?
The 76ers currently in the 8th spot at 32-30, it's possible it may happen.