karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Dec 23, 2011 10:49am
ytownfootball;1024962 wrote:Right, because Herbstreit and Robert Smith have proven to be such big Homers lol.
ok. lol.
M
MontyBrunswick
Dec 23, 2011 11:10am
I voted that he'll stay at USC.
I think he has unfinished business there.
I think he has unfinished business there.
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Dec 23, 2011 11:13am
lol lotz is a joke lolkaren lotz;1024966 wrote:ok. lol.
lol
lol
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Dec 23, 2011 11:39am
ytownfootball;1024962 wrote:Right, because Herbstreit and Robert Smith have proven to be such big Homers lol.
Lotz is so used to hearing Lou Holtz sperm all over Notre dame on TV that he thinks Smith and herbie are doin the same thing I guess
ytownfootball
Posts: 6,978
Dec 23, 2011 11:41am
I mean....Herbie got run out of town.SportsAndLady;1025016 wrote:Lotz is so used to hearing Lou Holtz sperm all over Notre dame on TV that he thinks Smith and herbie are doin the same thing I guess
Skyhook79
Posts: 5,739
Dec 23, 2011 11:47am
They shouldn't be homers and thats why they are not bias unlike others at espn.ytownfootball;1024962 wrote:Right, because Herbstreit and Robert Smith have proven to be such big Homers lol.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Dec 23, 2011 11:55am
SportsAndLady;1025016 wrote:Lotz is so used to hearing Lou Holtz sperm all over Notre dame on TV that he thinks Smith and herbie are doin the same thing I guess
He "sperms" over pretty much everyone, including Ohio State, bro.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Dec 23, 2011 11:58am
ytownfootball;1025023 wrote:I mean....Herbie got run out of town.
That proves nothing except there are a lot of moronic bucknuts that think OSU can do no wrong.
ytownfootball
Posts: 6,978
Dec 23, 2011 12:30pm
You're not very receptive to proof when it's put in front of your face anyway so what the hell does it matter?karen lotz;1025055 wrote:That proves nothing except there are a lot of moronic bucknuts that think OSU can do no wrong.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Dec 23, 2011 12:33pm
karen lotz;1025048 wrote:He "sperms" over pretty much everyone, including Ohio State, bro.
Why did you put sperms in quotations
C
cats gone wild
Posts: 2,651
Dec 23, 2011 4:35pm
ESPN has their flagship program back next year.
They might be preseason top 5, but Karen......#1? LSU will be pre season #1 with ease next season.
I dont know how loaded USC will be, but they havent impressed me for years, and Kiffin's not a proven coach yet.
They might be preseason top 5, but Karen......#1? LSU will be pre season #1 with ease next season.
I dont know how loaded USC will be, but they havent impressed me for years, and Kiffin's not a proven coach yet.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Dec 23, 2011 5:11pm
SC very easily could be #1.
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Dec 23, 2011 5:22pm
no shit you pick LSU to be #1...diecats gone wild;1025370 wrote:ESPN has their flagship program back next year.
They might be preseason top 5, but Karen......#1? LSU will be pre season #1 with ease next season.
I dont know how loaded USC will be, but they havent impressed me for years, and Kiffin's not a proven coach yet.
C
cats gone wild
Posts: 2,651
Dec 23, 2011 5:29pm
Not a chance. No chance whatsoever. You can quote me on this in the future if you want.karen lotz;1025393 wrote:SC very easily could be #1.
LSU will be #1 because they are supposed to be better next year and return alot (very young team)
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Dec 23, 2011 5:36pm
cats gone wild;1025412 wrote:Not a chance. No chance whatsoever. You can quote me on this in the future if you want.
LSU will be #1 because they are supposed to be better next year and return alot (very young team)
I don't have to quote you on it for the future. Everyone knows how you feel about LSU. I believe SC returns 20 starters next year, including what will be the best QB in the country and two of the best WRs in the country.
Pick6
Posts: 14,946
Dec 23, 2011 5:45pm
USC will be top 5 preseason. I dont think #1. though.
C
cats gone wild
Posts: 2,651
Dec 23, 2011 5:45pm
I wasnt saying quote me on LSU being #1, but USC not being preseason #1. Im glad that USC will be back tho. Been waiting to have a crack at them for years. Not looking forward to the ESPN hype and the USC band playing the same song over and over thokaren lotz;1025414 wrote:I don't have to quote you on it for the future. Everyone knows how you feel about LSU. I believe SC returns 20 starters next year, including what will be the best QB in the country and two of the best WRs in the country.
LSU is losing some good players, but with their depth and easier schedule next year, Im not too worried. And LSU will actually have someone who can throw a football, something that hasnt happened in 4 years.
But, who knows........the media threw Oklahoma into the #1 spot for no reason this year, so maybe someone else will be preseason #1. But, I doubt it.
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Dec 23, 2011 6:18pm
Only if they win the NC this year. If they don't, they will not be preseason #1 next year, and you can definitely quote me on that.cats gone wild;1025412 wrote:Not a chance. No chance whatsoever. You can quote me on this in the future if you want.
LSU will be #1 because they are supposed to be better next year and return alot (very young team)
C
cats gone wild
Posts: 2,651
Dec 23, 2011 9:12pm
I will. How many times have teams not won titles and got ranked #1 the following year? Probably happens more than it doesnt. Most teams after title games lose alot of talent, but LSU will be better.vball10set;1025435 wrote:Only if they win the NC this year. If they don't, they will not be preseason #1 next year, and you can definitely quote me on that.
Jughead
Posts: 1,261
Dec 23, 2011 11:03pm
The real question is, "How long does it take for a pro team to realize that USC QB's are worthless?"
GOONx19
Posts: 7,147
Dec 24, 2011 1:13am
100+ teams will fail to win the title this year and go on to NOT get ranked #1 next year. So you're wrong there. And it won't be hard for LSU to get better next year, because their offense can't get any worse.cats gone wild;1025483 wrote:I will. How many times have teams not won titles and got ranked #1 the following year? Probably happens more than it doesnt. Most teams after title games lose alot of talent, but LSU will be better.
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Dec 24, 2011 7:10am
I'm assuming most teams are in this category, but I'm referring to LSU in this particular case. IMO, if they win, they'll be preseason #1--if they don't, they won't.cats gone wild;1025483 wrote:I will. How many times have teams not won titles and got ranked #1 the following year? Probably happens more than it doesnt. Most teams after title games lose alot of talent, but LSU will be better.
C
centralbucksfan
Posts: 5,111
Dec 24, 2011 9:51am
I keep hearing LSU will be better next year. How about we wait and see. How many times have we heard that before, and a team goes on to lose 2/3 games.cats gone wild;1025483 wrote:I will. How many times have teams not won titles and got ranked #1 the following year? Probably happens more than it doesnt. Most teams after title games lose alot of talent, but LSU will be better.
C
cats gone wild
Posts: 2,651
Dec 24, 2011 11:32am
Way to be totally off on what me and vball are talking about. And yeah, LSU has a horrible offense :rolleyes:GOONx19;1025598 wrote:100+ teams will fail to win the title this year and go on to NOT get ranked #1 next year. So you're wrong there. And it won't be hard for LSU to get better next year, because their offense can't get any worse.
Preseason #1 no matter what.vball10set;1025637 wrote:I'm assuming most teams are in this category, but I'm referring to LSU in this particular case. IMO, if they win, they'll be preseason #1--if they don't, they won't.
Its just easy to go off of when they play alot easier of a schedule, have a real passing QB, whole stable of RB/FB's back, Heisman candidate back, playing Bama at home, and alot of young-experienced talent coming back.centralbucksfan;1025694 wrote:I keep hearing LSU will be better next year. How about we wait and see. How many times have we heard that before, and a team goes on to lose 2/3 games.
C
centralbucksfan
Posts: 5,111
Dec 24, 2011 11:34am
A real passing QB? One with zero experience you mean? Its never as easy as it sounds. Thats why the preseason #1 team rarely ends up winning it all.cats gone wild;1025751 wrote: Its just easy to go off of when they play alot easier of a schedule, have a real passing QB, whole stable of RB/FB's back, playing Bama at home, and alot of young-experienced talent coming back.