ytownfootball
Posts: 6,978
Dec 23, 2011 9:38am
ESPiN is already handjobbin' them.Skyhook79;1024880 wrote:USC is loaded for next year, why wouldn't they be in the conversation?
Skyhook79
Posts: 5,739
Dec 23, 2011 9:58am
So you don't think they are a contender next year?ytownfootball;1024886 wrote:ESPiN is already handjobbin' them.
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Dec 23, 2011 9:58am
This. They'll be preseason top 5, maybe even top 3.Skyhook79;1024880 wrote:USC is loaded for next year, why wouldn't they be in the conversation?
ytownfootball
Posts: 6,978
Dec 23, 2011 10:01am
Didn't say that, they'll be a contender, and we'll all be sick of hearing about them.Skyhook79;1024904 wrote:So you don't think they are a contender next year?
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Dec 23, 2011 10:05am
with this schedule (unless TBA is a stud team, which is highly unlikely), it appears they have as good a chance as any team in the country, especially w/Oregon, Washington, Cal & ND at home)
| [h=1]12/01/12[/h] | [h=1]UCLA[/h] | [h=1]Pasadena, CA[/h] |
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Dec 23, 2011 10:07am
with their schedule, it appears they have as good a chance as any team in the country, especially w/Oregon, Washington, Cal & ND at home
http://t-wire.com/2012-schedule/
http://t-wire.com/2012-schedule/
Skyhook79
Posts: 5,739
Dec 23, 2011 10:18am
Makes sense. If it were Ohio State would you be sick of hearing about them too?ytownfootball;1024906 wrote:Didn't say that, they'll be a contender, and we'll all be sick of hearing about them.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Dec 23, 2011 10:18am
Preseason #1.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Dec 23, 2011 10:18am
Skyhook79;1024926 wrote:Makes sense. If it were Ohio State would you be sick of hearing about them too?
Are you an SC fan?
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Dec 23, 2011 10:19am
obviously not you fucking idiot.Skyhook79;1024926 wrote:Makes sense. If it were Ohio State would you be sick of hearing about them too?
ytownfootball
Posts: 6,978
Dec 23, 2011 10:20am
Of course not, but everyone else would be.Skyhook79;1024926 wrote:Makes sense. If it were Ohio State would you be sick of hearing about them too?
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Dec 23, 2011 10:22am
Also, that wouldn't be possible because ESPN has a bias against OSU.
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Dec 23, 2011 10:23am
please tell us more karen?karen lotz;1024932 wrote:Also, that wouldn't be possible because ESPN has a bias against OSU.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Dec 23, 2011 10:25am
Ask ytown, he'll tell you all about it.DeyDurkie5;1024934 wrote:please tell us more karen?
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Dec 23, 2011 10:26am
I want you to tell me about it, that's why i asked you.karen lotz;1024936 wrote:Ask ytown, he'll tell you all about it.
ytownfootball
Posts: 6,978
Dec 23, 2011 10:26am
Mark May says you're full of shit...karen lotz;1024932 wrote:Also, that wouldn't be possible because ESPN has a bias against OSU.
Skyhook79
Posts: 5,739
Dec 23, 2011 10:26am
No, but then again I do not only wear scarlet and gray glasses.karen lotz;1024928 wrote:Are you an SC fan?
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Dec 23, 2011 10:27am
DeyDurkie5;1024938 wrote:I want you to tell me about it, that's why i asked you.
ytown explains it better.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Dec 23, 2011 10:28am
ah ok, I really was just wondering.Skyhook79;1024940 wrote:No, but then again I do not only wear scarlet and gray glasses.
ytownfootball
Posts: 6,978
Dec 23, 2011 10:29am
:thumbup:karen lotz;1024941 wrote:ytown explains it better.
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Dec 23, 2011 10:31am
20,000 posts on this site, and you can't explain a simple statement?karen lotz;1024941 wrote:ytown explains it better.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Dec 23, 2011 10:35am
DeyDurkie5;1024948 wrote:20,000 posts on this site, and you can't explain a simple statement?
Well, you see... I don't think there is an OSU bias from ESPN, my post was sarcastic. ytown believes there is a bias and he provided excellent examples for that argument, which is why he should explain it to you.
Skyhook79
Posts: 5,739
Dec 23, 2011 10:37am
I don't espn has a bias against OSU, I do think certain employees of espn certainly do.karen lotz;1024953 wrote:Well, you see... I don't think there is an OSU bias from ESPN, my post was sarcastic. ytown believes there is a bias and he provided excellent examples for that argument, which is why he should explain it to you.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Dec 23, 2011 10:42am
Skyhook79;1024955 wrote:I don't espn has a bias against OSU, I do think certain employees of espn certainly do.
Yeah that's true for sure. There are also quite a few former Buckeyes that work there so it balances out.
ytownfootball
Posts: 6,978
Dec 23, 2011 10:44am
Right, because Herbstreit and Robert Smith have proven to be such big Homers lol.karen lotz;1024960 wrote:Yeah that's true for sure. There are also quite a few former Buckeyes that work there so it balances out.