Rotinaj;1221046 wrote:I wasn't aware. I really don't care how much money they gave him.
Huh??
Rotinaj;1221046 wrote:I wasn't aware. I really don't care how much money they gave him.
I meant I wasn't aware he was a ufa and I wouldn't mind how much the Cavs gave him. He's a douche but I'd love to have him.Midstate01;1221059 wrote:Huh??
ohiobucks1;1221072 wrote:I don't want anyone this year that will keep us out of the lottery. One more lottery + a key FA or two and we have a baller team
How many key free agents have we got lately? I think if we can get Bynum now it'd be dumb not to.ohiobucks1;1221072 wrote:I don't want anyone this year that will keep us out of the lottery. One more lottery + a key FA or two and we have a baller team
ohiobucks1;1221072 wrote:I don't want anyone this year that will keep us out of the lottery. One more lottery + a key FA or two and we have a baller team
Bynum wouldnt happen until after next season. The Cavs will have another lottery pick next season.ohiobucks1;1221072 wrote:I don't want anyone this year that will keep us out of the lottery. One more lottery + a key FA or two and we have a baller team
I'm not taking Humphries alone, if we can get another draft pick that's a different storyMidstate01;1221087 wrote:It wouldn't be this year. It'd be next for Bynum. If you mean humphries, well he doesn't put the cavs over the top or anything.
I'm not. A young PG who is likely going to be a superstar and locked up for the next several years... The Cavs have potentially put together a nice young core and Bynum probably feels the team will be in a great position, especially with him at Center.KR1245;1221037 wrote:I agree. I'm surprised that he mentioned Cleveland, that usually doesnt happen
hoops23;1221129 wrote:I'm not. A young PG who is likely going to be a superstar and locked up for the next several years... The Cavs have potentially put together a nice young core and Bynum probably feels the team will be in a great position, especially with him at Center.
I'd LOVE to have him.
Players would have come to Cleveland had LeBron told them he was staying past his last contract.
lol. Well, why the hell else would he want to come to Cleveland? Our new casino? The melt?wes_mantooth;1221130 wrote:I don't honestly believe bynum is smart enough to comprehend that.
Browns season tickets.hoops23;1221132 wrote:lol. Well, why the hell else would he want to come to Cleveland? Our new casino? The melt?
hoops23;1221132 wrote:lol. Well, why the hell else would he want to come to Cleveland? Our new casino? The melt?
Rotinaj;1221141 wrote:Browns season tickets.
Damnit... Ok, ok.. I concede.. Especially Mrs. Masterson's cookies!wes_mantooth;1221142 wrote:Melt and the aquarium....maybe masterson's wife's cookies.
That is my guess
KR1245;1221090 wrote:Bynum wouldnt happen until after next season. The Cavs will have another lottery pick next season.
Agreed, it really doesn't make any sense unless the Cavs another first round pick that I am not aware of.sportswizuhrd;1221105 wrote:I read from another basketball guy(I follow too many to remember exactly who it was, but will look again), that the Cavs would give up a first rounder.
And Wojo just tweeted this...
Cleveland's interest with Humphries is exclusively to use him as a means to stockpile further draft picks and assets, league source says.
So we would be giving up OUR first round pick to get Humphries so we can turn around and try to trade him? I don't see him being better than a 1st and 2nd so we would basically be trading our 1st to get another teams 1st(which probably won't be as good as ours) and a 2nd. There is no point in it really!
| johnhollinger Cleveland has cap space to sign Hump outright and showed no interest in doing so. Nets need some serious sweeteners. 7/8/12 7:33 PM |
It would. Humphries is actually a pretty decent player, but he's overpriced and doesn't fit into our future plans. If we decide to do a trade I'd have to imagine we have a grand plan in mind that won't end with this trade.hoops23;1221195 wrote:Sounds like it may still take a lot to get the Cavs interested though.
What will they be trading then? (more so of an open question to anyone than to you gport, just quoting this).gport_tennis;1221169 wrote:Again, people: Cleveland isn't providing picks to trade for a player it can sign for free. Any picks are going the other way. -- John Hollinger (@johnhollinger)
Fwiw