S
Sonofanump
Jan 5, 2012 10:55am
You looking for a biased or unbiased opinion?vball10set;1039658 wrote:This would be a great question for ESPN's SportsNation...I'll shoot Colin an email and see what he thinks
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Jan 5, 2012 11:05am
FYI, I just looked at the fake FG (possible man down field) play. When Dileo throws it, the OL farthest down the field was actually only a yard past the LOS. I think the way it played out is just seemed like they were further down.
[video=youtube;hDKDqBRbCTI][/video]
[video=youtube;hDKDqBRbCTI][/video]
B
bigkahuna
Posts: 4,454
Jan 5, 2012 11:11am
^^Yea, the 2 that were down field were receivers #84 and looked like #49
S
Sonofanump
Jan 5, 2012 11:30am
I have just been informed that the crew that worked this game was also a PAC10 crew. They may have been instructed not to call this type of action by their supervisor after this game.WebFire;1039314 wrote:That's kind of weak. Either it is or it isn't.
http://rivals.yahoo.com/video/college-football/Highlights-Giorgio-Tavecchios-Penalty-vs-Oregon-885412
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Jan 5, 2012 11:48am
I'm looking for any opinion, just on a national level. For the record, IMO, all opinions are biased in some way (and you do know I was kidding about emailing Cowherd, right?)Sonofanump;1039689 wrote:You looking for a biased or unbiased opinion?
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Jan 5, 2012 11:53am
Not sure if our needs its own thread, but Darryl Stonum got a ticket for driving on a revoked license. How does that effect his red shirt? Here I was told taking games away changes behavior.
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Jan 5, 2012 12:17pm
Stonum is an idiot.karen lotz;1039752 wrote:Not sure if our needs its own thread, but Darryl Stonum got a ticket for driving on a revoked license. How does that effect his red shirt? Here I was told taking games away changes behavior.
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Jan 5, 2012 12:17pm
Of course they are biased. Otherwise they wouldn't be opinions.vball10set;1039747 wrote:I'm looking for any opinion, just on a national level. For the record, IMO, all opinions are biased in some way (and you do know I was kidding about emailing Cowherd, right?)
Abe Vigoda
Posts: 164
Jan 5, 2012 12:24pm
Been surfing the college officiating forums. The general consensuses was that it was not a catch, but not enough to over turn the call on the field. However, two of the FG's Michigan kicked, the kicker false stared by moving forward before the snap was not called and should have been. Bottom line, the VT coach was an idiot, and is way past his prime.Scarlet_Buckeye;1039635 wrote:It's not just "Scarlet & Gray" nation either tho. Most of the country thinks it was a rip.
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Jan 5, 2012 12:25pm
That was my point--I wasn't quite sure why sonofanump asked me thatWebFire;1039783 wrote:Of course they are biased. Otherwise they wouldn't be opinions.
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Jan 5, 2012 12:27pm
His decision on the fake punt was mind boggling, but that's the way he's always coached--and it really bit him on the ass this time.Abe Vigoda;1039800 wrote:Bottom line, the VT coach was an idiot, and is way past his prime.
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Jan 5, 2012 12:32pm
He Zook'd that call for sure.vball10set;1039806 wrote:His decision on the fake punt was mind boggling, but that's the way he's always coached--and it really bit him on the ass this time.
OneBuckeye
Posts: 5,888
Jan 5, 2012 1:52pm
Did Brady Hoke take his shirt off?
I also love the Holly Rowe forearm after the game.
I also love the Holly Rowe forearm after the game.
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Jan 5, 2012 4:45pm
I haven't heard yet. If he did, I hope no pics get leaked!OneBuckeye;1039948 wrote:Did Brady Hoke take his shirt off?
I also love the Holly Rowe forearm after the game.
S
Sonofanump
Jan 5, 2012 4:49pm
Interesting.Abe Vigoda;1039800 wrote:Been surfing the college officiating forums. The general consensuses was that it was not a catch, but not enough to over turn the call on the field. However, two of the FG's Michigan kicked, the kicker false stared by moving forward before the snap was not called and should have been.
B
bigkahuna
Posts: 4,454
Jan 6, 2012 10:23am
At first, I thought it was a run/punt option that we see a lot of now...like the rugby style punt. You know, if it's there take it, if not, then punt.. It seemed to me that the punter just made a bad choice.vball10set;1039806 wrote:His decision on the fake punt was mind boggling, but that's the way he's always coached--and it really bit him on the ass this time.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Jan 6, 2012 10:26am
Abe Vigoda;1039800 wrote:Been surfing the college officiating forums. The general consensuses was that it was not a catch, but not enough to over turn the call on the field. However, two of the FG's Michigan kicked, the kicker false stared by moving forward before the snap was not called and should have been. Bottom line, the VT coach was an idiot, and is way past his prime.
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Jan 6, 2012 11:25am
Could very well have been...regardless, it was a bad choice, whoever made it :thumbdown:bigkahuna;1040985 wrote:At first, I thought it was a run/punt option that we see a lot of now...like the rugby style punt. You know, if it's there take it, if not, then punt.. It seemed to me that the punter just made a bad choice.