dwccrew
Posts: 7,817
Dec 15, 2011 5:29pm
Why would it be a good marketing match-up when one player is MUCH better than the other? The only way it would be a good marketing match-up is if they were on the same level, which they clearly are not.WebFire;1015270 wrote:He wasn't comparing. He was saying it would be a good marketing matchup, which it would. No one said DR was better, but you felt the need to say the obvious. A clear shot. Don't be so sensitive, you guys lost.
LOL, yeah I'm being sensitive because OSU lost even though I picked Michigan to win that game. LOL, good luck in your bowl game, not that you'll need it against VA Tech.
Maybe Michigan will get their 2nd ever BCS win and first bowl win since Jan 1, 2008. 2-6 in the last decade in bowls, gotta improve that record.
http://bentley.umich.edu/athdept/football/bowls/
Now there's a shot for ya.
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Dec 15, 2011 7:22pm
I see, so there has to be 2 Heisman winners in the same bowl to be marketable. What a dumb fucking post.dwccrew;1016335 wrote:Why would it be a good marketing match-up when one player is MUCH better than the other? The only way it would be a good marketing match-up is if they were on the same level, which they clearly are not.
LOL, yeah I'm being sensitive because OSU lost even though I picked Michigan to win that game. LOL, good luck in your bowl game, not that you'll need it against VA Tech.
Maybe Michigan will get their 2nd ever BCS win and first bowl win since Jan 1, 2008. 2-6 in the last decade in bowls, gotta improve that record.
http://bentley.umich.edu/athdept/football/bowls/
Now there's a shot for ya.
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Dec 15, 2011 7:24pm
Oooh, first since 2008! Good luck in your shit bowl, trying to get your first ever win against the SEC.dwccrew;1016335 wrote:Why would it be a good marketing match-up when one player is MUCH better than the other? The only way it would be a good marketing match-up is if they were on the same level, which they clearly are not.
LOL, yeah I'm being sensitive because OSU lost even though I picked Michigan to win that game. LOL, good luck in your bowl game, not that you'll need it against VA Tech.
Maybe Michigan will get their 2nd ever BCS win and first bowl win since Jan 1, 2008. 2-6 in the last decade in bowls, gotta improve that record.
http://bentley.umich.edu/athdept/football/bowls/
Now there's a shot for ya.
dwccrew
Posts: 7,817
Dec 15, 2011 10:46pm
To be on the same level both would have to be Heisman winners? LOL, Denard wasn't even mentioned after about 4 games in Heisman talk.WebFire;1016412 wrote:I see, so there has to be 2 Heisman winners in the same bowl to be marketable. What a dumb ****ing post.
It wasn't a dumb post, just a dumb interpretation by you.
This is plain wrong. OSU has beaten the SEC before. They have even won a bowl game against the SEC, but then self-vacated it. I didn't think you would have to resort to CGW like posts, I was just having a little fun with ya, didn't think you'd get all bent out of shape like little bitchy CGW.WebFire;1016415 wrote:Oooh, first since 2008! Good luck in your **** bowl, trying to get your first ever win against the SEC.
dwccrew
Posts: 7,817
Dec 15, 2011 10:48pm
Here, I'll make a post that you'll like..
Oh what it would have been had Baylor and Michigan played in this bowl. Denard vs. RGIII would have been a dream match-up. Heisman winner vs. the best running back that plays quarterback. Sigh, I guess we'll just have to watch Denard run for 3 td's, throw for 2 td's and throw 2 picks.
Oh what it would have been had Baylor and Michigan played in this bowl. Denard vs. RGIII would have been a dream match-up. Heisman winner vs. the best running back that plays quarterback. Sigh, I guess we'll just have to watch Denard run for 3 td's, throw for 2 td's and throw 2 picks.
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Dec 15, 2011 10:51pm
According to you. And I'm not sure what your second sentence of that has to do with this.dwccrew;1016630 wrote:To be on the same level both would have to be Heisman winners? LOL, Denard wasn't even mentioned after about 4 games in Heisman talk.
First ever bowl win. Vacate is vacate. If you want to be a dumbass about it, I will be too.dwccrew;1016630 wrote:This is plain wrong. OSU has beaten the SEC before. They have even won a bowl game against the SEC, but then self-vacated it. I didn't think you would have to resort to CGW like posts, I was just having a little fun with ya, didn't think you'd get all bent out of shape like little bitchy CGW.
dwccrew
Posts: 7,817
Dec 15, 2011 10:56pm
I can't disagree, it would be their first recorded bowl win against the SEC, but they have beaten the SEC in a bowl game. You can't un-play the game, it just was erased from the record books, not reality.WebFire;1016634 wrote:According to you. And I'm not sure what your second sentence of that has to do with this.
First ever bowl win. Vacate is vacate. If you want to be a dumbass about it, I will be too.
D
dave
Posts: 4,558
Dec 16, 2011 6:18pm
Denard is a terrible passer web, didn't you see how bad he was against all those 4 and 5 star recruits on the ohio state D.
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Dec 17, 2011 3:53pm
va tech by 12
dwccrew
Posts: 7,817
Dec 18, 2011 3:53pm
Can't say I disagree with the underlined part of your post. I don't think he did very bad against Ohio State's D, but then again OSU was a 6-6 team with a 3-5 B1G record, so not that impressive.dave;1017538 wrote:Denard is a terrible passer web, didn't you see how bad he was against all those 4 and 5 star recruits on the ohio state D.
Hb31187
Posts: 8,534
Dec 18, 2011 11:49pm
Pryor ripping Michigan apart for a few years sure was though. Cant have it both waysdwccrew;1018954 wrote:Can't say I disagree with the underlined part of your post. I don't think he did very bad against Ohio State's D, but then again OSU was a 6-6 team with a 3-5 B1G record, so not that impressive.
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Dec 19, 2011 10:51am
[video=youtube;ncMzDz75Sd8][/video]
D
dave
Posts: 4,558
Dec 19, 2011 12:32pm
loldwccrew;1018954 wrote:Can't say I disagree with the underlined part of your post. I don't think he did very bad against Ohio State's D, but then again OSU was a 6-6 team with a 3-5 B1G record, so not that impressive.
T
Tiernan
Posts: 13,021
Dec 20, 2011 9:18am
Hope Hokies humiliate Hokey
rmolin73
Posts: 4,278
Dec 21, 2011 12:00am
Wow how lame.Tiernan;1021499 wrote:Hope Hokies humiliate Hokey
dwccrew
Posts: 7,817
Dec 21, 2011 3:57am
Please show me where I have ever said Pryor ripping Michigan was impressive. I haven't. Michigan the last 3 years was like playing Indiana for Ohio State. Nice try though. Also, this year's Ohio State team, as bad as they were, was a lot better than the 3 previous Michigan teams.Hb31187;1019670 wrote:Pryor ripping Michigan apart for a few years sure was though. Cant have it both ways
FatHobbit
Posts: 8,651
Dec 21, 2011 9:40am
Isn't it "funny" how much better UM was without RR? They were TERRIBLE the last three years and Hoke gets them a BCS bowl his first year.dwccrew;1022719 wrote:Michigan the last 3 years was like playing Indiana for Ohio State. Nice try though. Also, this year's Ohio State team, as bad as they were, was a lot better than the 3 previous Michigan teams.
dwccrew
Posts: 7,817
Dec 21, 2011 11:19am
RR is proof that the Big East is a joke of a conference. Hoke is 10X better and will make Michigan a contender and formidable opponent once again.FatHobbit;1022832 wrote:Isn't it "funny" how much better UM was without RR? They were TERRIBLE the last three years and Hoke gets them a BCS bowl his first year.
Hb31187
Posts: 8,534
Dec 22, 2011 5:51pm
Didnt mean you in particular. But pre-scandal plenty of OSU fans would of told you Pryor and his record vs michigan and his performances were impresivedwccrew;1022719 wrote:Please show me where I have ever said Pryor ripping Michigan was impressive. I haven't. Michigan the last 3 years was like playing Indiana for Ohio State. Nice try though. Also, this year's Ohio State team, as bad as they were, was a lot better than the 3 previous Michigan teams.
Classyposter58
Posts: 6,321
Dec 23, 2011 1:25am
That's kinda gayWebFire;1019898 wrote:[video=youtube;ncMzDz75Sd8][/video]
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Dec 23, 2011 8:38am
Yeah, highlights of football teams are gay. :rolleyes:
dwccrew
Posts: 7,817
Dec 23, 2011 3:53pm
Definitely the one of the Notre Dame football players ice skating was.WebFire;1024839 wrote:Yeah, highlights of football teams are gay. :rolleyes:
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Dec 23, 2011 9:15pm
Very true.dwccrew;1025335 wrote:Definitely the one of the Notre Dame football players ice skating was.
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Dec 29, 2011 1:01pm
Brink and Heininger are out for this game. Even though Heininger is a starter, I think UM will be fine. I hurts depth more than anything. Good time for Campbell and Black to step and show they will lead the way next year.
D
dave
Posts: 4,558
Dec 30, 2011 5:35pm
I'm about ready to write off Campbell. He better get his shit together or he might get passed over by some true freshmen next year.
VT lost their 2nd string kicker now. Looks like they will be in 4 down territory when they are between the 15-35yrd lines.
VT lost their 2nd string kicker now. Looks like they will be in 4 down territory when they are between the 15-35yrd lines.