Beat to it.
No, that wasn't what did it.Manhattan Buckeye;1002071 wrote:Was it their awesome win over Georgia Southern in their late season "bye" that convinced you?
No, that wasn't what did it.Manhattan Buckeye;1002071 wrote:Was it their awesome win over Georgia Southern in their late season "bye" that convinced you?
True I just wanted to say Pwn'd.WebFire;1002021 wrote:Not much PWN when my point is still valid.
Meh. I don't see the big deal. Ohio State had a literal bye on November 6th last year, giving them 2 weeks to prepare for Penn State. It happens.Manhattan Buckeye;1002122 wrote:"Why does it matter when teams appear on your schedule? "
Because effectively it gives a team a late season "bye". Alabama/Auburn got two weeks to prepare for each other because their respective bands would likely beat the likes of Samford (sorry, UTC was last year) and Georgia Southern.
It is lame.
The literal bye is actually counter productive if you're on a roll imo. I really don't have a problem with when the cakes de cup are scheduled.Mulva;1002142 wrote:Meh. I don't see the big deal. Ohio State had a literal bye on November 6th last year, giving them 2 weeks to prepare for Penn State. It happens.
A lot teams have off weeks in late October or November. How is it lame? This is a horrible stretch to try and discredit the SEC. Wow.Manhattan Buckeye;1002122 wrote:"Why does it matter when teams appear on your schedule? "
Because effectively it gives a team a late season "bye". Alabama/Auburn got two weeks to prepare for each other because their respective bands would likely beat the likes of Samford (sorry, UTC was last year) and Georgia Southern.
It is lame.
Mulva;1002142 wrote:Meh. I don't see the big deal. Ohio State had a literal bye on November 6th last year, giving them 2 weeks to prepare for Penn State. It happens.
I lol'dsleeper;1002182 wrote:I think it finally happened. Domers have now joined the SEC bandwagon so they can drag the rest of college football fans to be as miserable as they are.
Then schedule a bye, and not move a cupcake from August until November. It is lame.karen lotz;1002174 wrote:A lot teams have off weeks in late October or November. How is it lame? This is a horrible stretch to try and discredit the SEC. Wow.
Manhattan Buckeye;1002213 wrote:Then schedule a bye, and not move a cupcake from August until November. It is lame.
I'm not saying they had to game plan a lot for those teams, but I guarantee you they spent some time on it and weren't watching film only on the next week's opponents.Manhattan Buckeye;1002218 wrote:"Weeks where a team has to play a live football game and can't focus solely on the opponent two weeks away is lame."
That's so nuts even a ND fan can't defend that. How much game film do you think Auburn watched of Samford this year? They could have started their third string and would have won that game. If you don't think the SEC teams purposefully schedule these teams at the end of the year, I don't know where to begin. There is a reason why they do it. It is a guaranteed win at the end of the season (and we all know team that lose late get screwed) and pretty much a bye week.
Because you are saying it is only the SEC that does it. Was Ohio State lame for having a bye last November before they played Penn State? You fail to address that.Manhattan Buckeye;1002243 wrote:"I think Georgia played GaTech late in the season. Guaranteed win at the end of the season? "
That's an annual rivalry, as is UF-FSU.
I don't think Samford/Auburn or Georgia Southern/Bama are annual rivalries. Or LSU and Western Kentucky. Or Tennessee and MTSU.
It is very obvious that many SEC schools game the system to their advantage, whether it is oversigning or scheduling a patsy in November, I'm not sure why this is a controversial opinion.
Prove it.Tiger2003;1002242 wrote:Ok State is not the second best team in the country and Bama is.
Because it was an actual bye week, and by scheduling it then they had to lose one earlier in the season.karen lotz;1002249 wrote:Because you are saying it is only the SEC that does it. Was Ohio State lame for having a bye last November before they played Penn State? You fail to address that.
FIFYMulva;1001640 wrote:I'll watch, because I'm a college football fan and it's the mythical championship game.
If there wasn't going to be a rematch in 2006, there shouldn't be one now. Back then, all the experts said OSU and UM were 1 and 2 going into the last game of the season...but the pollsters felt it was wrong to give UM a second bite at the apple.Tiger2003;1002242 wrote:I'll probably watch. But you guys are being some whinny ass bitches. If you want something to whine about, whine about Ok State not beating powerhouse Iowa St. Ok State is not the second best team in the country and Bama is.