ghostrider;1272551 wrote:On the coaching aspect; Does anyone else find it peculiar that the bears only surrendered a def tf in the 1st half against TV. , down 14-7 toRidgewood and held Triway to 7 1st half points. All 3 game were winning siuations and toe to toe matchups, evn given the lack of line play. The irony is the halftime adjustmdmets made/not made for the previously mentioned teams tto come ouy after the half and take control.
The riciculous motion on the fake punt screamed for the defense to key on it and yes was a huge swing of momentum in the game.
The former youth coach did alot of damage, I will not deny th::at. I will say that Hillsdale and Norwayne has it going positive from the ground up with everyone on the same page. What is Waynedales youth/jr high doing on offense to coincide with vars
ity? Is Z involved in anyway with establishing the program from the ground up? Are things just done how they always have been? BTW his 1st 2 years he inherited a team that was established and it was general concensus to hand Nofsinger the ball.
He is very involved with establishing the program from the ground up. HE is the one who made the decision to relieve the "former youth coach" of his duties. He is always in communication with his lower level coaches.
"Inherited a team that was established"? They were 3-7 and 5-5 the two years prior to him taking over. That's established? However, he was an assistant for those teams and he was responsible for the off-season lifting program. So if they were "established" then he deserves a little credit for that.
"It was the general concensus to hand Nofsinger the ball"? So you would agree that you have to have the horses to win? Right? Do we have any "horses" right now? Plus, if everyone in the stadium knew Nofsinger was getting the ball, he must have come up with game plans to make him successful. Right? Probably not.
Like I have always said on here....It's easy to 2nd guess from the peanut gallery aka "the fence".