Ohio Chatter
Ohio Chatter

Forums

All Threads Serious Business Sports Politics Archive Pick 'ems Wordio
Log In Create Account

#22 Michigan def. Illinois, 31-14

Home ▸ Archive ▸ College Sports ▸ #22 Michigan def. Illinois, 31-14
V

vball10set

paying it forward

24,795 posts
Nov 13, 2011 12:53 AM
dave;969916 wrote: The Big 10 is terrible this year.
/thread
Nov 12, 2011 7:53pm
merv's avatar

merv

Senior Member

174 posts
Nov 13, 2011 1:08 AM
Hamp89;961727 wrote:I like Illinois here in a close one. UM looking to make the annual year end crash yet again.
:thumbup:

LOL!!!
Nov 12, 2011 8:08pm
W

WebFire

Go Bucks!

14,779 posts
Nov 13, 2011 2:10 AM
vball10set;969920 wrote:/thread
But sleeper says it's because the B1G is deep. LOL

Anyway, we might have a bit of a QB "controversy" going on.
Nov 12, 2011 9:10pm
B

bigkahuna

Senior Member

4,454 posts
Nov 13, 2011 4:46 PM
I know I've said this before, but I'm in love with Fitzgerald Toussaint and his running ability.
Nov 13, 2011 11:46am
dwccrew's avatar

dwccrew

Not Banned

7,817 posts
Nov 13, 2011 6:22 PM
WebFire;969994 wrote:But sleeper says it's because the B1G is deep. LOL

Anyway, we might have a bit of a QB "controversy" going on.
If I'm a UM fan, you have to want Gardner in there. Robinson is just not that good this season. He has been figured out. He can't pass the ball worth a shit. Gardner is the guy if I'm Brady Hoke.

UM's defense is looking much better this season. Still have some holes, but they are far and away better than the previous few seasons.
Nov 13, 2011 1:22pm
W

WebFire

Go Bucks!

14,779 posts
Nov 13, 2011 6:52 PM
Mattison deserves every penny they are paying him. Check this out...

Category, rank (2010 rank)

scoring defense, 5th (107th)
total defense, 16th (110th)
rushing defense, 36th (95th)
passing defense, 21st (112th)
first downs allowed, 21st (107th)
turnovers gained, 14th, (76th)
opponent 3rd down conversions, 40th (95th)
oppenent red zone conversions 1st, (89th)
sacks, 46th, (93rd)
Nov 13, 2011 1:52pm
B

bigkahuna

Senior Member

4,454 posts
Nov 13, 2011 6:56 PM
WebFire;970820 wrote:Mattison deserves every penny they are paying him. Check this out...

Category, rank (2010 rank)

scoring defense, 5th (107th)
total defense, 16th (110th)
rushing defense, 36th (95th)
passing defense, 21st (112th)
first downs allowed, 21st (107th)
turnovers gained, 14th, (76th)
opponent 3rd down conversions, 40th (95th)
oppenent red zone conversions 1st, (89th)
sacks, 46th, (93rd)
I honestly thought this stat would be higher. It seems like every time there is a 3rd and short, we stone wall the offense for a loss or no gain. It seems like that happens a lot as well.

However, I'm obviously ecstatic with the improvement.
Nov 13, 2011 1:56pm
D

dave

Senior Member

4,558 posts
Nov 13, 2011 7:02 PM
They are still giving up third and long more than they should, but that is just due to the lack of talent/experience in the secondary. He's the best hire they made by far.

I'm still not sure they can stop guys like Martinez and Miller though.
Nov 13, 2011 2:02pm
B

bigkahuna

Senior Member

4,454 posts
Nov 13, 2011 7:05 PM
dave;970845 wrote:They are still giving up third and long more than they should, but that is just due to the lack of talent/experience in the secondary. He's the best hire they made by far.

I'm still not sure they can stop guys like Martinez and Miller though.
I didn't get to watch the game yesterday and stats don't always tell an accurate story, but how did the D do against Sheelhaus? His abilities are similar to those two but IMO is a better passer than both.
Nov 13, 2011 2:05pm
D

dave

Senior Member

4,558 posts
Nov 13, 2011 7:07 PM
Very well, but you can't begin to compare the o-line and RBs of Neb/OSU to Illinois, that is the big difference.
Nov 13, 2011 2:07pm
B

bigkahuna

Senior Member

4,454 posts
Nov 13, 2011 7:09 PM
dave;970866 wrote:Very well, but you can't begin to compare the o-line and RBs of Neb/OSU to Illinois, that is the big difference.
Touche' good sir.
Nov 13, 2011 2:09pm