Falcons53;963431 wrote:I disagree. The 1998 incident could have been an isolated one with a parent that wanted paid (not saying that is what it was.) I am saying that people who work with kids have things investigated all the time that are false claims from agry parents or kids with a gripe unrelated to anything sexual and they use it to get attention, $$$ or whatever. Remember this was investigated and not charged, so as the HFC you may say OK, they checked on it and said it was false, so we move on, not forgotten, but we move on.
The 2002 incident added to the 1998 one would have made me, as the HFC, say hey this is more than smoke now. That is where the issue comes to light. That is the questions I want answered.
I've tried to avoid reading too much about this (although I did read most of the PDF). There are things I just don't want to know or think about. However, given your explanation above, my question is, did the 1998 incident have anything to do with his resignation as a coach in 1999? For some reason, I was under the impression (could be wrong) that he was informed he wasn't in line to be the head coach any longer and that his resignation was spurred by the 1998 incident.
If his resignation had
anything to do with that incident, the school obviously wasn't buying it as a false allegation. If it was enough to have him walk away from the coaching position, there is no reasonable explanation as to why it wouldn't be enough to disassociate from him completely or at the least, not promote his involvement with a children's organization or enable him with full access/status at the school.
Obviously, if the two (1998 incident and resignation) were not related, my point isn't valid.