thePITman;963581 wrote:I voted YES on Issues 2 & 3.
+1bigdaddy2003;963599 wrote:I too voted YES on issues 2 and 3.
Allows a person to be appointed judge until age 75 instead of 70, or something along those lines.sleeper;963912 wrote:What is Issue 1?
Yeah, that's a no for me.Mulva;963916 wrote:Allows a person to be appointed judge until age 75 instead of 70, or something along those lines.
No way I would vote yes for that one.
So you suggesting Ohio succeed from the Union?Cleveland Buck;964313 wrote:When the federal government's own Supreme Court orders Ohio to abide by the federal law we will see if we have the nuts to continue to defy them. It will determine if the states have any rights left.
Secede?Abe Vigoda;964554 wrote:So you suggesting Ohio succeed from the Union?
That's what you got from that?Abe Vigoda;964554 wrote:So you suggesting Ohio succeed from the Union?
LOL, probably a teacher.Abe Vigoda;964554 wrote:So you suggesting Ohio succeed from the Union?
Hey Ty - I know you like to post polls from progessives showing Obama so far out in front that only Jesus Christ would stand a smidgen of a chance against him. The poll results from the people of Ohio yesterday stated that ObamaKare was defeated 66-34. There can be no better poll taken as the group size was registered voters.Ty Webb;964733 wrote:If the Supreme Court gives the thumbs up to the Health Care Law(which is likely at this point)....this will be rendered null and void
They aren't ruling on the law. They're ruling on the Individual Mandate...which is a sure bet to be torched by a 5-4 vote. Then the ball goes back to Bam to find another way to fund his shitty law.Ty Webb;964733 wrote:If the Supreme Court gives the thumbs up to the Health Care Law(which is likely at this point)....this will be rendered null and void
The majority of funding or sources of new revenue include a much-broadened Medicare tax on incomes over $200,000 and $250,000, for individual and joint filers respectively, an annual fee on insurance providers, and a 40% tax on "Cadillac" insurance policies. There are also taxes on pharmaceuticals, high-cost diagnostic equipment, and a federal sales tax on indoor tanning services. Offsets are from intended cost savings such as improved fairness in the Medicare Advantage program relative to traditional Medicare.fish82;967071 wrote:They aren't ruling on the law. They're ruling on the Individual Mandate...which is a sure bet to be torched by a 5-4 vote. Then the ball goes back to Bam to find another way to fund his ****ty law.
So basically in short, tax the rich. Sounds awesome!Abe Vigoda;967776 wrote:The majority of funding or sources of new revenue include a much-broadened Medicare tax on incomes over $200,000 and $250,000, for individual and joint filers respectively, an annual fee on insurance providers, and a 40% tax on "Cadillac" insurance policies. There are also taxes on pharmaceuticals, high-cost diagnostic equipment, and a federal sales tax on indoor tanning services. Offsets are from intended cost savings such as improved fairness in the Medicare Advantage program relative to traditional Medicare.
The individual mandate just make sure that people who are currently freeloading off the system by not having insurance pay at least something. Sounds fair to me.
Or we can all just not buy health insurance and the hospitals are still required by law to provide services and crash the whole healthcare system. What's your idea of fixing the system?sleeper;967926 wrote:So basically in short, tax the rich. Sounds awesome!
Healthcare is the most complicated problem in the country, book it. I do not have a solution, but I don't want the government managing my healthcare, period.Abe Vigoda;968114 wrote:Or we can all just not buy health insurance and the hospitals are still required by law to provide services and crash the whole healthcare system. What's your idea of fixing the system?
If you can afford it then there is not a thing in the act that says you don't have the choice to keep what you have or buy even better coverage. Is it not true that if you receive Medicare, the government has been "managing your healthcare" for years already?sleeper;968128 wrote:Healthcare is the most complicated problem in the country, book it. I do not have a solution, but I don't want the government managing my healthcare, period.
I'm sure others on here care enough to tell you their solution to the problem.