BR1986FB;869442 wrote:Named after Paul Brown. There was a fan contest after Paul Brown didn't feel it would be right to have the team named after him. The winning name suggestion was "Panthers" but there was already another Cleveland Panthers (in the 20's that their owner still had the naming rights to) so Paul Brown reluctantly agreed to the name.

karen lotz;869443 wrote:Ummm no.

SportsAndLady;869472 wrote: lol dumb bishhh

SportsAndLady;869436 wrote:Random question...some lady I was talking to about buying Rutgers tickets from me said the browns are called browns because of something with bowling green....is that even close to being true? lol

dazedconfused;869500 wrote:the colors (brown and orange) came from bg because the browns used to hold their training camps in bg and paul brown liked the color scheme

karen lotz;869575 wrote:he was something like 17 out of 29 on passes against air. not good numbers for a QB hopeful.

robj55;869589 wrote:it was 27-35 with 4 drops

karen lotz;869600 wrote:Did he have to run uphill and into the wind too?

karen lotz;869600 wrote:Did he have to run uphill and into the wind too?

zach24oz;869702 wrote:I still think 27-35 or whatever you want to call it was much better than what Cam Newton did on his pro day...

j_crazy;869714 wrote:No. But just cause you don't like him doesn't mean you can get the numbers wrong. Also you get pissy too easy.

j_crazy;869714 wrote:No. But just cause you don't like him doesn't mean you can get the numbers wrong. Also you get pissy too easy.

He completed 27 of his 39 throws to moving targets, with (unofficially) four dropped balls.

robj55;869729 wrote:with 4 drops, thats 31-35, not bad, newton looked like trash at the combine throwing the ball

BR1986FB;869837 wrote:Heard the scouting report about Pryor read on Mike & Mike this morning...."incredibly athletic with horrendous accuracy."

karen lotz;869575 wrote:he was something like 17 out of 29 on passes against air. not good numbers for a QB hopeful.

karen lotz;869749 wrote:http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000d5d8219d187/article/maturity-as-much-as-talent-on-display-at-pryors-pro-day

j_crazy;869902 wrote:See. You were kinda harsh in your first posting of the numbers. The assessment I'll agree with (i want the dolphins to get him and put him at WR) but your false numbers helped make your point. All I was asking for is you put the right numbers with your scouting report because people who didn't read what he actually did would get the wrong idea.

Footwedge;869654 wrote:This is for you, Pick6. Pryor will be catching footballs....not throwing them.

karen lotz;869941 wrote:I wasn't trying to make up numbers to make him look bad. I misremembered numbers from a tweet. Why don't you accuse people of being homers that said if there weren't 4 drops he would have only missed 4 passes? My point was he again had accuracy issues and missed 12 throws against air. I apologize if the truth is harsh.

j_crazy;869949 wrote:didn't read 1 post that said that.

i'll say again. you're being pissy about this. it's not a huge deal. but i can tell it's getting under your skin.

robj55;869729 wrote:with 4 drops, thats 31-35, not bad, newton looked like trash at the combine throwing the ball

queencitybuckeye;869948 wrote:There are a few guys who play in the NFL at a different position than they played in college. There's no particular reason to believe that Pryor can switch to receiver and be better than people who have played it all their lives. As a quarterback, he's a freak athlete. As a receiver, he's a slightly better than average athlete with no experience.

If he isn't throwing the ball, he'll need a ticket to get in.