sherm03
Posts: 7,349
Jul 5, 2011 9:25pm
Isn't Casey originally from Warren?
Pick6
Posts: 14,946
Jul 5, 2011 9:25pm
ts1227;822015 wrote:Facebook and the infinite wisdom of their users, there is now an event to "turn your porch lights on at 9pm in memory of Caylee".
Considering most of the world will be turning their porch lights on at 9 because it's dark and they don't want to trip on the front stoop, that'll really show people!
lmfao. I've seen many people bitching about it and those stupid forward messages about it on my facebook.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Jul 5, 2011 9:28pm
Fab1b;822024 wrote:LOL Go Bucks!!
She has ginormous tits.
JerseyBuck
Posts: 429
Jul 5, 2011 9:33pm
sherm03;822026 wrote:Isn't Casey originally from Warren?
Yep
stroups
Posts: 3,223
Jul 5, 2011 9:39pm
THE4RINGZ
Posts: 16,816
Jul 5, 2011 9:40pm
karen lotz;822020 wrote:
I'd fuck the crazy outta this bitch.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Jul 5, 2011 9:42pm
THE4RINGZ;822053 wrote:I'd fuck the crazy outta this bitch.
Apparently that would take a lot of fucking. Maybe if everyone on the OC contributed their 30 seconds, we could straighten her out.
gorocks99
Posts: 10,760
Jul 5, 2011 9:44pm
karen lotz;822054 wrote:Apparently that would take a lot of fucking. Maybe if everyone on the OC contributed their 30 seconds, we could straighten her out.
Can we trade vCash for extra time?
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Jul 5, 2011 9:47pm
gorocks99;822055 wrote:Can we trade vCash for extra time?
If vCash helps you last longer in the sack, more power to you. I was thinking maybe everyone drinks a fifth of Jack before. Whiskey dick never let anyone down.
Curly J
Posts: 7,282
Jul 5, 2011 10:04pm
I turned this one down and will be boycotting this event. Not by choice, but because I have no porch light !!!ts1227;822015 wrote:Facebook and the infinite wisdom of their users, there is now an event to "turn your porch lights on at 9pm in memory of Caylee".
Considering most of the world will be turning their porch lights on at 9 because it's dark and they don't want to trip on the front stoop, that'll really show people!
Oh and my Cousin posted this on there
Little Danny
Posts: 4,288
Jul 5, 2011 10:30pm
sherm03;822026 wrote:Isn't Casey originally from Warren?
Not that there is much of a difference, but she is from Niles (of course, people from Warren and Niles would tell you there is a major difference). I think they may have also lived in Howland for a stretch before the family moved to Florida, but again we are talking about a matter of a few miles distance.
E
enigmaax
Posts: 4,511
Jul 5, 2011 10:40pm
Like your boy said, "E'rrybody murders people."
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Jul 5, 2011 10:43pm
karen lotz;822020 wrote:
why can't i see anything
majorspark
Posts: 5,122
Jul 5, 2011 11:37pm
dwccrew;821992 wrote:this was a terrible case presented by the prosecution.
I would not use the word terrible. Not good enough would be how I would describe it. The circumstantial evidence was very strong. If the prosecution could not get her to plead to a lesser charge with it, they should have just held off. This ditz is dumb enough to hang herself. Just give her the rope.
See Scott Peterson. Currently on death row in California. It happens more than you would think.dwccrew;821992 wrote:All circumstantial evidence will never lead to a conviction.
GoPens
Posts: 2,339
Jul 5, 2011 11:52pm
GoChiefs;821818 wrote:True. But what does he have to do with the Casey Anthony trial?
I was commenting on a previous post about how she doesn't have a kid to impede on her lifestyle anymore.
I
I Wear Pants
Posts: 16,223
Jul 6, 2011 12:06am
Casey Anthony? Meet Dexter Morgan...
Fab1b
Posts: 12,949
Jul 6, 2011 12:21am
Was just reading the local news that hundreds of people have decended on Anthony's neighborhood. Why? First off think of the other residents there. Why do people feel the need to inject themselves into this? The justice system worked people! The state could not prove their case and lost. Get over it!!
Fab1b
Posts: 12,949
Jul 6, 2011 1:20am
Watching the replay of Nancy Grace, what a joke this woman and her panel are!!
I
I Wear Pants
Posts: 16,223
Jul 6, 2011 1:21am
Nancy Grace is a stupid ****.
I
I Wear Pants
Posts: 16,223
Jul 6, 2011 1:22am
Are you fucking kidding me?
M
Manhattan Buckeye
Posts: 7,566
Jul 6, 2011 1:23am
Interesting comments, most of my legal friends think the prosecution did an ok job (note, I've barely followed the case) and were a bit surprised, but not shocked at the verdict. The prosecution did what they could with the evidence, and there was physical evidence, a body as well as the body's state and location. Add that up to all of the damning circumstantial evidence what else is there? There isn't a smoking gun or courtroom confession. Perhaps some jurors won't ever convict on circumstantial evidence regardless of the probability. The standard is reasonable doubt, not beyond any doubt.
Fab1b
Posts: 12,949
Jul 6, 2011 1:28am
Typical bitch she is, a guest agrees with the jury and asks Nancy how she can question them and Grace kicks him off the show LMAO glad I decided to catch this train wreck!
ZWICK 4 PREZ
Posts: 7,733
Jul 6, 2011 6:31am
Manhattan Buckeye;822162 wrote:most of my legal friends think the prosecution did an ok job
What do your illegal friends think of the prosecutions work?
M
Manhattan Buckeye
Posts: 7,566
Jul 6, 2011 6:35am
They can't say or else risk being deported.
Seriously, what did people want? The have a body, a motive, and a trail of lies and a ridiculous excuse by the defense. What else could the prosecution do? Post a youtube video of the act? The case largely depended on circumstantial evidence. If we couldn't convict anyone without an eyewitness or CSI level DNA evidence (which never occurs), there would be few convictions.
Seriously, what did people want? The have a body, a motive, and a trail of lies and a ridiculous excuse by the defense. What else could the prosecution do? Post a youtube video of the act? The case largely depended on circumstantial evidence. If we couldn't convict anyone without an eyewitness or CSI level DNA evidence (which never occurs), there would be few convictions.
ZWICK 4 PREZ
Posts: 7,733
Jul 6, 2011 6:45am
Manhattan Buckeye;822196 wrote:They can't say or else risk being deported.
Seriously, what did people want? The have a body, a motive, and a trail of lies and a ridiculous excuse by the defense. What else could the prosecution do? Post a youtube video of the act? The case largely depended on circumstantial evidence. If we couldn't convict anyone without an eyewitness or CSI level DNA evidence (which never occurs), there would be few convictions.
My brother in laws a pretty big lawyer in DC and I asked him awhile ago and he thought she would be probably found guilty. He agrees the prosecution worked with what they had.