Ty Webb;821742 wrote:This isn't a funny situation...

Go away.

I followed this story from day 1. I was shocked when the state rested, thinking, 'that's all you got?' I expected not guilty on the 1st degree and manslaughter, but how do you let her go free on agg. child abuse after not caring where the baby was for over a month, and lying all about it? The evidence was all circumstantial because the remains were under water for 4 months, no eye witness, etc. But the circumstantial evidence is clear. Casey never reported anything, even when the police took her statement she totally lied. The defense sucked, but the prosecution had only circumstance to work with. Also, the jury only knows what they were in the courtroom for, and missed alot of what happened during proffers and other hearings. The jury don't know half as much as people who watched on tv. I'm only a little surprised at the whole decision, because as a former C.O. , I know how messed up the American justice system is.
http://www.volusiaexposed.com/

http://www.volusiaexposed.com/modzelewski/modjo.html
only in America can you be a crook in charge of investigating cops.

Has any of the experts mentioned teh CSI or Law and Order effect on jurors?

I have heard that a number of times where jurors get so wrapped up in everything coming together just perfectly to convict someone but in reality that doesnt happen ofen.

IggyPride00;821685 wrote:That tattoo Casey got proved to be awful prophetic, as she really will be living the beautiful life now. She is free, will be able to cash in on the case, doesn't have the kid to impede on her lifestyle anymore. She has gotten everything she ever wanted in exchange for about 3 years of her freedom.

The skank will get drunk and will be pregnant within a year.

GoPens;821811 wrote:skank will get drunk and will be pregnant within a year.

True. But what does he have to do with the Casey Anthony trial?

Ty Webb;821745 wrote:NO....I think she looks like a degranged leperchan

This IS NOT a funny situation. This women is a murderer and got away with it.

Gibby, I've seen you. You'd hit it.

DeyDurkie5;821789 wrote:Ty, she isn't a murderer and that is proven in the court of law. Get over it.

Saying she isn't a murderer is like saying OJ isn't a murderer...we all know that isnt true

Fab1b;821770 wrote:Gibwok is plain and simple cute LOL

You rang?

ernest_t_bass;821819 wrote:Gibby, I've seen you. You'd hit it.

I'd hit it with a tire iron. But first I'd have sex with it.

If you think she looks like a deranged leprechaun then ship me to Deranged Leprechaun land.

Ty Webb;821821 wrote:Saying she isn't a murderer is like saying OJ isn't a murderer...we all know that isnt true

Based on your opinion???

justincredible;821823 wrote:I'd hit it with a tire iron. But first I'd have sex with it.

Lol winner!!!!!!

Midstate01;821825 wrote:Based on your opinion???

Based on the facts and based on the fact that she didn't report her missing for a month

There's no evidence at all that says SHE did it. There are too many gaps in the story!! We probably all think she did it. BUT, they never proved she did it. Thats the key. Jurors can't make decisions based on feelings.

Fab1b;821770 wrote:Gibwok is plain and simple cute LOL

That quote kinda scares me Fab

Ty Webb;821828 wrote:Based on the facts and based on the fact that she didn't report her missing for a month

If the facts proved she did it, she wouldn't have been found not guilty.

LOL

You didn't address my other point, weren't you on here defending MJ from being called a pedo but yet you label her a murderer?

Ty Webb;821828 wrote:Based on the facts and based on the fact that she didn't report her missing for a month

Which facts? So, how'd she do it? When did she do it? Where?

GoChiefs;821818 wrote:True. But what does he have to do with the Casey Anthony trial?

noted.

Fab1b;821832 wrote:LOL

You didn't address my other point, weren't you on here defending MJ from being called a pedo but yet you label her a murderer?

It was proven he didn't do what he was accused of....

She may have been found not guilty....but nothing was provided to prove to me she didn't murder her daughter

Ty Webb;821840 wrote:It was proven he didn't do what he was accused of....

She may have been found not guilty....but nothing was provided to prove to me she didn't murder her daughter

Proven? Why because he shelled out the dough to make it go away? You show me proof on either side. Can't have your cake and eat it too. If he can't be a pedo then she can't be a murderer plain and simple!

DeyDurkie5;821789 wrote:Ty, she isn't a murderer and that is proven in the court of law. Get over it.

That is not what happens in court. Nothing was proven. A not guilty means there was reasonable doubt in the way of proving guilt. That is much different than proving that someone didn't do something.

Fab1b;821842 wrote:Proven? Why because he shelled out the dough to make it go away? You show me proof on either side. Can't have your cake and eat it too. If he can't be a pedo then she can't be a murderer plain and simple!

Gibby would love to have MJ's cake and eat it too, if you catch my drift...

Ty Webb;821840 wrote:but nothing was provided to prove to me she didn't murder her daughter

And nothing was provided to prove to me that MJ wasn't a child molester.

Gardens35;821838 wrote:noted.

I voted.