Mulva
Posts: 13,650
Jan 5, 2010 9:08pm
14-7 at the beginning of the second.
Georgia Tech has 18 yards and 0 first downs.
Stanzi went 9/10 for 156 yards and 2 TD, but the one incompletion was a pick six.
Georgia Tech has 18 yards and 0 first downs.
Stanzi went 9/10 for 156 yards and 2 TD, but the one incompletion was a pick six.
Lovejoy1984
Posts: 5,277
Jan 5, 2010 9:09pm
14-7 Iowa.
rmolin73
Posts: 4,278
Jan 5, 2010 9:09pm
Iowa up 14-0 on first two possesions Stanzi threw a pic and GT took it back for a TD. Iowa currently driving again.
dwccrew
Posts: 7,817
Jan 5, 2010 9:10pm
Nice. Iowa can give the Big 10 a winning bowl season. Let's go Hawkeyes!!!
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Jan 5, 2010 9:17pm
^^^
Nope, 21 to this point, all on the ground
Nope, 21 to this point, all on the ground
rmolin73
Posts: 4,278
Jan 5, 2010 9:19pm
But what about all that speed that they have?
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Jan 5, 2010 9:40pm
Illegal touching on Tech.
heehee
heehee
SQ_Crazies
Posts: 7,977
Jan 5, 2010 10:02pm
Is it just me or is this not shocking to anyone else? Sure is to the guys on Fox.
I'm not surprised one bit--I guess those guys didn't give Iowa's defense enough respect.
I'm not surprised one bit--I guess those guys didn't give Iowa's defense enough respect.
jordo212000
Posts: 10,664
Jan 5, 2010 10:06pm
Iowa's defense has been stout. They are just completely shutting GA Tech down. I agree Iowa does look like they are handling Tech's "speed" pretty well, but only 1 half has been played. I want to see how Georgia Tech responds. Their offense has been pretty solid all season
SQ_Crazies
Posts: 7,977
Jan 5, 2010 10:09pm
This resembles the OSU/Oregon game a lot (just a not-so-good version of either team), I figured Iowa would be able to contain GT for the most part.
jhay78
Posts: 1,917
Jan 5, 2010 10:19pm
Heard Jim Rome today say, "If Ohio State can get 200+ rushing yards vs. Iowa, you KNOW Ga Tech will do it"
Not so fast, Jimmy.
Not so fast, Jimmy.
C
charliehustle14
Posts: 2,224
Jan 5, 2010 10:24pm
Iowa's D struggling on this opening drive.
Had GT 2nd and 18 and let Dwyer go for 15.
Had GT 2nd and 18 and let Dwyer go for 15.
C
charliehustle14
Posts: 2,224
Jan 5, 2010 10:29pm
Missed the FG.
Dear Johnson and Kelly,
If you normally go for manageble 4th downs, don't change just because you're playing in a BCS bowl in front of the nation.
Dear Johnson and Kelly,
If you normally go for manageble 4th downs, don't change just because you're playing in a BCS bowl in front of the nation.
C
charliehustle14
Posts: 2,224
Jan 5, 2010 10:42pm
How the heck did Sandeman drop that?
Murray's kick is good. 17-7.
Murray's kick is good. 17-7.
I
ironman02
Posts: 4,989
Jan 5, 2010 10:42pm
Wish Iowa would have got 7 there, but I'll take 3. Up 17-7 now and GT hasn't been able to produce any points offensively.
Mulva
Posts: 13,650
Jan 5, 2010 10:45pm
The last bowl victory for Iowa was definitely not in '59.
I
ironman02
Posts: 4,989
Jan 5, 2010 10:59pm
And of course, GT goes right down the field and scores. 17-14.
Come on, Iowa. Win this!
Come on, Iowa. Win this!
C
charliehustle14
Posts: 2,224
Jan 5, 2010 11:00pm
Major Bowl victory ala Rose BowlMulva wrote: The last bowl victory for Iowa was definitely not in '59.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Jan 5, 2010 11:08pm
Promising drive stalls out for Iowa. I like that they were taking shots down the field instead of trying to work the clock. Playing to win instead of playing not to lose.
I
ironman02
Posts: 4,989
Jan 5, 2010 11:08pm
So Iowa is running the football, basically at will, and then they decide to throw on three straight downs. If they were trying to kill that drive, they definitely succeeded.
I
ironman02
Posts: 4,989
Jan 5, 2010 11:10pm
Haha...looks like we saw that a little differently.karen lotz wrote: Promising drive stalls out for Iowa. I like that they were taking shots down the field instead of trying to work the clock. Playing to win instead of playing not to lose.
I
ironman02
Posts: 4,989
Jan 5, 2010 11:12pm
Wow, what an awful decision by Nesbitt. That could be the nail in the coffin if Iowa can capitalize.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Jan 5, 2010 11:14pm
hahahaha I was just saying I like the aggressiveness of Iowa. A lot of teams in their position would be running isos and dives until the clock ran outironman02 wrote:Haha...looks like we saw that a little differently.karen lotz wrote: Promising drive stalls out for Iowa. I like that they were taking shots down the field instead of trying to work the clock. Playing to win instead of playing not to lose.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Jan 5, 2010 11:16pm
Dammit Iowa
I
ironman02
Posts: 4,989
Jan 5, 2010 11:16pm
Yeah, you're right. Playing not to lose usually backfires.