Non
Posts: 9,517
Oct 11, 2011 9:32pm
That would be a crazy bet. $500 both ways. It should be like $500 to you if the Steelers don't make it and $2000 for me if I call one team to make the Super Bowl.DeyDurkie5;930706 wrote:dude, I could give two ****s what the **** you think the gay steelers will do. I want to know do you want to make a super bowl bet or not since they "could get lucky" 500 bucks straight up
hasbeen
Posts: 6,504
Oct 11, 2011 9:36pm
Laley23;930707 wrote:Raiders had only 10 men on field in final play (interception by Huff in endzone) versus Texans. Just imagine if they had lost lol.
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/11/on-final-play-raiders-had-10-men-on-the-field/
Al davis was eleven
chicago510
Posts: 5,728
Oct 11, 2011 9:38pm
Non;930683 wrote: That might be how the Browns operate but the Steelers will go back to the lab and figure out the right formula.
Heretic
Posts: 18,820
Oct 12, 2011 12:46pm
I'm glad Tebow's starting. Either he succeeds and proves he's worth a fraction of the love the relig-tard nuthuggers have given him because he's a great god-lovin' guy or he fails and hopefully at least ceases to be a national story every time he breathes.friendfromlowry;930520 wrote:Damn I am so sick of hearing about Denver and their quarterbacks. Orton, Quinn, and Tebow all fucking suck and none of them should start. But since someone has to, just pick one of them already and stick with it. I've never seen such a commotion over a 1-4 team. You would think they are actually good.
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Oct 12, 2011 1:45pm
Laley23;930707 wrote:Raiders had only 10 men on field in final play (interception by Huff in endzone) versus Texans. Just imagine if they had lost lol.
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/11/on-final-play-raiders-had-10-men-on-the-field/
Bullshit. Al Davis was on the field with the D. He was the 11th defender.
Just win, baby.
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Oct 12, 2011 2:18pm
He would be absolutely retarded to take a bet like that. Even more retarded than you thinking Cleveland would win more games than Pittsburgh last year. :laugh:DeyDurkie5;930706 wrote:dude, I could give two shits what the fuck you think the gay steelers will do. I want to know do you want to make a super bowl bet or not since they "could get lucky" 500 bucks straight up
IggyPride00
Posts: 6,482
Oct 12, 2011 8:20pm
http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/7093244/seattle-seahawks-trade-aaron-curry-oakland-raiders-sources-say
He has been a total bust. Thank God the Seahawks drafted him at 4, because I firmly believe that had he been on the board Mangini would have taken him at 5.The Seattle Seahawks traded linebacker Aaron Curry to the Oakland Raiders on Wednesday for draft picks in 2012 and another in 2013, a source
familiar with deal told ESPN NFL Insider Adam Schefter.
Seattle will receive a seventh-round pick in 2012 and a mid-round conditional pick (fourth or fifth round) in 2013 based on Curry's playing time with Oakland, a source told ESPN senior NFL analyst Chris Mortensen.
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
Oct 12, 2011 8:22pm
Yep, and I would have been ecstatic. I was 100% on board the Aaron Curry express. Ill admit how poor that ride has been.IggyPride00;931732 wrote:http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/7093244/seattle-seahawks-trade-aaron-curry-oakland-raiders-sources-say
He has been a total bust. Thank God the Seahawks drafted him at 4, because I firmly believe that had he been on the board Mangini would have taken him at 5.
Mulva
Posts: 13,650
Oct 12, 2011 10:37pm
I was all over Curry being a bust. I actually celebrated Seattle taking him because it meant the Browns wouldn't.
I thought Robiskie would be a solid receiver though, so win some lose some with that draft.
I thought Robiskie would be a solid receiver though, so win some lose some with that draft.
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Oct 13, 2011 8:39am
Count me in as a Curry believer. I really liked him that year. Raiders could have gotten a steal.
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Oct 13, 2011 9:01am
Same. I doubt it to the bolded part.Commander of Awesome;932176 wrote:Count me in as a Curry believer. I really liked him that year. Raiders could have gotten a steal.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Oct 13, 2011 9:10am
Was a Curry fan too but he's just a "guy." Serviceable LB who will make tackles but will likely never be an "impact" guy...kinda like Andra Davis.Commander of Awesome;932176 wrote:Count me in as a Curry believer. I really liked him that year. Raiders could have gotten a steal.
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Oct 13, 2011 9:25am
He's got to be a better SLBer than Fujita.BR1986FB;932201 wrote:Was a Curry fan too but he's just a "guy." Serviceable LB who will make tackles but will likely never be an "impact" guy...kinda like Andra Davis.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Oct 13, 2011 9:41am
Not gonna win anything this year. I'd rather them roll the dice and see if they're in a position to draft Vontaze Burfict.Commander of Awesome;932214 wrote:He's got to be a better SLBer than Fujita.
Hb31187
Posts: 8,534
Oct 13, 2011 12:13pm
Dj williams and Brian Dawkins to the Eagles for a 3rd rounder is a rumor? That wouldnt be a bad get for Philly
Mulva
Posts: 13,650
Oct 13, 2011 4:45pm
I love Burfict, but would you play him SLB, or put him inside and move DQ out?BR1986FB;932226 wrote:Not gonna win anything this year. I'd rather them roll the dice and see if they're in a position to draft Vontaze Burfict.
gorocks99
Posts: 10,760
Oct 14, 2011 1:48pm
NFL will start testing for HGH as early as next week: http://mike-freeman.blogs.cbssports.com/mcc/blogs/entry/6264363/32715954
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Oct 14, 2011 1:50pm
Wow....this could get really interesting.gorocks99;933394 wrote:NFL will start testing for HGH as early as next week: http://mike-freeman.blogs.cbssports.com/mcc/blogs/entry/6264363/32715954
Iliketurtles
Posts: 8,191
Oct 14, 2011 2:07pm
This will be big! Definitely will be interesting to see what happens.gorocks99;933394 wrote:NFL will start testing for HGH as early as next week: http://mike-freeman.blogs.cbssports.com/mcc/blogs/entry/6264363/32715954
gorocks99
Posts: 10,760
Oct 14, 2011 2:08pm
If/when it is implemented, who's the first to get nailed?
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Oct 14, 2011 2:17pm
Ray Lewis.gorocks99;933411 wrote:If/when it is implemented, who's the first to get nailed?
gorocks99
Posts: 10,760
Oct 14, 2011 2:18pm
I was gonna guess someone totally off the radar. Jason Hanson or something.
T
thavoice
Posts: 14,376
Oct 14, 2011 2:25pm
It will be harder to quantify how this affects the game than it has been in baseball since they started mandatory steriods training. You see power numbers down pretty much across the board in MLB>
I guess maybe just the size of players possibly.
I guess maybe just the size of players possibly.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Oct 14, 2011 6:01pm
Inside, DQ outside.Mulva;932633 wrote:I love Burfict, but would you play him SLB, or put him inside and move DQ out?
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Oct 14, 2011 6:01pm
Good call. Been playing at a pretty high level as he gets older & older.like_that;933420 wrote:Ray Lewis.